Lowrance William T, Tarin Tatum V, Shariat Shahrokh F
Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2010 Nov 16;10:2228-37. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2010.218.
The rapid adoption of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) has occurred despite a lack of high-quality evidence demonstrating its oncologic advantages, safety, or cost effectiveness compared with open radical retropubic prostatectomy (ORP). This review examines the current literature comparing ORP and RALP, focusing on perioperative, oncologic, functional, and economic outcomes.
尽管缺乏高质量证据证明机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RALP)与开放性耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术(ORP)相比在肿瘤学优势、安全性或成本效益方面的优势,但该手术仍被迅速采用。本综述研究了比较ORP和RALP的当前文献,重点关注围手术期、肿瘤学、功能和经济结果。