• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

康复照料环境中患有严重精神疾病者再次住院的风险。

Risks for re-hospitalization of persons with severe mental illness living in rehabilitation care settings.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khushi Ave, Mt Carmel, Haifa, Israel.

Department of Community Mental Health, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khushi Ave, Mt Carmel, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Isr J Health Policy Res. 2024 Apr 3;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13584-024-00605-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13584-024-00605-z
PMID:38570853
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10993576/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The high rates of psychiatric re-hospitalizations (also termed "revolving door") presents a "wicked problem" which requires a systematic and holistic approach to its resolution. Israel's mental-health rehabilitation law provides a comprehensive set of services intended to support the ability of persons with severe mental illness to rely on community rather than in-patient facilities for their ongoing care needs. Guided by the Health Behavior Model, we examined the relationship between psychiatric re-hospitalizations and the three Health Behavior Model factors (predisposing factor: socio-demographic characteristics and health beliefs; enabling factor: personal and social/vocational relationships facilitated by rehabilitation interventions and services; and need factor: outcomes including symptoms, and mental health and functional status) among persons with severe mental illness receiving rehabilitation services.

METHODS

Logistic regression models were used to measure the association between re-hospitalization within a year and variables comprising the three Health Behavior Model factors on the sample of consumers utilizing psychiatric services (n = 7,165). The area under the curve for the model was calculated for each factor separately and for all three factors combined.

RESULTS

A total of 846 (11.8%) consumers were hospitalized within a year after the study began. Although multivariable analyses showed significant associations between re-hospitalization and all three Health Behavior Model factors, the magnitude of the model's area under the curve differed: 0.61 (CI = 0.59-0.64), 0.56 (CI = 0.54-0.58), 0.78 (CI = 0.77-0.80) and 0.78 (CI = 0.76-0.80) for predisposing, enabling, need and the full three-factor Health Behavior Model, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Findings revealed that among the three Health Behavior Model factors, the need factor best predicted re-hospitalization. The enabling factor, comprised of personal relationships and social/vocational activities facilitated by interventions and services representing many of psychiatric rehabilitation's key goals, had the weakest association with reduced rates of re-hospitalization. Possible explanations may be inaccurate assessments of consumers' personal relationships and social/vocational activities by the mental healthcare professionals, problematic provider-consumer communication on the consumers' involvement in social/vocational activities, or ineffective methods of facilitating consumer participation in these activities. Clearly to reduce the wicked "revolving-door" phenomenon, there is a need for targeted interventions and a review of current psychiatric rehabilitation policies to promote the comprehensive integration of community rehabilitation services by decreasing the fragmentation of care, facilitating continuity of care with other healthcare services, and utilizing effective personal reported outcomes and experiences of consumers with severe mental illness.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc6/10993576/c50439bb81db/13584_2024_605_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc6/10993576/c50439bb81db/13584_2024_605_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcc6/10993576/c50439bb81db/13584_2024_605_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

精神科再住院率(也称为“ revolving door ”)很高,这是一个“棘手问题”,需要采取系统和整体的方法来解决。以色列的精神卫生康复法提供了一整套服务,旨在支持严重精神疾病患者依靠社区而不是住院设施来满足其持续的护理需求。本研究以健康行为模式为指导,研究了严重精神疾病患者的再住院率与健康行为模式的三个因素(易感性因素:社会人口特征和健康信念;促成因素:康复干预和服务促进的个人和社会/职业关系;需要因素:包括症状、心理健康和功能状态在内的结果)之间的关系。

方法

使用逻辑回归模型来衡量在一年内在利用精神科服务的消费者样本中再住院与健康行为模式三个因素组成变量之间的关联(n=7165)。为每个因素和所有三个因素的组合分别计算模型的曲线下面积。

