Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Dec;91(12):1814-37. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.026.
To describe the effects of communication partner training on persons with aphasia and their communication partners. Specifically the systematic review addressed 3 clinical questions regarding the impact of partner training on language, communication activity and participation, psychosocial adjustment, and quality of life for adults with aphasia and their communication partners.
Twenty-three terms were used to search 12 electronic databases (eg, PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO, PsychArticles, CSA Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index [Web of Science], SUMSearch, TRIP, EMBASE, REHABDATA, National Library for Health, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) and the journal "Aphasiology." References from all relevant articles were hand-searched.
Two reviewers independently applied inclusion criteria to select potential relevant articles from the titles and abstracts of references retrieved by the literature search. The full text of the remaining articles was reviewed by a 5-member panel, resulting in a corpus of 31 studies that met the final inclusion criteria.
Two independent reviewers extracted the descriptive data related to the participants, the intervention, the outcome measures, and the results.
The 5-member review team by consensus classified the studies using the American Academy of Neurology system for classification of evidence (2004).
Evidence shows that communication partner training is effective in improving communication activities and/or participation of the communication partner and is probably effective in improving communication activities and/or participation of persons with chronic aphasia when they are interacting with trained communication partners. There is insufficient evidence to make recommendations related to the impact of partner training on persons with acute aphasia or the impact of training on language impairment, psychosocial adjustment, or quality of life for either the person with aphasia or the communication partner.
描述交流伙伴训练对失语症患者及其交流伙伴的影响。具体而言,系统综述针对以下 3 个临床问题,综述了关于伙伴训练对语言、交流活动和参与、心理社会适应以及失语症患者及其交流伙伴生活质量的影响:1. 成人失语症患者及其交流伙伴接受伙伴训练后语言功能的变化;2. 成人失语症患者及其交流伙伴接受伙伴训练后交流活动和参与情况的变化;3. 成人失语症患者及其交流伙伴接受伙伴训练后心理社会适应和生活质量的变化。
使用 23 个术语对 12 个电子数据库(如 PubMed、CINAHL、PsychINFO、PsychArticles、CSA 语言学和语言行为摘要、社会科学引文索引[Web of Science]、SUMSearch、TRIP、EMBASE、REHABDATA、国家卫生图书馆、Cochrane 系统评价数据库)和期刊“失语症”进行检索。对所有相关文章的参考文献进行手工检索。
两位评审员独立应用纳入标准,根据文献检索中检索到的参考文献的标题和摘要筛选出潜在的相关文章。对其余文章的全文进行了由 5 人组成的专家组评审,最终纳入了 31 项符合最终纳入标准的研究。
两位独立评审员提取了与参与者、干预措施、结局测量和结果相关的描述性数据。
由 5 名评审员组成的评审小组根据美国神经病学学会的证据分类系统(2004 年),通过协商一致对研究进行了分类。
证据表明,交流伙伴训练在提高交流伙伴的交流活动和/或参与方面是有效的,并且在交流伙伴接受训练后,当他们与受过训练的交流伙伴互动时,可能对慢性失语症患者的交流活动和/或参与也有效果。但尚无充分证据推荐交流伙伴训练对急性失语症患者的影响,或推荐训练对失语症患者或交流伙伴的语言障碍、心理社会适应或生活质量的影响。