• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜胆囊切除术后医院有无外科住院医师培训项目的胆管损伤:有区别吗?

Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in hospitals with and without surgical residency programs: is there a difference?

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, L223A, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2011 Jun;25(6):1969-74. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1495-y. Epub 2010 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-010-1495-y
PMID:21136094
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a common surgical procedure performed by surgical residents under the supervision of attending surgeons. There is a perception that performance of LC in a facility with a surgical training program provides a safer environment due to the presence of an assistant surgeon. The aim of this study was to compare the rate of bile duct injury, conversion, and mortality between hospitals with surgical residency programs (Group I) and hospitals without surgical training programs (Group II).

METHODS

ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes were used to extract and analyze LC procedures from the Florida State Inpatient Database from 1997 through 2006. Bile duct injury was indicated by the code for a biliary reconstruction procedure performed during the same admission. Hospitals with surgical training programs were identified by participation in the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) and verified by contact with each hospital.

RESULTS

Between 1997 and 2006 there were 234,220 LCs identified, with 17,596 performed by Group I and 213,906 performed by Group II. Rate of BDI for Group I and Group II was 0.24 and 0.26%, respectively (p=0.71). There was a significant difference noted in emergency and urgent admission rates (65.6% for Group I vs. 77.2% for Group II; p<0.001) and conversion (9.1% for Group I vs. 7.5% for Group II; p<0.001). Mortality was 0.44% for Group I and 0.55% for Group II (p=0.060).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that bile duct injury rates are not influenced by the presence of a surgical residency program. In addition, there was no significant difference in mortality for LC at hospitals with surgical residencies when compared to hospitals without surgical residencies. A significant difference was noted in admission type and conversion rate but this did not appear to affect the rate of bile duct injury.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是一种常见的手术程序,由外科住院医师在主治外科医生的监督下进行。人们认为,在有外科培训计划的设施中进行 LC 手术由于有辅助外科医生的存在,因此环境更安全。本研究的目的是比较有外科住院医师培训计划的医院(I 组)和没有外科培训计划的医院(II 组)之间胆管损伤、中转开腹和死亡率的发生率。

方法

使用 ICD-9 诊断和手术代码从 1997 年至 2006 年从佛罗里达州住院患者数据库中提取并分析 LC 手术。同一住院期间进行胆道重建手术的代码表示胆管损伤。通过参与电子住院医师申请服务(ERAS)确定有外科住院医师培训计划的医院,并通过与每家医院联系进行验证。

结果

在 1997 年至 2006 年间,共确定了 234220 例 LC 手术,其中 I 组进行了 17596 例,II 组进行了 213906 例。I 组和 II 组的 BDI 发生率分别为 0.24%和 0.26%(p=0.71)。I 组和 II 组的急诊和紧急入院率(I 组为 65.6%,II 组为 77.2%;p<0.001)和中转开腹率(I 组为 9.1%,II 组为 7.5%;p<0.001)有显著差异。I 组和 II 组的死亡率分别为 0.44%和 0.55%(p=0.060)。

结论

我们的数据表明,胆管损伤发生率不受外科住院医师培训计划的影响。此外,与没有外科住院医师的医院相比,有外科住院医师的医院进行 LC 手术的死亡率没有显著差异。入院类型和中转开腹率有显著差异,但这似乎并未影响胆管损伤的发生率。

相似文献

1
Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in hospitals with and without surgical residency programs: is there a difference?腹腔镜胆囊切除术后医院有无外科住院医师培训项目的胆管损伤:有区别吗?
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jun;25(6):1969-74. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1495-y. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
2
Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆管损伤:一项全国性调查结果
Ann Surg. 2001 Oct;234(4):549-58; discussion 558-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00014.
3
Decreased bile duct injury rate during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the era of the 80-hour resident workweek.在住院医师每周工作80小时的时代,腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆管损伤率降低。
Arch Surg. 2008 Sep;143(9):847-51; discussion 851. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.9.847.
4
Threefold increased bile duct injury rate is associated with less surgeon experience in an insurance claims database: more rigorous training in biliary surgery may be needed.在一个保险理赔数据库中,胆管损伤率增加三倍与外科医生经验较少有关:可能需要对胆道手术进行更严格的培训。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Nov;28(11):3068-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3580-0. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
5
The dramatic reality of biliary tract injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An anonymous multicenter Belgian survey of 65 patients.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆道损伤的严峻现实。比利时一项针对65例患者的匿名多中心调查。
Surg Endosc. 1997 Dec;11(12):1171-8. doi: 10.1007/s004649900563.
6
Bile duct injuries (BDI) in the advanced laparoscopic cholecystectomy era.胆管损伤(BDI)在腹腔镜胆囊切除术的先进时代。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):724-730. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6333-7. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
7
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of our training programme.腹腔镜胆囊切除术:我们培训计划的一次审核
ANZ J Surg. 2005 Apr;75(4):231-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03370.x.
8
Concurrent Biliary Disease Increases the Risk for Conversion and Bile Duct Injury in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Analysis at a County Teaching Hospital.合并胆道疾病增加腹腔镜胆囊切除术中转开腹及胆管损伤风险:某县级教学医院的回顾性分析
Am Surg. 2017 Oct 1;83(10):1024-1028.
9
Surgeons' anonymous response after bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.胆囊切除术中胆管损伤后外科医生的匿名回应。
Am J Surg. 2003 May;185(5):468-75. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(03)00056-4.
10
How, when, and why bile duct injury occurs. A comparison between open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.胆管损伤是如何、何时以及为何发生的。开腹胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 1998 Apr;12(4):322-6. doi: 10.1007/s004649900662.