结果

共有 846 名(11.8%)消费者在研究开始后一年内住院。尽管多变量分析显示再住院与健康行为模式的三个因素均存在显著关联,但模型曲线下面积的大小有所不同:易感性因素为 0.61(CI=0.59-0.64)、促成因素为 0.56(CI=0.54-0.58)、需要因素为 0.78(CI=0.77-0.80),以及完整的健康行为模式三因素为 0.78(CI=0.76-0.80)。

结论

研究结果表明,在健康行为模式的三个因素中,需求因素是再住院的最佳预测因素。促成因素由干预措施和服务所促进的个人关系和社会/职业活动组成,这些活动代表了精神康复的许多关键目标,与降低再住院率的关联最弱。可能的解释是精神卫生保健专业人员对消费者个人关系和社会/职业活动的评估不准确、提供者与消费者之间在消费者参与社会/职业活动方面的沟通存在问题,或者促进消费者参与这些活动的方法无效。显然,为了减少这种“棘手的”“ revolving door ”现象,需要有针对性的干预措施和对当前精神康复政策的审查,通过减少护理的碎片化、促进与其他医疗保健服务的护理连续性以及利用严重精神疾病患者的个人报告结果和经验,来促进社区康复服务的全面整合。

相似文献

1
Risks for re-hospitalization of persons with severe mental illness living in rehabilitation care settings.康复照料环境中患有严重精神疾病者再次住院的风险。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2024 Apr 3;13(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13584-024-00605-z.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
4
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
5
Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services.法定心理健康服务成年客户的护理消费者提供者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD004807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2.
6
Intensive case management for severe mental illness.严重精神疾病的强化个案管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6(10):CD007906. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007906.pub2.
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta-analysis.针对重度精神疾病成年人获得和维持就业的干预措施:一项网状荟萃分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD011867. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011867.pub2.
10
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender differences in quality of life and the course of schizophrenia: national study.精神分裂症患者生活质量及病程中的性别差异:全国性研究。
BJPsych Open. 2022 Feb 1;8(2):e35. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.3.
2
Quality of life, symptom severity and level of functioning in people with severe mental illness ready for hospital discharge.准备出院的重度精神疾病患者的生活质量、症状严重程度及功能水平
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Feb;29(1):14-24. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12703. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
3
Supporting political rights for people in psychiatric rehabilitation: "Appropriate" political action in medicalized environments.
支持精神疾病康复者的政治权利:在医疗化环境中的“适当”政治行动。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Jun;28(3):494-502. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12678. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
4
Factors Associated with Rapid Readmission Among Nevada State Psychiatric Hospital Patients.内华达州州立精神病医院患者快速再入院相关因素。
Community Ment Health J. 2019 Jul;55(5):804-810. doi: 10.1007/s10597-018-0316-y. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
5
Overview of post-discharge predictors for psychiatric re-hospitalisations: a systematic review of the literature.出院后精神科再住院预测因素概述:文献系统综述
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 24;17(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1386-z.
6
Routine patient reported outcomes as predictors of psychiatric rehospitalization.常规患者报告结局作为精神科再住院的预测指标。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Feb;192:119-123. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.04.049. Epub 2017 May 9.
7
Factors associated with help-seeking behaviour among individuals with major depression: A systematic review.重度抑郁症患者寻求帮助行为的相关因素:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0176730. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176730. eCollection 2017.
8
Pre-discharge factors predicting readmissions of psychiatric patients: a systematic review of the literature.预测精神科患者再入院的出院前因素:文献系统综述
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 16;16(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1114-0.
9
The professional psychiatric/mental health nurse: skills, competencies and supports required to adopt recovery-orientated policy in practice.专业精神科/心理健康护士:在实践中采用以康复为导向政策所需的技能、能力和支持。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Mar;24(2-3):93-104. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12347. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
10
The association between continuity of care and readmission to hospital in patients with severe psychosis.重度精神病患者的连续护理与再次入院之间的关联。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;51(12):1633-1643. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1287-3. Epub 2016 Oct 25.