Johnson Laura S, Shupp Jeffrey W, Pavlovich Anna R, Pezzullo John C, Jeng James C, Jordan Marion H
The Burn Center, Department of Surgery, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
J Burn Care Res. 2011 Jan-Feb;32(1):13-9. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318204b3ab.
Length of stay (LOS) continues to be a standard variable when evaluating progress and outcomes in burn care. Common wisdom would dictate that this measure is linearly related to TBSA. Is this truly the case? A retrospective review of the National Burn Repository was conducted to evaluate factors that affect hospital LOS. The National Burn Repository data set was obtained from the American Burn Association. Data from the years 2002-2007 were extracted. Unique patients were identified by removing readmissions, outpatients, and patients not admitted. Patients whose "HOSPLOS" and/or "AREATOT" field was blank or 0 were excluded, as were nonthermally injured patients. Patients without an entry for age and dead patients were also excluded. This left a final data set of 52,712 patients for analysis. The data were then analyzed, with %TBSA burned as the independent variable. In patients who survived their entire LOS, the mean LOS increased linearly by decile. Females with a TBSA <40% have a trend toward increased LOS relative to their male counterparts of the same TBSA; however, this trend reverses for TBSA ≥40%. Age alone is not a significant predictor of increasing LOS. The cause of burns was predominantly flame related across all deciles of TBSA, and most etiologies for burn demonstrate the predicted increase in LOS per %TBSA. LOS was not significantly affected by insurance type or whether the injury was work related or not. This analysis was confounded by the small numbers of patients with burns >60% and age older than 70 years. Anticipating hospital LOS is not a simple task. Using complex statistical analysis, a linear trend associated with %TBSA can be seen; however, other variables do contribute. Until the precise role of these variables can be elucidated, anticipating patient LOS to be 1 day for every %TBSA is still a useful exercise.
住院时间(LOS)仍然是评估烧伤治疗进展和结果的一个标准变量。一般认为,这一指标与烧伤总面积(TBSA)呈线性关系。实际情况果真如此吗?为了评估影响住院时间的因素,对国家烧伤资料库进行了一项回顾性研究。国家烧伤资料库数据集来自美国烧伤协会。提取了2002年至2007年的数据。通过排除再次入院患者、门诊患者和未入院患者来确定唯一患者。“住院时间”(“HOSPLOS”)和/或“总面积”(“AREATOT”)字段为空或为0的患者被排除,非热损伤患者也被排除。没有年龄记录的患者和死亡患者也被排除。最终留下52712例患者的数据集用于分析。然后以烧伤TBSA百分比作为自变量对数据进行分析。在整个住院期间存活的患者中,平均住院时间按十分位数呈线性增加。TBSA<40%的女性相对于相同TBSA的男性有住院时间增加的趋势;然而,对于TBSA≥40%的情况,这种趋势则相反。仅年龄并不是住院时间增加的显著预测因素。在TBSA的所有十分位数中,烧伤原因主要与火焰有关,并且大多数烧伤病因显示出每增加1%TBSA住院时间的预期增加。住院时间不受保险类型或损伤是否与工作相关的显著影响。这项分析因烧伤面积>60%且年龄大于70岁的患者数量较少而受到干扰。预测住院时间并非易事。通过复杂的统计分析,可以看到与TBSA百分比相关的线性趋势;然而,其他变量也有影响。在这些变量的确切作用得到阐明之前,预计每1%TBSA的患者住院时间为1天仍然是一项有用的做法。