Kahric-Janicic Natasa, Soldin Steven J, Soldin Offie P, West Threvia, Gu Jianghong, Jonklaas Jacqueline
Division of Endocrinology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Thyroid. 2007 Apr;17(4):303-11. doi: 10.1089/thy.2006.0303.
Pregnancy is a time of rapidly changing demands on the thyroid axis, and knowledge of thyroid hormone levels, especially during the first trimester, is important for ensuring maternal and fetal health. The thyroid hormone assays currently in use become more inaccurate at extremes of binding protein concentrations and when heterophilic antibodies are present. Pregnancy is characterized by both these conditions, making accurate determination of free thyroid hormone levels by conventional direct analog immunoassay methods difficult. The objective of this study was to characterize the performance of a novel tandem mass spectrometric assay for free thyroxine during the physiologic conditions of pregnancy.
Healthy women without a history of thyroid abnormalities were recruited from the obstetrics and gynecology and endocrinology clinics of a university medical center and their thyroid status was monitored. Free thyroxine levels were assessed by both immunoassay and tandem mass spectrometry during the course of their pregnancy. Serum thyrotropin levels were also measured. The distributions of free thyroid concentrations obtained by the two assays were compared.
The tandem mass spectrometry and immunoassay values did not correlate well with each other. However, tandem mass spectrometry values correlated well with the current gold standard equilibrium dialysis values. Moreover, the good agreement between equilibrium dialysis and tandem mass spectrometry was maintained across all weeks of gestation.
We conclude that tandem mass spectrometry has a superior performance to immunoassay for the measurement of free thyroxine during pregnancy. Furthermore, it is ideally suited to generating trimester-specific reference intervals for free thyroxine levels. Future studies will determine if it is a better assay to use in most clinical circumstances.
孕期甲状腺轴的需求迅速变化,了解甲状腺激素水平,尤其是孕早期的水平,对于确保母婴健康至关重要。目前使用的甲状腺激素检测方法在结合蛋白浓度极高或存在嗜异性抗体时会变得更不准确。孕期的特点正是这两种情况,使得通过传统的直接类似物免疫分析方法准确测定游离甲状腺激素水平变得困难。本研究的目的是在孕期的生理条件下,对一种新型的游离甲状腺素串联质谱分析法的性能进行表征。
从一所大学医学中心的妇产科和内分泌科诊所招募无甲状腺异常病史的健康女性,并监测她们的甲状腺状态。在她们的孕期过程中,通过免疫分析和串联质谱法评估游离甲状腺素水平。还测量了血清促甲状腺激素水平。比较了两种检测方法获得的游离甲状腺浓度分布。
串联质谱法和免疫分析的值彼此相关性不佳。然而,串联质谱法的值与当前的金标准平衡透析值相关性良好。此外,在整个孕期的所有周数中,平衡透析和串联质谱法之间都保持了良好的一致性。
我们得出结论,在孕期测量游离甲状腺素时,串联质谱法比免疫分析具有更优越的性能。此外,它非常适合生成游离甲状腺素水平的孕龄特异性参考区间。未来的研究将确定在大多数临床情况下它是否是一种更好的检测方法。