King’s College London,Centre for the Economics of Mental Health, Instituteof Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, London, UK.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Feb;29(2):157-70. doi: 10.2165/11537360-000000000-00000.
Research has consistently demonstrated a relationship between depression and increased levels of health service use over the short term. However, much less is known about how this relationship is influenced by the success, or otherwise, of depression management strategies, and the economic impact over the longer term.
To investigate the economic impact of non-remission on health service use and costs over 12 months from the index episode in patients with depression.
A naturalistic, longitudinal study was carried out using data from a large primary care UK general practice research database between 2001 and 2006. The records of 88 935 patients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with depression and in receipt of at least two antidepressant prescriptions (for amitriptyline, citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline or venlafaxine) in the first 3 months after the index prescription were included. The main outcome measures were health service use and cost over the 12-month study period, by remission status, where remission is defined as patients not using antidepressants for at least 6 months after antidepressant treatment has ended.
Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were similar for participants classified as in remission and those not in remission. Over 12 months from the index prescription, patients classified as non-remitters spent longer, on average, than patients classified as remitters on concomitant psychotropic medication (204 days vs 93 days, respectively), and had more contact with primary care services (17 vs 13 GP visits), secondary care psychiatrists and other specialists (47% vs 40%). Days in hospital, accident and emergency attendances and psychological therapy contacts did not differ between the groups. Total 12-month costs per participant were significantly lower for remitters (mean £656 vs £937; mean difference £317; p < 0.0001). Total costs fell over time for both groups, but at a faster rate for those in remission, and for those who remitted earlier after the index prescription than for those who remitted later.
Successful cessation of antidepressant medication treatment in adults with depression can result in significant cost savings to the health service.
研究一致表明,在短期内心境障碍与卫生服务利用度的增加之间存在关联。然而,对于心境障碍管理策略的成功与否如何影响这种关联,以及从长期来看这种关联对经济的影响,人们知之甚少。
调查抑郁患者在指数发病后 12 个月内非缓解状态对卫生服务使用和成本的经济影响。
这是一项使用 2001 年至 2006 年英国大型初级保健普通实践研究数据库中的数据开展的自然、纵向研究。该研究纳入了 88935 名年龄≥18 岁的患者,这些患者在指数处方后前 3 个月内接受了至少两种抗抑郁药物(阿米替林、西酞普兰、艾司西酞普兰、氟西汀、帕罗西汀、舍曲林或文拉法辛)处方,且诊断为抑郁。主要观察指标为缓解状态下的 12 个月研究期间的卫生服务使用和成本,其中缓解定义为抗抑郁药物治疗结束后至少 6 个月未使用抗抑郁药物。
按缓解情况分类的参与者在人口统计学和临床特征方面相似。与缓解者相比,非缓解者从指数处方开始的 12 个月内,平均使用伴随精神药物的时间更长(分别为 204 天和 93 天),且与初级保健服务(分别为 17 次和 13 次就诊)、二级保健精神科医生和其他专科医生(分别为 47%和 40%)的接触次数更多。两组患者的住院天数、急诊就诊次数和心理治疗接触次数无差异。每个参与者的 12 个月总费用显著低于缓解者(分别为 656 英镑和 937 英镑;平均差异 317 英镑;p<0.0001)。两组的总费用随时间推移均下降,但缓解者下降速度更快,且从指数处方开始更早缓解的患者比较晚缓解的患者下降速度更快。
在患有抑郁的成年人中成功停止抗抑郁药物治疗可使卫生服务节省大量成本。