• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用标准量表评估颞叶癫痫患者的社会心理适应情况。

Assessment of psychosocial adjustment in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy using a standard measure.

机构信息

Psychology and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, Medical School (IPq-HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Jan;20(1):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.10.033. Epub 2010 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.10.033
PMID:21145288
Abstract

Despite the growing evidence of poor psychosocial adjustment, at present there is no formal method of assessment of social adjustment in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). First, we assessed social adjustment in patients with TLE using a self-report questionnaire and compared the results with those from quality-of-life (QOL) scales. Second, we verified the influence of cognitive performance and clinical variables of epilepsy on social adjustment and QOL. We evaluated 35 people with TLE and 38 healthy controls. Patients had worse social adjustment, and it was correlated with worse perception of cognitive function. Attention and verbal memory dysfunctions were negatively correlated with social adjustment. However, there was no significant correlation between cognitive performance and QOL. Regarding clinical variables, persons with left TLE showed worse social adjustment and patients with frequent seizures showed worse QOL. These findings indicate the relevance of evaluating social adjustment and emphasize the importance of cognitive rehabilitation to improved social adjustment.

摘要

尽管越来越多的证据表明颞叶癫痫(TLE)患者的心理社会适应不良,但目前尚无评估 TLE 患者社会适应的正式方法。首先,我们使用自我报告问卷评估了 TLE 患者的社会适应能力,并将结果与生活质量(QOL)量表的结果进行了比较。其次,我们验证了认知表现和癫痫临床变量对社会适应和 QOL 的影响。我们评估了 35 名 TLE 患者和 38 名健康对照者。患者的社会适应能力较差,与认知功能的感知较差相关。注意力和言语记忆功能障碍与社会适应不良呈负相关。然而,认知表现与 QOL 之间没有显著相关性。关于临床变量,左侧 TLE 的患者社会适应能力较差,癫痫发作频繁的患者 QOL 较差。这些发现表明评估社会适应的相关性以及认知康复对改善社会适应的重要性。

相似文献

1
Assessment of psychosocial adjustment in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy using a standard measure.使用标准量表评估颞叶癫痫患者的社会心理适应情况。
Epilepsy Behav. 2011 Jan;20(1):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.10.033. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
2
Normalization of quality of life three years after temporal lobectomy: a controlled study.颞叶切除术后三年生活质量的正常化:一项对照研究。
Epilepsia. 2006 May;47(5):928-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00523.x.
3
Self-reported quality of life in pharmacoresistant temporal lobe epilepsy: correlation with clinical variables and memory evaluation.药物难治性颞叶癫痫患者的自我报告生活质量:与临床变量和记忆评估的相关性。
Epileptic Disord. 2013 Sep;15(3):263-71. doi: 10.1684/epd.2013.0590.
4
Impulsivity and seizure frequency, but not cognitive deficits, impact social adjustment in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.冲动性和癫痫发作频率,而不是认知缺陷,影响青少年肌阵挛性癫痫患者的社会适应能力。
Epilepsia. 2013 May;54(5):866-70. doi: 10.1111/epi.12116.
5
Chronic temporal lobe epilepsy: a neurodevelopmental or progressively dementing disease?慢性颞叶癫痫:神经发育性疾病还是进行性痴呆性疾病?
Brain. 2009 Oct;132(Pt 10):2822-30. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp182. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
6
Psychological outcome profiles in childhood-onset temporal lobe epilepsy.儿童期起病颞叶癫痫的心理结局特征。
Epilepsia. 2010 Oct;51(10):2066-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02664.x.
7
Impaired facial expression recognition in children with temporal lobe epilepsy: impact of early seizure onset on fear recognition.颞叶癫痫患儿面部表情识别受损:早期癫痫发作对恐惧识别的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Apr;46(5):1415-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.019. Epub 2007 Dec 28.
8
Determining empirically based self-reported cognitive change: development of reliable change indices and standardized regression-based change norms for the multiple abilities self-report questionnaire in an epilepsy sample.基于实证确定自我报告的认知变化:为癫痫样本中的多能力自陈问卷制定可靠变化指数和基于标准化回归的变化规范。
Epilepsy Behav. 2006 Feb;8(1):239-45. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.10.004. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
9
Does naming contribute to memory self-report in temporal lobe epilepsy?命名是否有助于颞叶癫痫的记忆自我报告?
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1996 Feb;18(1):98-109. doi: 10.1080/01688639608408266.
10
A comparison of emotional and cognitive intelligence in people with and without temporal lobe epilepsy.有颞叶癫痫和无颞叶癫痫人群的情绪智力与认知智力比较。
Epilepsia. 2008 Aug;49(8):1470-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01655.x. Epub 2008 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Alterations of Activity in Visual Areas of Left Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Patients: Evidence from Moving Facial Emotional Tasks.左颞叶内侧癫痫患者视觉区域活动的改变:来自动态面部情绪任务的证据。
Ann Neurosci. 2025 Mar 27:09727531251315608. doi: 10.1177/09727531251315608.
2
Psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents with temporal lobe epilepsy: A narrative review.颞叶癫痫患儿及青少年的精神障碍:一项叙述性综述。
Epilepsia Open. 2025 Feb;10(1):74-84. doi: 10.1002/epi4.13122. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
3
Determinants of health-related quality of life of patients with focal epilepsy: A systematic literature review.
局灶性癫痫患者健康相关生活质量的决定因素:一项系统文献综述。
Epileptic Disord. 2025 Feb;27(1):9-30. doi: 10.1002/epd2.20292. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
4
Dynamic facial emotion recognition and affective prosody recognition are associated in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.动态面部情绪识别和情感韵律识别与颞叶癫痫患者相关。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 16;14(1):3935. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53401-9.
5
Validation of the integrative model of adjustment to chronic conditions: Applicability to adult-onset epilepsy.慢性病适应综合模型的验证:对成人发作性癫痫的适用性。
Health Psychol Open. 2019 Nov 7;6(2):2055102919884293. doi: 10.1177/2055102919884293. eCollection 2019 Jul-Dec.
6
Recall and Self-Relevance of Emotional Words Predict Subjective Self-Evaluation of Cognition in Patients with MTLE with or without Depressive Symptoms.伴有或不伴有抑郁症状的内侧颞叶癫痫患者中,情绪词汇的回忆和自我相关性可预测认知的主观自我评估。
Brain Sci. 2021 Oct 24;11(11):1402. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11111402.
7
Memory Rehabilitation in Patients with Epilepsy: a Systematic Review.癫痫患者的记忆康复:系统评价。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2018 Mar;28(1):88-110. doi: 10.1007/s11065-018-9367-7. Epub 2018 Feb 15.