Department of Health Science, College of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
J Relig Health. 2012 Dec;51(4):1261-77. doi: 10.1007/s10943-010-9432-x.
The study of religious orientation thus far has neglected the influence of race/ethnicity as well as all four religious orientations (intrinsic, extrinsic, pro-religious and nonreligious) in explaining differences in both physical and psychological health. A representative sample of 250 Hispanics and 236 non-Hispanic Whites in Utah was drawn and analysed for differences in health (self-rated health, life satisfaction, exercise) according to race/ethnicity, religious orientation and religious attendance. Responses to the Religious Orientation Scale differed significantly by race/ethnicity, indicating that future studies of religious orientation should take cultural context into account. For both Whites and Hispanics, pro-religious individuals reported the highest life satisfaction scores, which highlight the utility of employing the fourfold religious orientation typology.
迄今为止,宗教取向的研究忽视了种族/民族以及四种宗教取向(内在、外在、亲宗教和非宗教)对解释身心健康差异的影响。在犹他州抽取了 250 名西班牙裔和 236 名非西班牙裔白人的代表性样本,并根据种族/民族、宗教取向和宗教参与情况分析了健康(自我评估健康、生活满意度、锻炼)的差异。对宗教取向量表的反应因种族/民族而异,这表明未来的宗教取向研究应该考虑文化背景。对于白人和西班牙裔人来说,亲宗教的人报告的生活满意度得分最高,这突出了采用四重宗教取向类型学的效用。