Cancer Survivor Center for Health and Wellbeing, 1450 Crystal Lake Road, Aspen, CO 81611, USA.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Jun;111(6):1167-76. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1749-3. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
Selected physiological responses, including lactate kinetics, to cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) were evaluated among a group of cancer survivors (CS, n = 55) and healthy controls (HC, n = 213). It was uncertain if lactate testing in a group of cancer survivors could provide useful information about training intensity. It was hypothesized that chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, physical inactivity or some combination thereof would alter the normal lactate kinetics (curvilinearity) in the relationship of lactate concentration versus power. Physiologic responses of CS (heart rate, blood pressure, O(2) saturation, RPE, lactate, VO(2peak), and peak power) during cycle ergometry were compared to HC. Comparisons (t tests and Chi-square) were made between the groups and shape of lactate plots were analyzed for determination of a breakpoint. Multiple logistical regressions were then utilized to identify factors related to the inability to determine lactate breakpoints. Lactate breakpoints were common to all but one HC whereas among the CS there was a small subset of subjects (n = 5) who did not show a lactate breakpoint. Group differences indicated that female CS were significantly older, had greater BMI's, and lower work capacity than HC. Males CS had significantly lower work capacity than HC. Multiple logistical regression analyses, in all instances, yielded no statistically significant models predictive of the inability to determine a lactate breakpoint. In this sample of CS and HC, physiological responses and lactate kinetics during CPET were similar while work capacity among the CS was lower. Because lactate breakpoints were found, lactate threshold could be determined for all but a few individuals. For those working with CS, CPET with ECG monitoring and lactate threshold measures should be considered for those wishing for precise and safe training intensities.
选择生理反应,包括乳酸动力学,心肺运动试验(CPET)进行了评估一组癌症幸存者(CS,n = 55)和健康对照组(HC,n = 213)。这是不确定的,如果在一组癌症幸存者的乳酸测试可以提供有关训练强度的有用信息。假设化疗,放疗,手术,体力活动不足或其组合会改变正常乳酸动力学(曲线)的乳酸浓度与功率的关系。 CS(心率,血压,O2饱和度,RPE,乳酸,VO2峰值和最大功率)在进行测功机运动时的生理反应与 HC 进行了比较。组间比较(t 检验和卡方检验)和乳酸图的形状进行了分析,以确定一个断点。然后利用多元逻辑回归来确定与无法确定乳酸断点相关的因素。乳酸断点对所有 HC 都是常见的,但对 CS 中的一小部分受试者(n = 5)没有显示出乳酸断点。组间差异表明,女性 CS 比 HC 年龄更大,BMI 更高,工作能力更低。男性 CS 的工作能力明显低于 HC。多元逻辑回归分析在所有情况下都没有产生统计学上显著的模型,可预测无法确定乳酸断点。在这个 CS 和 HC 的样本中,CPET 期间的生理反应和乳酸动力学相似,而 CS 的工作能力较低。由于发现了乳酸断点,可以确定所有个体的乳酸阈值,除了少数个体。对于与 CS 合作的人,对于那些希望获得精确和安全的训练强度的人,应该考虑使用 ECG 监测和乳酸阈值测量的 CPET。