Greenwood Pamela M, Parasuraman Raja
Arch Laboratory, Psychology Department, George Mason University Fairfax, VA, USA.
Front Aging Neurosci. 2010 Nov 29;2:150. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2010.00150. eCollection 2010.
What is the neurocognitive basis for the considerable individual differences observed in functioning of the adult mind and brain late in life? We review the evidence that in healthy old age the brain remains capable of both neuronal and cognitive plasticity, including in response to environmental and experiential factors. Neuronal plasticity (e.g., neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, cortical re-organization) refers to neuron-level changes that can be stimulated by experience. Cognitive plasticity (e.g., increased dependence on executive function) refers to adaptive changes in patterns of cognition related to brain activity. We hypothesize that successful cognitive aging requires interactions between these two forms of plasticity. Mechanisms of neural plasticity underpin cognitive plasticity and in turn, neural plasticity is stimulated by cognitive plasticity. We examine support for this hypothesis by considering evidence that neural plasticity is stimulated by learning and novelty and enhanced by both dietary manipulations (low-fat, dietary restriction) and aerobic exercise. We also examine evidence that cognitive plasticity is affected by education and training. This is a testable hypothesis which could be assessed in humans in randomized trials comparing separate and combined effects of cognitive training, exercise, and diet on measures of cognitive and brain integrity. Greater understanding of the factors influencing the course of cognitive aging and of the mechanisms underlying those factors could provide information on which people could base choices that improve their ability to age successfully.
在成年晚期,个体的心智和大脑功能存在显著差异,其神经认知基础是什么?我们回顾了相关证据,即在健康的老年阶段,大脑仍具备神经元可塑性和认知可塑性,包括对环境和经验因素的响应。神经元可塑性(如神经发生、突触形成、皮质重组)指的是可由经验刺激引发的神经元水平的变化。认知可塑性(如对执行功能的依赖增加)指的是与大脑活动相关的认知模式的适应性变化。我们假设,成功的认知老化需要这两种可塑性形式之间的相互作用。神经可塑性机制支撑着认知可塑性,反过来,神经可塑性又受到认知可塑性的刺激。我们通过考量以下证据来检验这一假设:神经可塑性受学习和新奇事物的刺激,并通过饮食干预(低脂、饮食限制)和有氧运动得以增强。我们还研究了认知可塑性受教育和训练影响的证据。这是一个可检验的假设,可在人体中通过随机试验进行评估,该试验比较认知训练、运动和饮食对认知及大脑完整性指标的单独和综合影响。对影响认知老化进程的因素以及这些因素背后机制的更深入理解,可为人们做出改善成功老化能力的选择提供依据。