跨学科实验：负责任的研究与创新和公共利益。
Experiments in interdisciplinarity: Responsible research and innovation and the public good.
机构信息
TIK Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Interdisciplinary Studies of Culture, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
出版信息
PLoS Biol. 2018 Mar 26;16(3):e2003921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003921. eCollection 2018 Mar.
Abstract
In Europe, responsible research and innovation (RRI) has emerged as a science policy measure that demands the early integration of a broad range of social actors and perspectives into research and development (R&D). More collaboration of the social sciences and humanities (SSH) with science and engineering appears within this policy framework as a crucial element that will enable better technological development. However, RRI is new to both natural scientists and SSH scholars, and interdisciplinary collaborations are challenging for many reasons. In this paper, we discuss these challenges while suggesting that what RRI can be in a particular project is not a given but remains an empirical question. Natural scientists and SSH scholars need to coresearch RRI in an experimental mode.
摘要
在欧洲，负责任的研究和创新（RRI）已经成为一项科学政策措施，要求将广泛的社会行为者和观点尽早纳入研究和开发（R&D）中。在这个政策框架内，社会科学和人文学科（SSH）与科学和工程学的更多合作被视为一个关键要素，这将使技术发展得更好。然而，RRI 对于自然科学家和 SSH 学者来说都是新的，而且跨学科合作由于多种原因具有挑战性。在本文中，我们讨论了这些挑战，同时表明 RRI 在特定项目中可以是什么并不是给定的，而是仍然是一个经验问题。自然科学家和 SSH 学者需要以实验模式共同研究 RRI。
相似文献
1
Experiments in interdisciplinarity: Responsible research and innovation and the public good.跨学科实验：负责任的研究与创新和公共利益。
PLoS Biol. 2018 Mar 26;16(3):e2003921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003921. eCollection 2018 Mar.
2
Interdisciplinary promises versus practices in medicine: the decoupled experiences of social sciences and humanities scholars.医学领域跨学科的承诺与实践：社会科学和人文学者的脱节经历
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Feb;126:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.004. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
3
Like a bridge over troubled water--Opening pathways for integrating social sciences and humanities into nuclear research.如 troubled water 上的桥梁——为社会科学和人文科学融入核研究开辟道路。 （注：原英文中“troubled water”直译为“浑浊的水”，这里意译为“困境”更符合语境，但按照要求未做意译调整）
J Environ Radioact. 2016 Mar;153:88-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
4
Identifying the challenges of interdisciplinary research on pornography use.识别色情使用的跨学科研究的挑战。
Cult Health Sex. 2020 May;22(5):599-613. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2019.1617898. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
5
Interdisciplinary Collaboration between Natural and Social Sciences - Status and Trends Exemplified in Groundwater Research.自然科学与社会科学的跨学科合作——以地下水研究为例的现状与趋势
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 27;12(1):e0170754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170754. eCollection 2017.
6
The why and how of enabling the integration of social and ethical aspects in research and development.使社会和伦理方面能够融入研究和开发的原因和方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Sep;19(3):703-25. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9423-2. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
7
Art-Science Collaboration in an EPSRC/BBSRC-Funded Synthetic Biology UK Research Centre.英国工程与物理科学研究委员会/生物技术与生物科学研究委员会资助的合成生物学研究中心中的艺术与科学合作。
Nanoethics. 2020;14(1):93-111. doi: 10.1007/s11569-020-00367-3. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
8
Double-edged sword of interdisciplinary knowledge flow from hard sciences to humanities and social sciences: Evidence from China.跨学科知识从硬科学流向人文社会科学的双刃剑：来自中国的证据。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 21;12(9):e0184977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184977. eCollection 2017.