引用本文的文献

1
2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.2020 WSES 指南:胆囊切除术胆道损伤的检测与处理。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Jun 10;16(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00369-w.
2
Safe cholecystectomy multi-society practice guideline and state-of-the-art consensus conference on prevention of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.安全胆囊切除术多学会实践指南和预防胆囊切除术中胆管损伤的最新共识会议。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2827-2855. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07568-7. Epub 2020 May 12.
3
Application of "three lines and one plane" as anatomic landmarks in laparoscopic surgery for bile duct stones.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk tolerance and bile duct injury: surgeon characteristics, risk-taking preference, and common bile duct injuries.风险承受能力与胆管损伤:外科医生特征、冒险偏好及胆总管损伤
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Jul;209(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.02.063. Epub 2009 May 1.
2
The timing of surgery for cholecystitis: a review of 202 consecutive patients at a large municipal hospital.胆囊炎手术时机:一家大型市立医院202例连续病例的回顾
Am J Surg. 2008 Apr;195(4):467-70. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.04.015.
3
Referral pattern and timing of repair are risk factors for complications after reconstructive surgery for bile duct injury.
“三线一面”作为解剖标志在胆管结石腹腔镜手术中的应用
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(16):e0155. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010155.
4
Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Trainees: Predictors and Results in an Academic Teaching Hospital.困难腹腔镜胆囊切除术与实习生:一所学术教学医院的预测因素及结果
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:6467814. doi: 10.1155/2017/6467814. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
5
Microcomplications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: impact on duration of surgery and costs.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的微小并发症:对手术时长和费用的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2512-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4512-3. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
6
Major bile duct injury requiring operative reconstruction after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a follow-on study.腹腔镜胆囊切除术后需手术重建的主要胆管损伤:一项随访研究。
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1839-46. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4469-2. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
7
Outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in octogenarians.八旬老人行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果
JSLS. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):271-5. doi: 10.4293/108680812x13427982376428.
转诊模式和修复时机是胆管损伤重建手术后并发症的危险因素。
Ann Surg. 2007 May;245(5):763-70. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000252442.91839.44.
4
Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database.腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者围手术期并发症的危险因素:对瑞士腹腔镜与胸腔镜外科学会数据库中22953例连续病例的分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Nov;203(5):723-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.07.018. Epub 2006 Sep 20.
5
Ten-year trend in the national volume of bile duct injuries requiring operative repair.需要手术修复的胆管损伤全国病例数的十年趋势。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Jul;19(7):967-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-004-8942-6. Epub 2005 May 12.
6
Long-term detrimental effect of bile duct injury on health-related quality of life.胆管损伤对健康相关生活质量的长期有害影响。
Arch Surg. 2004 May;139(5):476-81; discussion 481-2. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.5.476.
7
Differences in operative mortality between high- and low-volume hospitals in Ontario for 5 major surgical procedures: estimating the number of lives potentially saved through regionalization.安大略省高手术量医院和低手术量医院在5种主要外科手术中的手术死亡率差异:估算通过区域化可能挽救的生命数量。
CMAJ. 2003 May 27;168(11):1409-14.
8
Intraoperative cholangiography and risk of common bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.术中胆管造影与胆囊切除术期间胆总管损伤的风险
JAMA. 2003 Apr 2;289(13):1639-44. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.13.1639.
9
Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.美国医院的手术量与手术死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 11;346(15):1128-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa012337.
10
Impaired quality of life 5 years after bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆管损伤5年后的生活质量受损:一项前瞻性分析。
Ann Surg. 2001 Dec;234(6):750-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200112000-00006.