• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共卫生学术-实践伙伴关系,以发展锻炼评估和改善计划能力。

A public health academic-practice partnership to develop capacity for exercise evaluation and improvement planning.

机构信息

Heartland Center for Public Health Preparedness, School of Public Health, Saint Louis University, 3545 Lafayette Ave., St. Louis, MO 63104, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2010 Nov-Dec;125 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):107-16. doi: 10.1177/00333549101250S515.

DOI:10.1177/00333549101250S515
PMID:21133067
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2966652/
Abstract

In December 2006, Congress passed the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act to improve the nation's public health preparedness and response capabilities. It includes the role of Centers for Public Health Preparedness (CPHPs) to establish a competency-based core curriculum and perform evaluation of impact on newly developed materials. The Heartland Center for Public Health Preparedness (HCPHP) at the Saint Louis University School of Public Health is part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention national CPHP network and is engaged with state and regional partners in workforce development, preparedness planning, evaluation, and multi-year exercise and training cycles. This includes development, implementation, and evaluation of the HCPHP Exercise Evaluation Training Program to improve the competence and capacity for exercise evaluation and improvement planning. This program is designed to enhance quality improvement and performance measurement capabilities to identify increase of workforce competence over time (maturity).

摘要

2006 年 12 月,国会通过了《大流行性流感和所有灾害防备法案》,以提高美国的公共卫生防备和应对能力。它包括公共卫生防备中心(CPHPs)的作用,以建立基于能力的核心课程,并对新开发的材料的影响进行评估。圣路易斯大学公共卫生学院的中心地带公共卫生防备中心(HCPHP)是疾病控制与预防中心全国 CPHP 网络的一部分,与州和地区合作伙伴合作开展劳动力发展、防备规划、评估以及多年的演习和培训周期。这包括开发、实施和评估 HCPHP 演习评估培训计划,以提高演习评估和改进规划的能力。该计划旨在增强质量改进和绩效衡量能力,以确定随着时间的推移(成熟度)劳动力能力的提高。

相似文献

1
A public health academic-practice partnership to develop capacity for exercise evaluation and improvement planning.公共卫生学术-实践伙伴关系,以发展锻炼评估和改善计划能力。
Public Health Rep. 2010 Nov-Dec;125 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):107-16. doi: 10.1177/00333549101250S515.
2
A brief history and overview of CDC's Centers for Public Health Preparedness Cooperative Agreement Program.美国疾病预防控制中心公共卫生准备合作协议计划的简要历史和概述。
Public Health Rep. 2010 Nov-Dec;125 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):8-14. doi: 10.1177/00333549101250S503.
3
Regional approach to building operational level capacity for disaster planning: the case of the Eastern Africa region.建设灾害规划业务层面能力的区域方法:以东部非洲地区为例。
East Afr J Public Health. 2013 Jun;10(2):447-58.
4
Public health-specific National Incident Management System trainings: building a system for preparedness.公共卫生特定国家事件管理系统培训:建立备灾系统。
Public Health Rep. 2010 Nov-Dec;125 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):43-50. doi: 10.1177/00333549101250S507.
5
Preparedness and Emergency Response Learning Centers: supporting the workforce for national health security.防范与应急响应学习中心:为国家卫生安全保障人力提供支持。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Sep-Oct;20 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S7-16. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000107.
6
Facilitators and Barriers for Effective Academic-Community Collaboration for Disaster Preparedness and Response.有效开展学术机构与社区合作以进行灾害防范与应对的促进因素和障碍
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 May-Jun;22(3):E20-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182205087.
7
Evaluation of a federally funded workforce development program: the Centers for Public Health Preparedness.对一项由联邦资助的劳动力发展计划的评估:公共卫生防范中心。
Eval Program Plann. 2013 Apr;37:50-7. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
8
Identification and evaluation of mental health and psychosocial preparedness resources from the Centers for Public Health Preparedness.对公共卫生防范中心的心理健康及心理社会防范资源进行识别与评估。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2005 Nov;Suppl:S138-42. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200511001-00025.
9
The Preparedness and Emergency Response Learning Centers: advancing standardized evaluation of public health preparedness and response trainings.应急准备与响应学习中心:推进公共卫生应急准备与响应培训的标准化评估
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Sep-Oct;20 Suppl 5:S17-23. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000066.
10
An innovation in partnership among first responders and public health: bridging the gap.急救人员与公共卫生部门合作的一项创新:弥合差距。
Public Health Rep. 2005;120 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):64-8. doi: 10.1177/00333549051200S113.

引用本文的文献

1
Monitoring and evaluation in disaster management courses: a scoping review.灾害管理课程中的监测与评估:一项范围综述
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 6;25(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06659-0.
2
Opportunity knocks but twice for Public Health Preparedness Centers.公共卫生防范中心的机会只有两次。
Public Health Rep. 2010 Nov-Dec;125 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):1-3. doi: 10.1177/00333549101250S501.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing public health emergency preparedness: concepts, tools, and challenges.评估公共卫生应急准备:概念、工具与挑战。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:1-18. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144054.
2
Role of exercises and drills in the evaluation of public health in emergency response.演习和操练在应急响应公共卫生评估中的作用
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006 May-Jun;21(3):173-82. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00003642.
3
Public health preparedness: evolution or revolution?公共卫生防范:演进还是变革?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Jul-Aug;25(4):935-45. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.4.935.
4
Partnering for preparedness: the project public health ready experience.携手合作,做好准备:“项目公共卫生就绪”经验
Public Health Rep. 2005;120 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):69-75. doi: 10.1177/00333549051200S114.
5
The MACH Model: from competencies to instruction and performance of the public health workforce.MACH模型:从公共卫生人力的能力到指导与绩效
Public Health Rep. 2005;120 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9-15. doi: 10.1177/00333549051200S104.
6
The use of trained observers as an evaluation tool for a multi-hospital bioterrorism exercise.使用经过培训的观察员作为多医院生物恐怖主义演习的评估工具。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):159-63. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x00002387.