Roe David, Werbeloff Nomi, Gelkopf Marc
Department of Community Mental Health, University of Haifa, Israel.
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2010;47(3):166-70.
Since the implementation of the legislation of the Rehabilitation of the Mentally Disabled in the Community Law a decade ago, an increasing number of people have been receiving the psychiatric rehabilitation 'basket of service', yet the impact of these services has barely been studied. The purpose of the present study is to examine whether people with severe mental illness in Israel who consume psychiatric rehabilitation services report better outcomes than people with severe mental illness who are eligible and have applied for psychiatric rehabilitation services but have not yet utilized them.
1,191 persons with severe mental illness (595 psychiatric rehabilitation service users and 596 nonusers) completed face-to-face interviews. Differences in quality of life, general satisfaction and psychiatric symptoms between psychiatric rehabilitation service users and non-users were examined using Analysis of Covariance controlling for the potential confounding effects of age and marital status.
Adjusted comparisons of quality of life, general satisfaction and psychiatric symptoms revealed that psychiatric rehabilitation service users had better outcomes than non-users: they reported better quality of life and greater satisfaction alongside fewer psychiatric symptoms. The most striking difference between the groups was found in the domain of employment and income, with non-psychiatric rehabilitation service users scoring 0.9 effect sizes below psychiatric rehabilitation service users.
The current study, based on a relatively large sample, provides support for the effectiveness of the psychiatric rehabilitation 'basket of services'. Future studies including clinicians ratings of more objective aspects of functioning may provide a broader picture of the association between psychiatric rehabilitation service utilization and outcome.
自十年前实施《社区精神残疾者康复法》立法以来,越来越多的人开始接受精神康复“服务套餐”,然而这些服务的影响几乎未得到研究。本研究的目的是检验在以色列,接受精神康复服务的重度精神疾病患者与符合条件并已申请精神康复服务但尚未使用的重度精神疾病患者相比,是否报告了更好的结果。
1191名重度精神疾病患者(595名精神康复服务使用者和596名非使用者)完成了面对面访谈。使用协方差分析控制年龄和婚姻状况的潜在混杂效应,检验精神康复服务使用者和非使用者在生活质量、总体满意度和精神症状方面的差异。
对生活质量、总体满意度和精神症状的调整后比较显示,精神康复服务使用者的结果优于非使用者:他们报告的生活质量更好,满意度更高,同时精神症状更少。两组之间最显著的差异出现在就业和收入领域,非精神康复服务使用者的效应量比精神康复服务使用者低0.9。
本研究基于相对较大的样本,为精神康复“服务套餐”的有效性提供了支持。未来的研究,包括临床医生对功能更客观方面的评分,可能会更全面地呈现精神康复服务利用与结果之间的关联。