• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于胫骨感染性骨不连的伊里扎洛夫技术:经典环形贯穿钢丝装置与混合装置的比较

Ilizarov methodology for infected non union of the Tibia: Classic circular transfixion wire assembly vs. hybrid assembly.

作者信息

Baruah Ranjit Kr

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Assam Medical College, Dibrugarh - 786 002, Assam, India.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2007 Jul;41(3):198-203. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.33682.

DOI:10.4103/0019-5413.33682
PMID:21139744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2989118/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Conventional wire fixation of Ilizarov rings often fails to provide 90-90 configuration because of vital structures, which is essential for optimum stability. Hybrid assembly with half pins is an alternative. The aim of this study is to compare the results of Hybrid assembly with that of conventional classic circular transfixion wire Ilizarov assembly in 50 cases of infected nonunion of tibia between 1994 and 2003.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study includes two groups with 25 patients in each group: Group (A) conventional Ilizarov assembly and Group (B) hybrid Ilizarov assembly. Thirty-five cases developed infected nonunion following road traffic accidents while others after fall (6) bullet injury (4), infected osteosynthesis (3) and assault (2). There were 45 males and five females with mean age (18 to 56 years). All active cases (n=28) were treated by debridement including removal of implants in infected osteosynthesis. Twenty out of 22 cases in the quiescent group (non draining for last three consecutive months) were treated without open debridement; only two cases required open debridement for various reasons. All the cases were finally treated as atrophic aseptic nonunion with bone defect and were classified according to ASAMI. Type B1: length of the limb maintained with bone gap (14 cases in both Group A and B) and Type B3: combined shortening with defect (five and seven cases in Group A and B respectively), were treated by bifocal osteosynthesis. Only one case in the B3 group was treated by trifocal osteosynthesis to shorten the time. Type B2: segments in contact with limb shortening (total nine cases; five and four cases in Group A and B respectively) with shortening up to 2 cm (total five cases) were treated with monofocal osteosynthesis while shortening up to 5 cm and beyond (total four cases) were treated with bifocal osteosynthesis.

RESULTS

The cases were followed up for two to six years and the results were evaluated by Paley criteria of bony results (union, infection, deformity and leg-length discrepancy) and Functional Results (significant limp, equinus rigidity of the ankle, soft-tissue dystrophy, pain and inactivity). In both the groups, 24 cases out of 25, had excellent to good bony result with Group B having twice more excellent result than Group A. Functional results were found to be similar in both the groups. Although persistence of infection and Grade III pin tract infection (PTI) were slightly higher in Group B, complications like delayed consolidation of regenerate, refracture, deformity and aneurysm of vessel were less in this group.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Ilizarov methodology produced a satisfactory result in infected nonunion of the tibia. Hybrid assembly was a fruitful advancement in the Ilizarov armamentarium. The results were comparable to Conventional assembly in terms of docking site problems, corticotomy site problems, PTIs and other problems.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcc/2989118/e2ad3ff6689e/IJOrtho-41-198-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcc/2989118/30fd54193948/IJOrtho-41-198-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcc/2989118/0bf5c08c82e4/IJOrtho-41-198-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcc/2989118/f5a54e946441/IJOrtho-41-198-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcc/2989118/e2ad3ff6689e/IJOrtho-41-198-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcc/2989118/30fd54193948/IJOrtho-41-198-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcc/2989118/0bf5c08c82e4/IJOrtho-41-198-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcc/2989118/f5a54e946441/IJOrtho-41-198-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9dcc/2989118/e2ad3ff6689e/IJOrtho-41-198-g004.jpg
摘要

引言

由于重要结构的存在,传统的伊里扎洛夫环形外固定器钢丝固定常常无法实现90-90构型,而这种构型对于达到最佳稳定性至关重要。采用半针的混合式组装是一种替代方法。本研究的目的是比较1994年至2003年间50例胫骨感染性骨不连患者中混合式组装与传统经典环形贯穿钢丝伊里扎洛夫组装的结果。

