Suppr超能文献

近视激光屈光手术后的人工晶状体度数计算:173 只眼中的方法比较。

Intraocular lens power calculations after myopic laser refractive surgery: a comparison of methods in 173 eyes.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2011 May;118(5):940-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.08.048. Epub 2010 Dec 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare published methods of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation after myopic laser refractive surgery in a large, multi-surgeon study.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 173 eyes of 117 patients who had uneventful LASIK (89) or photorefractive keratectomy (84) for myopia and subsequent cataract surgery.

METHODS

Data were collected from primary sources in patient charts. The Clinical History Method (vertex corrected to the corneal plane), the Aramberri Double-K, the Latkany Flat-K, the Feiz and Mannis, the R-Factor, the Corneal Bypass, the Masket (2006), the Haigis-L, and the Shammas.cd postrefractive adjustment methods were evaluated in conjunction with third- and fourth-generation optical vergence formulas, as appropriate. Intraocular lens power required for emmetropia was back-calculated using stable post-cataract surgery manifest refraction and implanted IOL power, and then formula accuracy was compared.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prediction error arithmetic mean ± standard deviation (SD), range (minimum and maximum), and percent within 0 to -1.0 diopters (D), ±0.5 D, ±1.0 D, and ±2.0 D relative to target refraction.

RESULTS

The top 5 corneal power adjustment techniques and formula combinations in terms of mean prediction errors, standard deviations, and minimizing hyperopic "refractive surprises" were the Masket with the Hoffer Q formula, the Shammas.cd with the Shammas-PL formula, the Haigis-L, the Clinical History Method with the Hoffer Q, and the Latkany Flat-K with the SRK/T with mean arithmetic prediction errors and standard deviations of -0.18±0.87 D, -0.10±1.02 D, -0.26±1.13 D, -0.27±1.04 D, and -0.37±0.91 D, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

By using these methods, 70% to 85% of eyes could achieve visual outcomes within 1.0 D of target refraction. The Shammas and the Haigis-L methods have the advantage of not requiring potentially inaccurate historical information.

摘要

目的

在一项多医生的大型研究中,评估和比较近视激光屈光手术后眼内晶状体(IOL)计算的已发表方法。

设计

回顾性病例系列。

参与者

共 117 例患者的 173 只眼,这些患者均行 LASIK(89 只眼)或光折射性角膜切除术(84 只眼)治疗近视,随后行白内障手术。

方法

从患者病历的原始资料中收集数据。临床病史法(校正至角膜平面的顶点)、Aramberri 双 K 法、Latkany 平 K 法、Feiz 和 Mannis 法、R 因子法、角膜旁路法、Masket(2006 年)法、Haigis-L 法和 Shammas.cd 屈光后调整方法与第三代和第四代光聚合公式相结合进行评估。通过稳定的白内障手术后眼前节和植入的 IOL 屈光力来反算所需的 IOL 屈光力,以预测正视眼,然后比较公式的准确性。

主要观察指标

预测误差算术平均值±标准差(SD)、范围(最小和最大)以及屈光度在 0 至-1.0 (D)、±0.5 D、±1.0 D 和±2.0 D 范围内的百分比。

结果

在平均预测误差、标准差和最小化远视“屈光意外”方面,前 5 名角膜屈光调整技术和公式组合分别是 Masket 联合 Hoffer Q 公式、Shammas.cd 联合 Shammas-PL 公式、Haigis-L 法、Clinical History Method 联合 Hoffer Q 公式和 Latkany Flat-K 联合 SRK/T 公式,平均算术预测误差和标准差分别为-0.18±0.87 D、-0.10±1.02 D、-0.26±1.13 D、-0.27±1.04 D 和-0.37±0.91 D。

结论

使用这些方法,70%至 85%的眼可以达到 1.0 D 以内的目标屈光度。Shammas 和 Haigis-L 方法的优点是不需要潜在不准确的历史信息。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验