Department of Laboratory Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Clin Chem. 2011 Jan;57(1):122-7. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2010.154088. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
Accurate measurement of free thyroxine (FT(4)) is important for diagnosing and managing thyroid disorders. Most laboratories measure FT(4) by direct analogue immunoassay methods. The validity of these methods have recently been questioned. The inverse log-linear relationship between FT(4) and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) is well described and provides a physiological rationale on which to base an evaluation of FT(4) assays.
The study included 109 participants for whom FT(4) measurement was requested by their clinician. Samples were selected for inclusion to reflect a wide spectrum of TSH and albumin results. FT(4) and TSH were measured by use of the Siemens Immulite immunoassay (IA). FT(4) was also measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (MS-FT(4)).
The inverse log-linear correlation coefficient between TSH and FT(4) was significantly better (P < 0.0001) for MS-FT(4) (0.84, 95% CI, 0.77-0.88) than for IA-FT(4) (0.45, 95% CI, 0.29-0.59). IA-FT(4) showed a significant correlation with albumin (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.45, 95% CI, 0.29-0.5, P < 0.0001) and thyroxine-binding globulin (TBG) (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.23, 95% CI, 0.05-0.41, P = 0.02). In contrast, FT(4) measurement by LC-MS/MS did not show a significant correlation with albumin or TBG.
The inverse log-linear relationship between FT(4) and TSH was significantly better for FT(4) measured by LC-MS/MS than by IA. The MS-FT(4) method therefore provides FT(4) results that agree clinically with those obtained for TSH. Additionally, the significant correlation between IA-FT(4) with albumin and TBG suggests that this FT(4) method depends on binding protein concentrations and consequently does not accurately reflect FT(4).
准确测量游离甲状腺素 (FT(4)) 对于诊断和治疗甲状腺疾病非常重要。大多数实验室通过直接模拟免疫测定方法测量 FT(4)。这些方法的有效性最近受到质疑。FT(4)与促甲状腺激素 (TSH) 之间的倒数对数关系得到了很好的描述,并为评估 FT(4)测定提供了生理依据。
该研究纳入了 109 名临床医生要求测量 FT(4)的参与者。为了反映 TSH 和白蛋白结果的广泛范围,选择了样本进行纳入。FT(4)和 TSH 分别使用西门子 Immulite 免疫测定 (IA) 和液相色谱-串联质谱法 (LC-MS/MS) (MS-FT(4)) 进行测量。
MS-FT(4) 与 TSH 之间的倒数对数相关系数明显更好 (P < 0.0001),为 0.84(95%CI,0.77-0.88),而 IA-FT(4) 为 0.45(95%CI,0.29-0.59)。IA-FT(4) 与白蛋白 (Spearman 相关系数 0.45,95%CI,0.29-0.5,P < 0.0001) 和甲状腺素结合球蛋白 (TBG) (Spearman 相关系数 0.23,95%CI,0.05-0.41,P = 0.02) 呈显著相关。相比之下,LC-MS/MS 测定的 FT(4)与白蛋白或 TBG 无显著相关性。
LC-MS/MS 测定的 FT(4)与 TSH 之间的倒数对数关系明显优于 IA。因此,MS-FT(4) 方法提供的 FT(4)结果与 TSH 获得的结果在临床上一致。此外,IA-FT(4) 与白蛋白和 TBG 呈显著相关表明,这种 FT(4)方法依赖于结合蛋白浓度,因此不能准确反映 FT(4)。