• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于医院的开放式门诊手术中心与独立门诊手术中心在白内障超声乳化术中CDE数据的比较。

Comparison of CDE data in phacoemulsification between an open hospital-based ambulatory surgical center and a free-standing ambulatory surgical center.

作者信息

Chen Ming, Chen Mindy

机构信息

University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov 12;4:1287-9. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S15076.

DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S15076
PMID:21151334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2993129/
Abstract

Mean CDE (cumulative dissipated energy) values were compared for an open hospital- based surgical center and a free-standing surgical center. The same model of phacoemulsifier (Alcon Infiniti Ozil) was used. Mean CDE values showed that surgeons (individual private practice) at the free-standing surgical center were more efficient than surgeons (individual private practice) at the open hospital-based surgical center (mean CDE at the hospital-based surgical center 18.96 seconds [SD = 12.51]; mean CDE at the free-standing surgical center 13.2 seconds [SD = 9.5]). CDE can be used to monitor the efficiency of a cataract surgeon and surgical center in phacoemulsification. The CDE value may be used by institutions as one of the indicators for quality control and audit in phacoemulsification.

摘要

对一家开放式医院手术中心和一家独立手术中心的平均累积耗散能量(CDE)值进行了比较。使用了相同型号的超声乳化仪(爱尔康Infiniti Ozil)。平均CDE值表明,独立手术中心的外科医生(个体私人执业)比开放式医院手术中心的外科医生(个体私人执业)效率更高(医院手术中心的平均CDE为18.96秒[标准差=12.51];独立手术中心的平均CDE为13.2秒[标准差=9.5])。CDE可用于监测白内障外科医生和手术中心在超声乳化手术中的效率。机构可将CDE值用作超声乳化手术质量控制和审计的指标之一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b06f/2993129/63356b11ef23/opth-4-1287f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b06f/2993129/63356b11ef23/opth-4-1287f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b06f/2993129/63356b11ef23/opth-4-1287f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of CDE data in phacoemulsification between an open hospital-based ambulatory surgical center and a free-standing ambulatory surgical center.基于医院的开放式门诊手术中心与独立门诊手术中心在白内障超声乳化术中CDE数据的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov 12;4:1287-9. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S15076.
2
A retrospective randomized study to compare the energy delivered using CDE with different techniques and OZil settings by different surgeons in phacoemulsification.一项回顾性随机研究,旨在比较不同外科医生在白内障超声乳化手术中使用不同技术和Ozil设置的CDE所传递的能量。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:401-3. doi: 10.2147/opth.s6135. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
3
Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems.英飞尼迪和百夫长超声乳化系统之间累积耗散能量的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul 22;9:1367-72. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S88225. eCollection 2015.
4
Differences in energy expenditure for conventional and femtosecond-assisted cataract surgery using 2 different phacoemulsification systems.使用两种不同超声乳化系统的传统白内障手术和飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的能量消耗差异。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Jan;43(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.11.037.
5
Changes in pupillometry associated with dissipated energy during phacoemulsification.超声乳化手术中能量耗散相关的瞳孔变化。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov;31(6):2962-2968. doi: 10.1177/1120672120984377. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
6
Comparison of cumulative dispersed energy (CDE) in femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) and conventional phacoemulsification.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)与传统超声乳化白内障吸除术中累积离散能量(CDE)的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug;39(8):1761-1766. doi: 10.1007/s10792-018-0996-x. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
7
Clinical study using a new phacoemulsification system with surgical intraocular pressure control.临床研究使用新的超声乳化系统和手术眼内压控制。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Apr;42(4):542-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.01.037.
8
Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy delivered by active-fluidic pressure control phacoemulsification system versus gravity-fluidics.有源流体压力控制超声乳化系统与重力流体输送的累积耗散能量比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct;38(5):1907-1913. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0674-4. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
9
[Computer-assisted phacoemulsification for hard cataracts].[计算机辅助超声乳化治疗硬核白内障]
Oftalmologia. 2012;56(4):81-4.
10
Feasibility of the New Torsional Phacoemulsification Software Phacoemulsification (Ozil IP) in Hard Cataracts.新型扭转式超声乳化软件(Ozil IP)用于硬核白内障超声乳化的可行性
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2013 Nov-Dec;2(6):372-4. doi: 10.1097/APO.0b013e31828a56f7.

