Suppr超能文献

在“大爆炸”重大事件中,分诊工具能准确预测临床优先级吗?:文献系统评价。

In 'big bang' major incidents do triage tools accurately predict clinical priority?: a systematic review of the literature.

机构信息

Paramedic Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Coventry University, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Injury. 2011 May;42(5):460-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.005.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The term "big bang" major incidents is used to describe sudden, usually traumatic,catastrophic events, involving relatively large numbers of injured individuals, where demands on clinical services rapidly outstrip the available resources. Triage tools support the pre-hospital provider to prioritise which patients to treat and/or transport first based upon clinical need. The aim of this review is to identify existing triage tools and to determine the extent to which their reliability and validity have been assessed.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify and evaluate published data validating the efficacy of the triage tools. Studies using data from trauma patients that report on the derivation, validation and/or reliability of the specific pre-hospital triage tools were eligible for inclusion.Purely descriptive studies, reviews, exercises or reports (without supporting data) were excluded.

RESULTS

The search yielded 1982 papers. After initial scrutiny of title and abstract, 181 papers were deemed potentially applicable and from these 11 were identified as relevant to this review (in first figure). There were two level of evidence one studies, three level of evidence two studies and six level of evidence three studies. The two level of evidence one studies were prospective validations of Clinical Decision Rules (CDR's) in children in South Africa, all the other studies were retrospective CDR derivation, validation or cohort studies. The quality of the papers was rated as good (n=3), fair (n=7), poor (n=1).

CONCLUSION

There is limited evidence for the validity of existing triage tools in big bang major incidents.Where evidence does exist it focuses on sensitivity and specificity in relation to prediction of trauma death or severity of injury based on data from single or small number patient incidents. The Sacco system is unique in combining survivability modelling with the degree by which the system is overwhelmed in the triage decision system. The practicalities, training implications, performance characteristics and reliance on computer technology during a mass casualty incident require further evaluation.

摘要

简介

“大爆炸”重大事件是指突然发生的、通常是创伤性的、灾难性的事件,涉及相对较多的受伤个体,对临床服务的需求迅速超过可用资源。分诊工具支持院前提供者根据临床需要对需要治疗和/或首先转运的患者进行优先排序。本综述的目的是确定现有的分诊工具,并确定评估其可靠性和有效性的程度。

方法

对文献进行系统综述,以确定和评估验证分诊工具功效的已发表数据。使用创伤患者数据报告特定院前分诊工具的推导、验证和/或可靠性的研究符合纳入标准。仅包括描述性研究、综述、练习或报告(无支持数据)被排除在外。

结果

搜索产生了 1982 篇论文。经过标题和摘要的初步审查,有 181 篇论文被认为可能适用,其中 11 篇被认为与本综述相关(在第一个图中)。有两项一级证据研究,三项二级证据研究和六项三级证据研究。两项一级证据研究是南非儿童临床决策规则(CDR)的前瞻性验证,所有其他研究都是回顾性 CDR 推导、验证或队列研究。论文的质量被评为良好(n=3)、中等(n=7)、差(n=1)。

结论

现有的分诊工具在大爆炸重大事件中的有效性证据有限。现有的证据主要集中在基于单个或少数患者事件的数据预测创伤死亡或损伤严重程度的敏感性和特异性上。Sacco 系统的独特之处在于将生存能力建模与系统在分诊决策系统中被淹没的程度相结合。在大规模伤亡事件中,实际情况、培训影响、性能特征和对计算机技术的依赖需要进一步评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验