Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180, USA.
J Biol Chem. 2011 Feb 4;286(5):3209-18. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.173856. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
In protein conformational disorders ranging from Alzheimer to Parkinson disease, proteins of unrelated sequence misfold into a similar array of aggregated conformers ranging from small oligomers to large amyloid fibrils. Substantial evidence suggests that small, prefibrillar oligomers are the most toxic species, yet to what extent they can be selectively targeted and remodeled into non-toxic conformers using small molecules is poorly understood. We have evaluated the conformational specificity and remodeling pathways of a diverse panel of aromatic small molecules against mature soluble oligomers of the Aβ42 peptide associated with Alzheimer disease. We find that small molecule antagonists can be grouped into three classes, which we herein define as Class I, II, and III molecules, based on the distinct pathways they utilize to remodel soluble oligomers into multiple conformers with reduced toxicity. Class I molecules remodel soluble oligomers into large, off-pathway aggregates that are non-toxic. Moreover, Class IA molecules also remodel amyloid fibrils into the same off-pathway structures, whereas Class IB molecules fail to remodel fibrils but accelerate aggregation of freshly disaggregated Aβ. In contrast, a Class II molecule converts soluble Aβ oligomers into fibrils, but is inactive against disaggregated and fibrillar Aβ. Class III molecules disassemble soluble oligomers (as well as fibrils) into low molecular weight species that are non-toxic. Strikingly, Aβ non-toxic oligomers (which are morphologically indistinguishable from toxic soluble oligomers) are significantly more resistant to being remodeled than Aβ soluble oligomers or amyloid fibrils. Our findings reveal that relatively subtle differences in small molecule structure encipher surprisingly large differences in the pathways they employ to remodel Aβ soluble oligomers and related aggregated conformers.
在从阿尔茨海默病到帕金森病等蛋白质构象疾病中,无关联序列的蛋白质错误折叠成类似的聚集构象,范围从小寡聚物到大淀粉样纤维。大量证据表明,小的、前纤维状寡聚物是最具毒性的物种,但在多大程度上可以使用小分子选择性地靶向它们并将其重塑为非毒性构象尚不清楚。我们已经评估了针对与阿尔茨海默病相关的成熟可溶性寡聚物的各种芳香族小分子的构象特异性和重塑途径。我们发现,小分子拮抗剂可以根据它们用于将可溶性寡聚物重塑为具有降低毒性的多种构象的不同途径分为三类,我们在此将其定义为 I 类、II 类和 III 类分子。I 类分子将可溶性寡聚物重塑为大的、非途径聚集物,这些聚集物没有毒性。此外,IA 类分子还将淀粉样纤维重塑为相同的非途径结构,而 IB 类分子不能重塑纤维,但会加速新解聚的 Aβ的聚集。相比之下,II 类分子将可溶性 Aβ寡聚物转化为纤维,但对解聚和纤维状 Aβ无效。III 类分子将可溶性寡聚物(以及纤维)分解成低分子量物质,这些物质没有毒性。引人注目的是,可溶性 Aβ寡聚物(在形态上与有毒的可溶性寡聚物无法区分)比 Aβ可溶性寡聚物或淀粉样纤维更难被重塑。我们的发现表明,小分子结构的相对细微差异包含了它们用于重塑 Aβ可溶性寡聚物和相关聚集构象的途径中惊人的巨大差异。