9
Devices of Responsibility: Over a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation Initiatives for Nanotechnologies.责任装置：十余年纳米技术负责任研究与创新倡议
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Dec;24(6):1719-1746. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9978-z. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
10
Towards a strategic research agenda for social sciences and humanities in radiological protection.迈向放射防护领域社会科学与人文科学的战略研究议程。
J Radiol Prot. 2019 Sep;39(3):766-784. doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab0f89. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
引用本文的文献
1
Starting from hopelessness - grand challenges, sustainable development goals, and responsible research and innovation under urgency and uncertainty.从绝望出发——重大挑战、可持续发展目标以及在紧迫性和不确定性下的负责任研究与创新。
J Responsible Innov. 2025 May 22;12(1):2497609. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2025.2497609. eCollection 2025.
2
Governing beyond the project: Refocusing innovation governance in emerging science and technology funding.超越项目的治理：重新聚焦新兴科学技术资金的创新治理。
Soc Stud Sci. 2024 Jun;54(3):377-404. doi: 10.1177/03063127231205043. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
3
Contextualizing Security Innovation: Responsible Research and Innovation at the Smart Border?语境化安全创新：智慧边境的负责任研究与创新？
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Feb 18;27(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00292-y.
4
Quantifying simultaneous innovations in evolutionary medicine.量化进化医学中的同步创新。
Theory Biosci. 2020 Dec;139(4):319-335. doi: 10.1007/s12064-020-00333-3. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
5
The imagined scientist of science governance.科学治理中的想象中的科学家。
Soc Stud Sci. 2021 Apr;51(2):277-297. doi: 10.1177/0306312720962573. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
6
Consolidating RRI and Open Science: understanding the potential for transformative change.强化研究伦理与开放科学：理解变革潜力
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2020 Sep 1;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40504-020-00103-5.
7
"I am Primarily Paid for Publishing…": The Narrative Framing of Societal Responsibilities in Academic Life Science Research.“我主要是靠发表论文来获得报酬的……”：学术生命科学研究中社会责任的叙事框架。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Jun;26(3):1569-1593. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00191-8. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
8
Discussion structures as tools for public deliberation.讨论结构作为公众审议的工具。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Jan;29(1):76-93. doi: 10.1177/0963662519880675. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
9
Ethics as ritual: smoothing over moments of dislocation in biomedicine.伦理作为仪式：抚平生物医学中的错位时刻。
Sociol Health Illn. 2019 Mar;41(3):455-469. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12818. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
10
Creating life and the media: translations and echoes.创造生命与媒体：翻译与回响。
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2018 Aug 20;14(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40504-018-0087-9.
本文引用的文献
1
The co-production of what? Knowledge, values, and social relations in health care.共同产生了什么？医疗保健中的知识、价值观和社会关系。
PLoS Biol. 2017 May 3;15(5):e2001403. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403. eCollection 2017 May.
2
Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review.负责任的研究与创新的定义和概念维度：文献综述
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
3
A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation.一个具有动员作用的概念？剖析负责任的研究与创新的学术表述
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):81-103. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9761-6. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
4
Crafting the group: Care in research management.组建团队：研究管理中的注意事项。
Soc Stud Sci. 2015 Jun;45(3):371-93. doi: 10.1177/0306312715585820.
5
Standardising Responsibility? The Significance of Interstitial Spaces.规范责任？间隙空间的重要性。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Oct;21(5):1159-80. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9602-4. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
6
Designing de novo: interdisciplinary debates in synthetic biology.从头设计：合成生物学中的跨学科辩论。
Syst Synth Biol. 2013 Jun;7(1-2):41-50. doi: 10.1007/s11693-013-9106-6. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
7
Open engagement: exploring public participation in the biosciences.开放参与：探索公众对生物科学的参与
PLoS Biol. 2010 Nov 30;8(11):e1000549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000549.
8
Mind the gap revisited.重温“留意差距”。
Nat Nanotechnol. 2009 May;4(5):273-4. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.26.
9
Technologies of humility.谦逊的技术。
Nature. 2007 Nov 1;450(7166):33. doi: 10.1038/450033a.
Zotero 插件