Department of Environmental & Occupational Physiology, Haute École Paul-Henri Spaak, Institut Supérieur d'Ergothérapie et de Kinésithérapie, Avenue Schaller 1160, Brussels, Belgium.
Acupunct Med. 2011 Mar;29(1):47-50. doi: 10.1136/aim.2010.002485. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
The aim of this study was to test whether acupuncture could modify the threshold of tolerance to thermal and electrical stimuli.
A randomised placebo-controlled single-blind trial was conducted in 36 healthy volunteers randomly distributed to control (no treatment), conventional acupuncture and sham acupuncture groups. The subjects were blind to the group allocation. The authors measured before and after treatment the pain threshold with the Painmatcher (Cefar Medical AB, Lund, Sweden) and the cold tolerance with the cold pressor test, together with the Visual Analogue Scale pain score.
Electrical stimulation threshold and cold pressor tolerance both increased significantly in the control and the true acupuncture groups, but not the sham group. The changes in the true acupuncture group were highly statistically significant and amounted to 24% (pain threshold) and 44% (cold tolerance) increases in threshold. The changes in the true group were significantly greater than the control group but not significantly different from the sham group. The changes in the sham and control groups were not significantly different from each other.
Acupuncture at true, appropriate points was more effective than no intervention in raising pain threshold and tolerance in volunteers, and acupuncture at inappropriate points had an intermediate effect which was not significantly different from either. Thus acupuncture analgesia may not be a point specific effect.
本研究旨在测试针刺是否可以改变对热和电刺激的耐受阈值。
在 36 名健康志愿者中进行了一项随机安慰剂对照单盲试验,将他们随机分为对照组(无治疗)、常规针刺组和假针刺组。受试者对分组情况不知情。作者使用 Painmatcher(Cefar Medical AB,Lund,瑞典)测量治疗前后的疼痛阈值,使用冷加压试验测量冷耐受力,并同时使用视觉模拟评分法测量疼痛评分。
电刺激阈值和冷加压耐受能力在对照组和真针刺组均显著增加,但假针刺组没有增加。真针刺组的变化具有高度统计学意义,疼痛阈值增加了 24%,冷耐受能力增加了 44%。真针刺组的变化明显大于对照组,但与假针刺组无显著差异。假针刺组和对照组之间的变化无显著差异。
在提高志愿者的疼痛阈值和耐受力方面,真正适当的穴位针刺比不干预更有效,而不适当的穴位针刺则具有中等效果,与两者均无显著差异。因此,针刺镇痛可能不是穴位特异性效应。