• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一个保险理赔数据库中,胆管损伤率增加三倍与外科医生经验较少有关:可能需要对胆道手术进行更严格的培训。

Threefold increased bile duct injury rate is associated with less surgeon experience in an insurance claims database: more rigorous training in biliary surgery may be needed.

作者信息

Schwaitzberg Steven D, Scott Daniel J, Jones Daniel B, McKinley Sophia K, Castrillion Johanna, Hunter Tina D, Michael Brunt L

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA,

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2014 Nov;28(11):3068-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3580-0. Epub 2014 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-014-3580-0
PMID:24902815
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Bile duct injury (BDI) remains the dreaded complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) over the last two decades. Although the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) certification is now required for new applicants by the American Board of Surgery, the impact of FLS on procedure-specific outcomes is unknown. Moreover, the FLS content centers on fundamental education and not procedure-specific complication reduction such as BDI, magnifying the importance of understanding the educational impact of FLS on specific case types. This study reviewed the impact of FLS certification and other factors on the incidence of bile duct injury in a large insurance claims database.

METHODS

In total, 53,632 LCs were reviewed from July 2009 to December 2010 from a large private payer claims database. Surgeon National Provider Identifier (NPI), FLS certification status, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) were available for each event. Each record was analyzed for evidence of any bile duct injury based on associated CPT or ICD-9 data in the claim record. Characteristics of the FLS+ and FLS- surgeon groups were analyzed by a separate reviewer blinded to clinical outcome on a large scale.

RESULTS

A total of 53,632 LCs were reviewed; 1748 LC were performed by 441 FLS+ surgeons; and 58,870 LCs by 10,851 FLS- surgeons. (Some procedures involved more than one surgeon). Eighty-two BDIs were identified: 8 in the FLS+ and 74 in the FLS- group. The FLS+ group had a higher rate of BDI than the FLS- group (0.47 vs. 0.14 %, p = 0.0013); however, the FLS+ group was also younger (mean age 38.2 FLS+ vs. 50.4 years) and had significantly fewer years in practice (FLS+ = 6.1 vs. FLS- = 20.7, p = 0.0012). No other complications showed differences between the groups.

CONCLUSION

NPI can be used as a linking intermediary between skills certification and outcomes on claims databases. FLS certification was not associated with a reduction in bile duct injury in this analysis, but FLS+ surgeons were also younger and less experienced overall. Since FLS lacks content specific to BDI, large-scale validated training and assessment programs targeted at BDI prevention are needed to impact the rate of this complication during cholecystectomy.

摘要

引言

在过去二十年中,胆管损伤(BDI)仍然是腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)令人恐惧的并发症。尽管美国外科委员会现在要求新申请人获得腹腔镜手术基础(FLS)认证,但FLS对特定手术结果的影响尚不清楚。此外,FLS的内容集中在基础教育上,而不是减少特定手术的并发症,如BDI,这凸显了了解FLS对特定病例类型的教育影响的重要性。本研究在一个大型保险理赔数据库中回顾了FLS认证和其他因素对胆管损伤发生率的影响。

方法

从一个大型私人支付者理赔数据库中回顾了2009年7月至2010年12月期间的53632例LC。每个事件都有外科医生国家提供者标识符(NPI)、FLS认证状态、国际疾病分类第九版(ICD-9)和当前手术术语(CPT)。根据理赔记录中相关的CPT或ICD-9数据,对每条记录进行分析,以寻找任何胆管损伤的证据。由一位对临床结果不知情的独立审阅者大规模分析FLS+和FLS-外科医生组的特征。

结果

共回顾了53632例LC;441名FLS+外科医生进行了1748例LC;10851名FLS-外科医生进行了58870例LC。(有些手术涉及不止一名外科医生)。共确定了82例BDI:FLS+组8例,FLS-组74例。FLS+组的BDI发生率高于FLS-组(0.47%对0.14%,p = 0.0013);然而,FLS+组也更年轻(平均年龄38.2岁对50.4岁),并且从业年限明显更少(FLS+ = 6.1年对FLS- = 20.7年,p = 0.0012)。两组之间的其他并发症没有差异。

结论

NPI可作为技能认证与理赔数据库结果之间的连接中介。在本分析中,FLS认证与胆管损伤的减少无关,但FLS+外科医生总体上也更年轻且经验不足。由于FLS缺乏针对BDI的特定内容,需要有针对BDI预防的大规模有效培训和评估项目,以影响胆囊切除术中这种并发症的发生率。

