Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Dec 1;106(11):1566-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.07.029. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
Most patients with chronic ischemia and an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) for primary prevention do not experience therapies for ventricular arrhythmias on follow-up. The present study aimed to identify independent clinical, electrocardiographic, and echocardiographic predictors of death and occurrence of ICD therapy in patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy and ICD for primary prevention. A total of 424 patients with chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy, ejection fraction ≤ 35%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥ II were recruited. All patients underwent echocardiography before ICD insertion. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcome was occurrence of appropriate ICD therapy on follow-up. Primary and secondary outcomes occurred in 84 and 95 patients, respectively. Patients who died were more likely to have diabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00 to 2.79, p = 0.049), higher NYHA class (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.15 to 3.33, p = 0.013), lower peri-infarct strain on echocardiogram (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.46, p = 0.005), and lower glomerular filtration rate (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.03, p = 0.022). Only peri-infarct strain (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.36, p < 0.001) predicted the occurrence of ICD therapy on follow-up. In conclusion, in chronic ischemic patients with an ICD for primary prevention, the presence of diabetes, renal dysfunction, higher NYHA class, and impaired peri-infarct zone function were predictors of all-cause mortality. In contrast, only impaired peri-infarct zone function determined the occurrence of appropriate ICD therapy on follow-up.
大多数患有慢性缺血和植入式心脏除颤器 (ICD) 进行一级预防的患者在随访中不会经历室性心律失常治疗。本研究旨在确定慢性缺血性心肌病和 ICD 进行一级预防的患者的独立临床、心电图和超声心动图预测死亡和 ICD 治疗的发生。共招募了 424 名患有慢性缺血性心肌病、射血分数≤35%和纽约心脏协会 (NYHA) 分级≥II 级的患者。所有患者在植入 ICD 前均接受超声心动图检查。主要结局是全因死亡率;次要结局是随访期间发生适当的 ICD 治疗。主要和次要结局分别发生在 84 例和 95 例患者中。死亡患者更可能患有糖尿病(风险比 [HR] 1.67,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.00 至 2.79,p = 0.049)、更高的 NYHA 分级(HR 1.96,95%CI 1.15 至 3.33,p = 0.013)、超声心动图检查显示的梗死周边区应变较低(HR 1.25,95%CI 1.07 至 1.46,p = 0.005)和肾小球滤过率较低(HR 1.01,95%CI 1.00 至 1.03,p = 0.022)。只有梗死周边区应变(HR 1.22,95%CI 1.09 至 1.36,p < 0.001)预测了随访期间 ICD 治疗的发生。总之,在患有慢性缺血和 ICD 进行一级预防的患者中,糖尿病、肾功能不全、更高的 NYHA 分级和梗死周边区功能障碍的存在是全因死亡率的预测因素。相比之下,只有梗死周边区功能障碍决定了随访期间适当的 ICD 治疗的发生。