Van de Peer Y, Neefs J M, De Wachter R
Departement Biochemie, Universiteit Antwerpen, Belgium.
J Mol Evol. 1990 May;30(5):463-76. doi: 10.1007/BF02101118.
A tree was constructed from a structurally conserved area in an alignment of 83 small ribosomal subunit sequences of eukaryotic, archaebacterial, eubacterial, plastidial, and mitochondrial origin. The algorithm involved computation and optimization of a dissimilarity matrix. According to the tree, only plant mitochondria belong to the eubacterial primary kingdom, whereas animal, fungal, algal, and ciliate mitochondria branch off from an internal node situated between the tree primary kingdoms. This result is at variance with a parsimony tree of similar size published by Cedergren et al. (J Mol Evol 28:98-112, 1988), which postulates the mitochondria to be monophyletic and to belong to the eubacterial primary kingdom. The discrepancy does not follow from the use of conflicting sequence alignments, hence it must be due to the use of different treeing algorithms. We tested our algorithm on a set of sequences resulting from a simulated evolution and found it capable of faithfully reconstructing a branching topology that involved very unequal evolutionary rates. The use of more limited or more extended areas of the complete sequence alignment, comprising only very conserved or also more variable portions of the small ribosomal subunit structure, does have some influence on the tree topology. In all cases, however, the nonplant mitochondria seem to branch off before the emergence of eubacteria, and the differences are limited to the branching pattern among different types of mitochondria.
基于83个真核生物、古细菌、真细菌、质体和线粒体来源的小核糖体亚基序列比对中的一个结构保守区域构建了一棵树。该算法涉及差异矩阵的计算和优化。根据这棵树,只有植物线粒体属于真细菌原界,而动物、真菌、藻类和纤毛虫线粒体则从位于树原界之间的一个内部节点分支出来。这一结果与Cedergren等人(《分子进化杂志》28:98 - 112, 1988)发表的类似规模的简约树不同,后者假定线粒体是单系的且属于真细菌原界。这种差异并非源于使用了相互冲突的序列比对,因此必定是由于使用了不同的建树算法。我们在一组由模拟进化产生的序列上测试了我们的算法,发现它能够忠实地重建一个涉及非常不均衡进化速率的分支拓扑结构。使用完整序列比对中更有限或更扩展的区域,包括小核糖体亚基结构中仅非常保守或也更可变的部分,确实对树拓扑结构有一些影响。然而,在所有情况下,非植物线粒体似乎在真细菌出现之前就分支出来了,并且差异仅限于不同类型线粒体之间的分支模式。