材料与方法

本研究包括两组,每组25例患者:A组为传统伊里扎洛夫组装,B组为混合式伊里扎洛夫组装。35例患者因道路交通事故后发生感染性骨不连,其他患者分别因跌倒(6例)、枪伤(4例)、感染性骨固定术(3例)和袭击(2例)。共有45例男性和5例女性,平均年龄在18至56岁之间。所有活动期病例(n = 28)均接受清创治疗,包括去除感染性骨固定术中的植入物。静止期组(连续三个月无引流)的22例患者中,20例未进行开放性清创治疗;仅2例因各种原因需要进行开放性清创。所有病例最终均被视为伴有骨缺损的萎缩性无菌性骨不连,并根据ASAMI进行分类。B1型:肢体长度得以维持但存在骨间隙(A组和B组各14例),B3型:伴有缺损的合并短缩(A组5例,B组7例),采用双焦点骨合成术治疗。B3组中仅1例采用三焦点骨合成术以缩短治疗时间。B2型:肢体短缩但节段接触(共9例;A组5例,B组4例),短缩达2 cm(共5例)采用单焦点骨合成术治疗,短缩达5 cm及以上(共4例)采用双焦点骨合成术治疗。

结果

对病例进行了2至6年的随访,并根据佩利骨结果标准(骨愈合情况、感染情况、畸形情况和肢体长度差异)以及功能结果标准(明显跛行、踝关节马蹄足僵硬、软组织萎缩、疼痛和活动受限)对结果进行评估。两组中,25例患者中有24例获得了优良的骨结果,B组的优良结果数量是A组的两倍。发现两组的功能结果相似。虽然B组感染持续存在和III级针道感染(PTI)的发生率略高,但该组再生延迟愈合、再骨折、畸形和血管动脉瘤等并发症较少。

讨论与结论

伊里扎洛夫方法在胫骨感染性骨不连的治疗中取得了令人满意的结果。混合式组装是伊里扎洛夫器械库中的一项富有成效的进展。在对接部位问题、截骨部位问题、PTI及其他问题方面,其结果与传统组装相当。

相似文献

1
Ilizarov methodology for infected non union of the Tibia: Classic circular transfixion wire assembly vs. hybrid assembly.用于胫骨感染性骨不连的伊里扎洛夫技术:经典环形贯穿钢丝装置与混合装置的比较
Indian J Orthop. 2007 Jul;41(3):198-203. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.33682.
2
Management of nonunion of lower-extremity long bones using mono-lateral external fixator--report of 37 cases.单侧外固定架治疗下肢长骨骨不连——附37例报告
Injury. 2014 Mar;45(3):560-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Nov 27.
3
The treatment of infected nonunion of the tibia following intramedullary nailing by the Ilizarov method.Ilizarov 法髓内钉治疗感染性胫骨骨不连。
Injury. 2010 Mar;41(3):294-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.09.013.
4
Infected tibial nonunion in children: Is radical debridement mandatory?儿童感染性胫骨骨不连:是否必须进行彻底清创?
Injury. 2019 Feb;50(2):590-597. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.10.043. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
5
Treatment of complex nonunion of the shaft of the tibia using Ilizarov technique and its functional outcome.采用伊里扎洛夫技术治疗胫骨骨干复杂骨不连及其功能结果。
Niger Med J. 2016 Mar-Apr;57(2):129-33. doi: 10.4103/0300-1652.182076.
6
Acute Shortening and Re-Lengthening (ASRL) in Infected Non-union of Tibia - Advantages Revisited.胫骨感染性骨不连的急性缩短与再延长(ASRL)——优势再探讨
Malays Orthop J. 2020 Jul;14(2):47-56. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.2007.012.
7
Bifocal compression-distraction in the acute treatment of grade III open tibia fractures with bone and soft-tissue loss: a report of 24 cases.双焦点加压-撑开技术在急性治疗伴有骨与软组织缺损的Ⅲ度开放性胫骨骨折中的应用:24例报告
J Orthop Trauma. 2004 Mar;18(3):150-7. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200403000-00005.
8
Paediatric infected femoral nonunion; mid-term results of a rare problem with a single-stage treatment and up to eleven and half years follow-up.小儿感染性股骨干骨不连;一期治疗罕见问题的中期结果和长达十一年半的随访。
Int Orthop. 2020 Mar;44(3):503-509. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04464-1. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
9
Ilizarov bone transport combined with antibiotic cement spacer for infected tibial nonunion.伊利扎洛夫骨搬运联合抗生素骨水泥间隔物治疗感染性胫骨骨不连
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Jun 15;8(6):10058-65. eCollection 2015.
10
Limb salvage and functional recovery in infected nonunion of the distal tibia treated with the Ilizarov techniques.应用伊利扎洛夫技术治疗胫骨远端感染性骨不连的保肢及功能恢复情况
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2023 Sep 22;44:102255. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102255. eCollection 2023 Sep.

