Terés J, Planas R, Panes J, Salmeron J M, Mas A, Bosch J, Llorente C, Viver J, Feu F, Rodés J
Liver Unit, Hospital Clinic i Provincial Medical School, Barcelona, Spain.
Hepatology. 1990 Jun;11(6):964-8. doi: 10.1002/hep.1840110609.
Vasopressin infusion and esophageal tamponade are still widely used to arrest variceal bleeding, but no objective evidence exists on the superiority of either of the two procedures. In this study, 108 cirrhotic patients bleeding from varices were included in a prospective, randomized trial to investigate the comparative effectiveness and safety of balloon tamponade (using the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube for esophageal varices and the Linton-Nachlas tube for gastric varices) (n = 52) and intravenous vasopressin infusion (0.4 to 0.8 mu/min) plus intravenous nitroglycerin infusion (40 to 400 micrograms/min) (n = 56). Both treatments were maintained for 24-hr. The hemostatic efficacy according to the intention to treat was 86.5% for tamponade and 66% for pharmacological therapy (p less than 0.01). No significant differences were found with respect to rebleeding during the first 72 hr after treatment, mortality rate or side effects. These results suggest that esophageal tamponade is more effective than vasopressin/nitroglycerin infusion in the treatment of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients.
血管加压素输注和食管压迫止血仍广泛用于控制静脉曲张出血,但尚无客观证据表明这两种方法中任何一种具有优越性。在本研究中,108例静脉曲张出血的肝硬化患者被纳入一项前瞻性随机试验,以研究气囊压迫止血(使用用于食管静脉曲张的Sengstaken-Blakemore管和用于胃静脉曲张的Linton-Nachlas管)(n = 52)与静脉输注血管加压素(0.4至0.8 μ/min)加静脉输注硝酸甘油(40至400 μg/min)(n = 56)的相对有效性和安全性。两种治疗均维持24小时。根据意向性分析,压迫止血的止血有效率为86.5%,药物治疗为66%(p<0.01)。在治疗后的前72小时内,再出血、死亡率或副作用方面未发现显著差异。这些结果表明,在治疗肝硬化患者的静脉曲张出血方面,食管压迫止血比血管加压素/硝酸甘油输注更有效。