引用本文的文献

1
Visual outcomes after cataract surgery in monocular compared to binocular patients: a case-control study.单眼与双眼白内障手术后的视力结果比较:病例对照研究。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 27;44(1):162. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-02998-x.
2
Safety and efficacy of cataract surgery performed with a low-energy femtosecond laser compared with conventional phacoemulsification in Chinese patients: a randomized clinical trial.在中国患者中,低能量飞秒激光白内障手术与传统超声乳化白内障手术相比的安全性和有效性:一项随机临床试验。
Eye Vis (Lond). 2023 Jul 2;10(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40662-023-00347-0.
3
Conventional Phacoemulsification Surgery Versus Femtosecond Laser Phacoemulsification Surgery: A Comparative Analysis of Cumulative Dissipated Energy and Corneal Endothelial Loss in Cataract Patients.

本文引用的文献

1
A retrospective randomized study to compare the energy delivered using CDE with different techniques and OZil settings by different surgeons in phacoemulsification.一项回顾性随机研究,旨在比较不同外科医生在白内障超声乳化手术中使用不同技术和Ozil设置的CDE所传递的能量。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:401-3. doi: 10.2147/opth.s6135. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
2
Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: randomized comparative clinical study.扭转模式与传统超声模式白内障超声乳化术:随机对照临床研究。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Feb;33(2):287-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.044.
3
Effects of phacoemulsification time on the corneal endothelium using phacofracture and phaco chop techniques.
传统超声乳化手术与飞秒激光超声乳化手术:白内障患者累积消散能量与角膜内皮损失的比较分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Jun 19;17:1709-1716. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S408717. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.单手旋转超声乳化术与传统超声乳化术及飞秒激光辅助白内障手术的围手术期参数比较
Int J Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec 18;14(12):1868-1875. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2021.12.09. eCollection 2021.
5
Differences in energy and corneal endothelium between femtosecond laser-assisted and conventional cataract surgeries: prospective, intraindividual, randomized controlled trial.飞秒激光辅助白内障手术与传统白内障手术在能量和角膜内皮方面的差异:前瞻性、个体内、随机对照试验。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug 18;11(8):1308-1316. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.08.10. eCollection 2018.
6
Preexisting epiretinal membrane is associated with pseudophakic cystoid macular edema.既往存在的视网膜前膜与人工晶状体眼黄斑囊样水肿相关。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 May;256(5):909-917. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-3954-4. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
7
Combined 30-degree bevel up and down technique against 0-degree phaco tip for phacoemulsification surgery of hard cataracts.用于硬核白内障超声乳化手术的联合30度上下倾斜技术与0度超声乳化针头对比
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 6;11:1073-1079. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S131921. eCollection 2017.
8
Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems.英飞尼迪和百夫长超声乳化系统之间累积耗散能量的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Jul 22;9:1367-72. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S88225. eCollection 2015.
采用晶状体超声粉碎术和超声劈核技术时超声乳化时间对角膜内皮的影响。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Sep;22(7):967-9. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(96)80200-8.
4
Risk factors for corneal endothelial injury during phacoemulsification.白内障超声乳化术中角膜内皮损伤的危险因素。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Oct;22(8):1079-84. doi: 10.1016/s0886-3350(96)80121-0.
5
Endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification in the pupillary plane.超声乳化术后瞳孔平面的内皮细胞丢失。
J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1981 Fall;7(4):334-6. doi: 10.1016/s0146-2776(81)80030-4.
6
Endothelial cell loss following "modern" phacoemulsification by a senior resident.一位高年住院医师进行“现代”超声乳化白内障吸除术后的内皮细胞丢失
Ophthalmic Surg. 1992 Mar;23(3):158-60.