引用本文的文献

1
Distraction osteogenesis versus induced membrane technique for infected tibial non-unions with segmental bone loss: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of available studies.牵张成骨术与诱导膜技术治疗感染性胫骨骨不连伴节段性骨缺损:文献系统评价和现有研究的荟萃分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun;50(3):705-721. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02375-w. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
2
Outcome analysis of ilizarov and monorail fixators in the treatment of nonunion of long bones: A systematic review and proportion meta-analysis.伊里扎洛夫与单轨固定器治疗长骨骨不连的疗效分析:一项系统评价与比例Meta分析
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2023 May 18;40:102170. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102170. eCollection 2023 May.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Infected nonunion of the tibia.胫骨感染性骨不连
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Dec(369):302-11. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199912000-00032.
2
Limb-lengthening, skeletal reconstruction, and bone transport with the Ilizarov method.采用伊里扎洛夫方法进行肢体延长、骨骼重建和骨搬运。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Aug;79(8):1243-58. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199708000-00019.
3
Chronic infected tibial nonunions with bone loss. Conventional techniques versus bone transport.伴有骨缺损的慢性感染性胫骨骨不连。传统技术与骨搬运术的比较
Assessment of Lower Limb Load Distribution in Patients Treated with the Ilizarov Method for Tibial Nonunion.
评估 Ilizarov 法治疗胫骨骨不连患者的下肢负荷分布。
Med Sci Monit. 2021 May 28;27:e930849. doi: 10.12659/MSM.930849.
4
Assessment of Gait after Treatment of Tibial Nonunion with the Ilizarov Method.伊利扎罗夫方法治疗胫骨骨不连后步态的评估
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 16;18(8):4217. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084217.
5
The outcomes of Ilizarov treatment in aseptic nonunions of the tibia stratified by treatment strategies and surgical techniques.依拉扎洛夫治疗策略和手术技术分层的胫骨无菌性骨不连的治疗结果。
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 25;10(1):20511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77569-y.
6
Comparison of Clinico-radiological Outcomes of Monolateral Fixator in Infected Non-union of Tibia Based on Bone Gap Quantification.基于骨缺损量化比较单侧外固定架治疗胫骨感染性骨不连的临床影像学结果
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Mar 2;54(4):495-503. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00053-2. eCollection 2020 Jul.
7
Treatment of Infected Tibial Non-Unions with Ilizarov Technique: A Case Series.采用伊里扎洛夫技术治疗感染性胫骨骨不连:病例系列
J Clin Med. 2020 May 5;9(5):1352. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051352.
8
Infected nonunion of tibia.胫骨感染性骨不连
Indian J Orthop. 2017 May-Jun;51(3):256-268. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_199_16.
9
Outcome of distraction osteogenesis by ring fixator in infected, large bone defects of tibia.环形固定器治疗感染性胫骨大段骨缺损的牵张成骨结果
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2016 Oct-Dec;7(Suppl 2):201-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2016.02.016. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
10
Efficacy of a compliant semicircular Ilizarov pin fixator module for treating infected nonunion of the femoral diaphysis.一种顺应性半圆形伊里扎洛夫针固定器模块治疗股骨干感染性骨不连的疗效
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2014 Aug;9(2):101-9. doi: 10.1007/s11751-014-0199-6. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Apr(301):139-46.
4
Segmental tibial defects. Comparing conventional and Ilizarov methodologies.胫骨节段性缺损。传统方法与伊里扎洛夫方法的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Apr(301):118-23.
5
Skeletal defects. A comparison of bone grafting and bone transport for segmental skeletal defects.骨骼缺损。骨移植与骨搬运治疗节段性骨骼缺损的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Apr(301):111-7.
6
The infected nonunion of the tibia.胫骨感染性骨不连
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Jun(315):176-91.
7
[Treatment of septic or non-septic diaphyseal pseudoarthroses by Ilizarov's monofocal compression method].[采用伊利扎洛夫单焦点加压法治疗感染性或非感染性骨干假关节]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1985;71(4):223-9.
8
[The Ilizarov method in the treatment of severe axial deviations of the limbs].[伊里扎洛夫方法治疗肢体严重轴向畸形]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1988;74 Suppl 2:237-40.
9
Ilizarov treatment of tibial nonunions with bone loss.伊利扎洛夫技术治疗伴有骨缺损的胫骨骨不连
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Apr(241):146-65.
10
Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique.伊里扎洛夫技术肢体延长的问题、障碍及并发症
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Jan(250):81-104.