• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

隐喻使用与健康素养:一项解释癌症临床试验随机分组策略的初步研究。

Metaphor use and health literacy: a pilot study of strategies to explain randomization in cancer clinical trials.

机构信息

School of Communication, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Health Commun. 2011 Jan;16(1):3-16. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.529494.

DOI:10.1080/10810730.2010.529494
PMID:21128152
Abstract

Patients often have difficulty understanding what randomization is and why it is needed in Phase III clinical trials. Physicians commonly report using metaphorical language to convey the role of chance in being assignment to treatment; however, the effectiveness of this strategy as an educational tool has not been explored. Guided by W. McGuire's (1972) information-processing model, the purpose of this pilot study was to explore effects of metaphors to explain randomization on message acceptance and behavioral intention to participate in a Phase III clinical trial among a sample of low-income, rural women (N = 64). Participants were randomly assigned to watch a video that explained randomization using 1 of 3 message strategies: a low-literacy definition, standard metaphor (i.e., flip of a coin), or a culturally derived metaphor (i.e., sex of a baby). The influence of attention on behavioral intentions to participate in clinical trials was partially moderated by message strategy. Under conditions of low attention, participants in the culturally derived metaphor condition experienced significantly higher intentions to participate in clinical trials compared with participants in the standard metaphor condition. However, as attention increased, differences in intentions among the conditions diminished. Having a positive affective response to the randomization message was a strong, positive predictor of behavioral intentions to participate in clinical trials. The authors discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

摘要

患者通常难以理解什么是随机化以及为什么在 III 期临床试验中需要随机化。医生通常会使用隐喻语言来描述机会在分配治疗中的作用;然而,这种策略作为一种教育工具的有效性尚未得到探索。本研究以 W. McGuire(1972)的信息处理模型为指导,旨在探讨解释随机化的隐喻对低收入、农村妇女样本(N=64)接受信息和参与 III 期临床试验的行为意向的影响。参与者被随机分配观看一段视频,该视频使用 3 种信息策略中的 1 种解释随机化:低识字定义、标准隐喻(即抛硬币)或文化衍生隐喻(即婴儿性别)。注意力对临床试验参与行为意向的影响部分受到信息策略的调节。在注意力较低的情况下,与标准隐喻条件相比,文化衍生隐喻条件下的参与者参与临床试验的意愿显著更高。然而,随着注意力的增加,各条件之间的意愿差异逐渐减小。对随机化信息有积极的情感反应是参与临床试验的强烈积极预测因素。作者讨论了这些发现的理论和实践意义。

相似文献

1
Metaphor use and health literacy: a pilot study of strategies to explain randomization in cancer clinical trials.隐喻使用与健康素养:一项解释癌症临床试验随机分组策略的初步研究。
J Health Commun. 2011 Jan;16(1):3-16. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.529494.
2
Last resort or roll of the die? Exploring the role of metaphors in cancer clinical trials education among medically underserved populations.无奈之举还是孤注一掷?探究隐喻在医疗服务不足人群的癌症临床试验教育中的作用。
J Health Commun. 2014;19(10):1161-77. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.801537. Epub 2013 May 31.
3
Linguistic Strategies for Improving Informed Consent in Clinical Trials Among Low Health Literacy Patients.提高低健康素养患者临床试验中知情同意书质量的语言策略
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Oct 28;109(3). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw233. Print 2017 Mar.
4
Complementary therapy use by cancer patients. Physicians' perceptions, attitudes, and ideas.癌症患者使用补充疗法。医生的看法、态度和观点。
Can Fam Physician. 2004 Jun;50:882-8.
5
Testing an alternate informed consent process.测试一种替代的知情同意程序。
Nurs Res. 2009 Mar-Apr;58(2):135-9. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818c3df5.
6
Improving accrual of older persons to cancer treatment trials: a randomized trial comparing an educational intervention with standard information: CALGB 360001.提高老年人参与癌症治疗试验的入组率:一项比较教育干预与标准信息的随机试验:CALGB 360001
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 1;23(10):2201-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.222.
7
[An index of understanding randomised clinical trials in oncology].[肿瘤学中理解随机临床试验的索引]
Bull Cancer. 2009 Jun;96(6):741-50. doi: 10.1684/bdc.2009.0888.
8
Breast cancer prevention in community clinics: will low-income Latina patients participate in clinical trials?社区诊所中的乳腺癌预防:低收入拉丁裔患者会参与临床试验吗?
Prev Med. 2005 Jun;40(6):611-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.09.004.
9
Health literacy and the provision of information to women with breast cancer.健康素养与乳腺癌女性信息提供
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2011 Apr;23(3):223-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2010.11.010. Epub 2010 Dec 24.
10
Understanding the attitudes of the elderly towards enrolment into cancer clinical trials.了解老年人对参与癌症临床试验的态度。
BMC Cancer. 2006 Feb 8;6:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-34.

