• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行人死亡风险的文献综述,作为汽车碰撞速度的函数。

Literature review of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed.

机构信息

Autoliv Research, Vårgårda, Sweden.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.003
PMID:21094293
Abstract

The aim of this review was to evaluate all studies of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. Relevant papers were primarily investigated with respect to data sampling procedures and methods for statistical analysis. It was uniformly reported that fatality risk increased monotonically with car impact speed. However, the absolute risk estimates varied considerably. Without exceptions, papers written before 2000 were based on direct analyses of data that had a large bias towards severe and fatal injuries. The consequence was to overestimate the fatality risks. We also found more recent research based on less biased data or adjusted for bias. While still showing a steep increase of risk with impact speed, these later papers provided substantially lower risk estimates than had been previously reported.

摘要

本次综述的目的是评估所有行人死亡风险作为汽车碰撞速度函数的研究。主要研究了相关论文的数据采样程序和统计分析方法。一致的报告表明,死亡风险随着汽车碰撞速度的增加而单调增加。然而,绝对风险估计值差异很大。无一例外,2000 年以前发表的论文都是基于对有严重和致命伤害的大偏差数据的直接分析。结果是高估了死亡风险。我们还发现了更多基于无偏差数据或对偏差进行调整的最新研究。虽然这些后来的论文仍然显示出风险随碰撞速度的急剧增加,但与之前报道的风险估计值相比,它们提供的风险估计值要低得多。

相似文献

1
Literature review of pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed.行人死亡风险的文献综述,作为汽车碰撞速度的函数。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
2
Pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed.行人死亡风险与汽车碰撞速度的函数关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2009 May;41(3):536-42. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.02.002. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
3
Logistic regression analysis of pedestrian casualty risk in passenger vehicle collisions in China.中国乘用车碰撞中行人伤亡风险的 logistic 回归分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jul;42(4):987-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.006. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
4
Priorities of pedestrian protection--a real-life study of severe injuries and car sources.行人保护的优先级——严重伤害和汽车来源的实际研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1672-81. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.006. Epub 2010 May 15.
5
A note on modeling pedestrian-injury severity in motor-vehicle crashes with the mixed logit model.关于混合 Logit 模型在机动车事故中行人伤害严重程度建模的说明。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1751-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.016. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
6
Exploring differential trends in severe and fatal child pedestrian injury in New South Wales, Australia (1997-2006).探讨澳大利亚新南威尔士州严重和致命儿童行人伤害的差异趋势(1997-2006 年)。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1705-11. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.010. Epub 2010 May 14.
7
Relative fatality risk curve to describe the effect of change in the impact speed on fatality risk of pedestrians struck by a motor vehicle.用于描述改变机动车撞击行人时的碰撞速度对行人致死风险的影响的相对致死风险曲线。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jan;62:143-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
8
The risk of pedestrian injury and fatality in collisions with motor vehicles, a social ecological study of state routes and city streets in King County, Washington.与机动车碰撞致行人受伤和死亡的风险:华盛顿州金县州级道路和城市街道的社会生态学研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):11-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.008. Epub 2010 Sep 16.
9
Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking.自动驾驶车辆自动制动以减轻行人伤害。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1949-57. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.018. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
10
Visual assessment of pedestrian crashes.行人事故的视觉评估。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Jan;43(1):301-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.028.

引用本文的文献

1
Fatal road traffic accidents and injuries: a preliminary study.致命道路交通事故与伤害:一项初步研究。
Int J Legal Med. 2025 Jan;139(1):375-381. doi: 10.1007/s00414-024-03339-4. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
2
Drivers' performance assessment approaching pedestrian crossings through the analysis of the speed and perceptive data recorded during on-field tests.通过分析现场测试期间记录的速度和感知数据来评估驾驶员接近人行横道时的表现。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 6;10(1):e24249. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24249. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
3
Effectiveness of road safety interventions: An evidence and gap map.
道路安全干预措施的有效性:证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 3;20(1):e1367. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1367. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Divergent Effects of Factors on Crash Severity under Autonomous and Conventional Driving Modes Using a Hierarchical Bayesian Approach.基于分层贝叶斯方法的自主和常规驾驶模式下因素对碰撞严重程度的不同影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 9;19(18):11358. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811358.
5
Pilot study to evaluate school safety zone built environment interventions.评价学校安全区建成环境干预措施的初步研究。
Inj Prev. 2022 Jun;28(3):243-248. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2021-044299. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
6
Ethical Decision Making in Autonomous Vehicles: The AV Ethics Project.自动驾驶汽车中的伦理决策:AV 伦理项目。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3285-3312. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00272-8. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
7
Effect of reducing the posted speed limit to 30 km per hour on pedestrian motor vehicle collisions in Toronto, Canada - a quasi experimental, pre-post study.在加拿大多伦多,将限速降至每小时 30 公里对行人和机动车碰撞的影响——一项准实验、前后研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-8139-5.
8
Effects of city-wide 20 mph (30km/hour) speed limits on road injuries in Bristol, UK.英国布里斯托全市 20 英里/小时(30 公里/小时)限速对道路伤害的影响。
Inj Prev. 2020 Feb;26(1):85-88. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043305. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
9
Childhood road traffic injuries in Canada - a provincial comparison of transport injury rates over time.加拿大儿童道路交通伤害-随时间推移的交通伤害率的省级比较。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 6;18(1):1348. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6269-9.
10
Impact of automated photo enforcement of vehicle speed in school zones: interrupted time series analysis.学校区域车辆速度自动拍照执法的影响:中断时间序列分析。
Inj Prev. 2019 Oct;25(5):400-406. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2018-042912. Epub 2018 Oct 2.