相似文献

1
Threefold increased bile duct injury rate is associated with less surgeon experience in an insurance claims database: more rigorous training in biliary surgery may be needed.在一个保险理赔数据库中,胆管损伤率增加三倍与外科医生经验较少有关:可能需要对胆道手术进行更严格的培训。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Nov;28(11):3068-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3580-0. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
2
Bile duct injuries: a contemporary survey of surgeon attitudes and experiences.胆管损伤:外科医生态度和经验的当代调查。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3079-3084. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07056-7. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
3
Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆管损伤:一项全国性调查结果
Ann Surg. 2001 Oct;234(4):549-58; discussion 558-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00014.
4
Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in hospitals with and without surgical residency programs: is there a difference?腹腔镜胆囊切除术后医院有无外科住院医师培训项目的胆管损伤:有区别吗?
Surg Endosc. 2011 Jun;25(6):1969-74. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1495-y. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
5
Bile duct injuries associated with laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: an 11-year experience in one institute.腹腔镜胆囊切除术和开腹胆囊切除术相关的胆管损伤:一所机构11年的经验
Surg Today. 2005;35(10):841-5. doi: 10.1007/s00595-005-3038-z.
6
Prevention of bile duct injury: the case for incorporating educational theories of expertise.胆管损伤的预防:引入专业技能教育理论的理由
Surg Endosc. 2014 Dec;28(12):3385-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3605-8. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
7
How, when, and why bile duct injury occurs. A comparison between open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy.胆管损伤是如何、何时以及为何发生的。开腹胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 1998 Apr;12(4):322-6. doi: 10.1007/s004649900662.
8
Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: myth or reality of the learning curve?腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的胆管损伤:学习曲线的神话还是现实?
Surg Endosc. 2000 Jul;14(7):608-11. doi: 10.1007/s004640000103.
9
The dramatic reality of biliary tract injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. An anonymous multicenter Belgian survey of 65 patients.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中胆道损伤的严峻现实。比利时一项针对65例患者的匿名多中心调查。
Surg Endosc. 1997 Dec;11(12):1171-8. doi: 10.1007/s004649900563.
10
Intraoperative management and repair of bile duct injuries sustained during 10,123 laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a high-volume referral center.在一家高容量转诊中心,对 10123 例腹腔镜胆囊切除术中发生的胆管损伤进行术中管理和修复。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 May;216(5):894-901. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.01.051. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and financial impact of a 'difficult' laparoscopic cholecystectomy.“困难”腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床及经济影响
ANZ J Surg. 2025 May;95(5):926-933. doi: 10.1111/ans.70113. Epub 2025 Apr 24.
2
The Hanging Strap Method: A Safe and Easy-to-Use Surgical Technique for Surgeons-in-Training Performing Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.悬吊带法:一种供实习外科医生在进行困难腹腔镜胆囊切除术时使用的安全且简便的手术技术。
Cureus. 2024 Aug 12;16(8):e66739. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66739. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Standardization of a goal-oriented approach to acute cholecystitis: easy-to-follow steps for performing subtotal cholecystectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
The general surgery job market: analysis of current demand for general surgeons and their specialized skills.普通外科手术市场:对普通外科医生及其专业技能的当前需求分析。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec;217(6):1133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.400.
2
General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: results of a survey of fellowship program directors.普通外科住院医师培训不足以使住院医师为专科培训做好准备:对专科培训计划主任的调查结果。
Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):440-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a191ca.
3
Early subspecialization and perceived competence in surgical training: are residents ready?
目标导向方法治疗急性胆囊炎的标准化:施行次全胆囊切除术的易于遵循的步骤。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Aug 15;409(1):251. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03438-1.
4
Comment on The Early (2009-2017) Experience With Robot-assisted Cholecystectomy in New York State.关于纽约州机器人辅助胆囊切除术的早期(2009 - 2017年)经验的评论
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Jan 13;3(1):e128. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000128. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Impact of AI system on recognition for anatomical landmarks related to reducing bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.人工智能系统对腹腔镜胆囊切除术中减少胆管损伤相关解剖标志识别的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5752-5759. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10224-5. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
6
The National Provider Identifier Taxonomy: Does it Align With a Surgeon's Actual Clinical Practice?国家提供者标识符分类法:它与外科医生的实际临床实践相符吗?
J Surg Res. 2023 Feb;282:254-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.09.008. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
7
Critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective investigation from both cognitive and executive aspects.腹腔镜胆囊切除术安全性的批判性观点:一项从认知和执行层面的前瞻性调查
Front Surg. 2022 Aug 1;9:946917. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.946917. eCollection 2022.
8
Artificial intelligence for phase recognition in complex laparoscopic cholecystectomy.人工智能在复杂腹腔镜胆囊切除术的相位识别中的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9215-9223. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09405-5. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
9
Validation of an artificial intelligence platform for the guidance of safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy.人工智能平台在指导安全腹腔镜胆囊切除术方面的验证。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2260-2268. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09439-9. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
10
2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy.2020 WSES 指南:胆囊切除术胆道损伤的检测与处理。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Jun 10;16(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00369-w.
早期亚专科化与外科培训中的感知能力:住院医师是否已准备好?
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Apr;216(4):764-71; discussion 771-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.045.
4
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: first, do no harm; second, take care of bile duct stones.腹腔镜胆囊切除术:第一,不造成伤害;第二,处理胆管结石。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1051-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2767-5. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
5
Acute care surgery: now that we have built it, will they come?急症外科:现在我们已经建立了它,他们会来吗?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Feb;74(2):463-8; discussion 468-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31827a0bcf.
6
Surgical management of acute cholecystitis: results of a 2-year prospective multicenter survey in Belgium.比利时一项为期两年的前瞻性多中心调查研究:急性胆囊炎的外科治疗结果。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Sep;26(9):2436-45. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2206-7. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
7
Our trainees' confidence: results from a national survey of 4136 US general surgery residents.我们学员的信心:来自对4136名美国普通外科住院医师的全国性调查结果。
Arch Surg. 2011 Aug;146(8):907-14. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.178.
8
FLS skill retention (learning) in first year surgery residents.第一年外科住院医师 FLS 技能保留(学习)。
J Surg Res. 2010 Sep;163(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.03.057. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
9
Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room-a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜手术模拟器训练到精通程度可以提高手术室腹腔镜操作技能:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Surg. 2010 Jan;199(1):115-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.07.035.
10
FLS assessment of competency using simulated laparoscopic tasks.使用模拟腹腔镜任务对能力进行FLS评估。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Feb;12(2):210-2. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0355-0. Epub 2007 Oct 23.