引用本文的文献

1
What influences trust in and understanding of clinical trials? An analysis of information and communication technology use and online health behavior from the Health Information National Trends Survey.哪些因素会影响对临床试验的信任和理解?基于健康信息国家趋势调查对信息通信技术使用情况和在线健康行为的分析。
Clin Trials. 2024 Feb;21(1):95-113. doi: 10.1177/17407745231204813. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
2
"Fighting the Ventilator": Abandoning Exclusionary Violence Metaphors in the Intensive Care Unit.“对抗呼吸机”:摒弃重症监护室中排他性的暴力隐喻
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Nov;20(11):1550-1553. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202306-562IP.
3
Patient communication and experiences in cancer clinical drug trials: a mixed-method study at a specialist clinical trials unit.
癌症临床药物试验中的患者沟通和体验:在一个专门临床试验单位的混合方法研究。
Trials. 2023 Jun 13;24(1):400. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07284-2.
4
A Study of a Culturally and Contextually Situated Multimedia Approach to Recruit a Hard-to-Reach Spanish-Speaking Population for a Randomized Control Trial (RCT).一项关于采用文化和情境化多媒体方法招募西班牙语裔难触及人群参与随机对照试验(RCT)的研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Oct;17(4):461-470. doi: 10.1177/15562646221102682. Epub 2022 May 18.
5
What do parents think of using informational videos to support recruitment for parenting trials? A qualitative study.家长如何看待使用信息视频来支持育儿试验的招募?一项定性研究。
Trials. 2021 Dec 4;22(1):872. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05826-0.
6
Beneath the surface: Abstract construal mindset increases receptivity to metaphors in health communications.表象之下:抽象解释思维模式增强了健康传播中对隐喻的接受度。
Soc Cogn. 2019 Jun;37(3):314-340. doi: 10.1521/soco.2019.37.3.314. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
7
Health Communication and Decision Making about Vaccine Clinical Trials during a Pandemic.大流行期间疫苗临床试验的健康传播和决策
J Health Commun. 2020 Oct 2;25(10):780-789. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1864520.
8
Barriers and Strategies for Recruitment of Racial and Ethnic Minorities: Perspectives from Neurological Clinical Research Coordinators.招募少数族裔参与神经科临床研究的障碍与策略:临床研究协调员的观点。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Dec;4(6):1225-1236. doi: 10.1007/s40615-016-0332-y. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
9
Linguistic Strategies for Improving Informed Consent in Clinical Trials Among Low Health Literacy Patients.提高低健康素养患者临床试验中知情同意书质量的语言策略
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Oct 28;109(3). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw233. Print 2017 Mar.
10
Growing-up just like everyone else: key components of a successful pediatric HIV disclosure intervention in Namibia.像其他人一样成长:纳米比亚成功开展儿科艾滋病毒披露干预措施的关键要素
AIDS. 2015 Jun;29 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S81-9. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000667.