Suppr超能文献

科学共享的本质。

The essential nature of sharing in science.

机构信息

Survival Skills and Ethics Program, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3500 Fifth Ave., Suite 202, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Dec;16(4):783-99. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9239-x. Epub 2010 Nov 25.

Abstract

Advances in science are the combined result of the efforts of a great many scientists, and in many cases, their willingness to share the products of their research. These products include data sets, both small and large, and unique research resources not commercially available, such as cell lines and software programs. The sharing of these resources enhances both the scope and the depth of research, while making more efficient use of time and money. However, sharing is not without costs, many of which are borne by the individual who develops the research resource. Sharing, for example, reduces the uniqueness of the resources available to a scientist, potentially influencing the originator's perceived productivity and ultimately his or her competitiveness for jobs, promotions, and grants. Nevertheless, for most researchers-particularly those using public funds-sharing is no longer optional but must be considered an obligation to science, the funding agency, and ultimately society at large. Most funding agencies, journals, and professional societies now require a researcher who has published work involving a unique resource to make that resource available to other investigators. Changes could be implemented to mitigate some of the costs. The creator of the resource could explore the possibility of collaborating with those who request it. In addition, institutions that employ and fund researchers could change their policies and practices to make sharing a more attractive and viable option. For example, when evaluating an individual's productivity, institutions could provide credit for the impact a researcher has had on their field through the provision of their unique resources to other investigators, regardless of whether that impact is reflected in the researcher's list of publications. In addition, increased funding for the development and maintenance of user-friendly public repositories for data and research resources would also help to reduce barriers to sharing by minimizing the time, effort, and funding needed by individual investigators to comply with requests for their unique resource. Indeed, sharing is an imperative, but it is also essential to find ways to protect for both the original owner of the resource and those wishing to share it.

摘要

科学的进步是众多科学家共同努力的结果,在许多情况下,他们愿意分享研究成果。这些成果包括数据集,无论是小的还是大的,以及独特的、非商业可得的研究资源,如细胞系和软件程序。这些资源的共享不仅增强了研究的广度和深度,而且还提高了时间和资金的使用效率。然而,共享并非没有代价,其中许多代价由开发研究资源的个人承担。例如,共享会降低可用资源的独特性,这可能会影响资源创建者的感知生产力,并最终影响其在工作、晋升和资助方面的竞争力。尽管如此,对于大多数研究人员来说——尤其是那些使用公共资金的研究人员——共享不再是可选的,而是必须被视为对科学、资助机构以及最终整个社会的责任。大多数资助机构、期刊和专业学会现在要求发表涉及独特资源的研究工作的研究人员,将这些资源提供给其他研究人员。可以实施一些变革来减轻部分代价。资源创建者可以探索与请求者合作的可能性。此外,雇用和资助研究人员的机构可以改变其政策和做法,使共享成为更具吸引力和可行性的选择。例如,在评估个人的生产力时,机构可以根据研究人员通过向其他研究人员提供独特资源对其所在领域的影响,为他们提供信誉,而不论该影响是否反映在研究人员的出版物列表中。此外,增加用于开发和维护用户友好的数据和研究资源公共存储库的资金,也有助于通过减少个人研究人员为遵守提供独特资源的请求而需要的时间、精力和资金,来降低共享的障碍。事实上,共享是当务之急,但找到既能保护资源原始所有者又能保护希望共享资源的人的方法也同样重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验