Suppr超能文献

专业人员和公众:健康研究中的权力还是伙伴关系?

Professionals and the public: power or partnership in health research?

机构信息

Falls and Syncope Service and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre in Ageing, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Apr;18(2):276-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01572.x. Epub 2010 Nov 30.

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Involving members of the public in health research is said to produce higher quality research of greater clinical relevance. However, many of the anecdotal accounts of public involvement published in the academic literature to date have focused on the process of recruiting and involving members of the public and the effect of participation on these individuals rather than on how public involvement influenced the research process or outcomes. To strengthen the evidence base, there is clearly a need for more formal methods of capturing and documenting the impact of public involvement in health research.

METHODS

In the first half of this paper, we discuss the importance of public involvement in health research and critically review the literature to identify current barriers to its successful implementation. In the second half, we present a conceptual model for evaluating and reporting the impact of public involvement in health research. Developed from our examination of the academic literature, we provide empirical support for the model by applying it to our recent experience of conducting a clinically based falls prevention study with members of the public.

RESULTS

The conceptual model presented in this paper proposes key concepts and terminology that promote consistency when evaluating and reporting the impact of public involvement in health research. Reflecting on the experiential learning process, we demonstrate how the model promotes conceptual clarity whilst permitting the degree of flexibility required when working in a diverse culture such as the National Health Service.

CONCLUSION

If more evidence can be provided that public involvement enhances research processes and outcomes, researchers may be less inclined to treat this initiative as something they have to do in order to satisfy funding agencies and regulatory bodies and actively embrace this phenomenon, producing accounts of successful public involvement that transcend current barriers to its successful implementation.

摘要

背景、目的和目标:让公众参与健康研究据称可以产生更高质量、更具临床相关性的研究。然而,迄今为止,学术文献中发表的许多关于公众参与的轶事报道都集中在招募和参与公众的过程以及参与对这些人的影响上,而不是公众参与如何影响研究过程或结果。为了加强证据基础,显然需要更正式的方法来捕捉和记录公众参与健康研究的影响。

方法

在本文的前半部分,我们讨论了公众参与健康研究的重要性,并批判性地回顾了文献,以确定其成功实施的当前障碍。在第二部分,我们提出了一个评估和报告公众参与健康研究影响的概念模型。从我们对学术文献的研究中,我们通过将其应用于我们最近与公众一起进行的基于临床的跌倒预防研究的经验,为该模型提供了实证支持。

结果

本文提出的概念模型提出了关键概念和术语,当评估和报告公众参与健康研究的影响时,这些概念和术语可促进一致性。通过反思体验学习过程,我们展示了该模型如何在促进概念清晰性的同时,允许在国家卫生服务等多元化文化中工作时所需的灵活性程度。

结论

如果能提供更多证据表明公众参与可以增强研究过程和结果,研究人员可能不太倾向于将这一举措视为他们必须为了满足资助机构和监管机构而做的事情,而是积极接受这一现象,产生超越其成功实施当前障碍的成功公众参与的案例。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验