Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Center/Sophia Children's Hospital, PO Box 2060, 3000 CB, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 May 1;115(1-2):35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.10.008. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
The aims of the present study were to determine the direct effect of DRD2 and DRD4, as well as their interaction with parenting (i.e. rejection, overprotection and emotional warmth), on the development of regular alcohol and cannabis use in 1192 Dutch adolescents from the general population.
Information was obtained by self-report questionnaires. Perceived rejection, overprotection and emotional warmth were assessed at age 10-12. Regular alcohol and cannabis use were determined at age 15-18 and defined as the consumption of alcohol on 10 or more occasions in the past four weeks, and the use of cannabis on 4 or more occasions in the past four weeks. Models were adjusted for age, sex, parental alcohol or cannabis use, and externalizing behavior.
Carrying the A1 allele of the DRD2 TaqIA polymorphism, or the 7 repeat DRD4, was not directly related to regular alcohol or cannabis use. In addition, adolescent carriers of these genetic risk markers were not more susceptible to the influence of less optimal parenting. Main effects for parenting indicated that overprotection increased the risk of regular alcohol use, whereas the risk of cannabis use was enhanced by parental rejection and buffered by emotional warmth.
Our findings do not support an association between DRD2/DRD4 and regular alcohol and cannabis use in adolescents. Given the substance-specific influences of rejection, overprotection and emotional warmth, these parenting factors might be promising candidates for prevention work.
本研究旨在确定 DRD2 和 DRD4 的直接作用,以及它们与养育方式(即拒绝、过度保护和情感温暖)的相互作用,对 1192 名来自普通人群的荷兰青少年定期饮酒和使用大麻的发展的影响。
通过自我报告问卷获得信息。在 10-12 岁时评估感知到的拒绝、过度保护和情感温暖。定期饮酒和使用大麻是在 15-18 岁时确定的,定义为过去四周内饮酒 10 次或以上,以及过去四周内使用大麻 4 次或以上。模型调整了年龄、性别、父母的酒精或大麻使用情况以及外化行为。
携带 DRD2 TaqIA 多态性的 A1 等位基因或 7 重复 DRD4 与定期饮酒或使用大麻没有直接关系。此外,携带这些遗传风险标记物的青少年对不太理想的养育方式的影响并不敏感。养育方式的主要影响表明,过度保护会增加定期饮酒的风险,而父母的拒绝会增加使用大麻的风险,而情感温暖则会缓冲这种风险。
我们的研究结果不支持 DRD2/DRD4 与青少年定期饮酒和使用大麻之间的关联。鉴于拒绝、过度保护和情感温暖对物质的特异性影响,这些养育因素可能是预防工作的有前途的候选因素。