• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重症监护病房患者入院标准及相关死亡率

Criteria for patient admission to an intensive care unit and related mortality rates.

作者信息

Caldeira Vanessa Maria Horta, Silva Júnior João Manoel, Oliveira Amanda Maria Ribas Rosa de, Rezende Seyna, Araújo Leonardo Atem Golçalves de, Santana Marcus Ribeiro de Oliveira, Amendola Cristina Prata, Rezende Ederlon

机构信息

Terapia Intensiva do Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2010 Sep-Oct;56(5):528-34. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302010000500012.

DOI:10.1590/s0104-42302010000500012
PMID:21152823
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate criteria used in clinical practice, for screening of patients for ICU admission.

METHODS

Cohort prospective study in a tertiary hospital. Four groups were compared in relation to ICU admission by ranking priorities into groups 1, 2, 3 and 4; highest priority 1, lowest priority 4.

RESULTS

Enrolled were 359 patients, 66 (53.2-75.0) years old. APACHE II was 23 (18-30). The ICU made available 70.4% of beds. Patients who were refused beds in the ICU were older, 66.2 ± 16.1 versus 61.9 ± 15.2 years of age (p= 0.02) and the priority 1 group had less refusal of beds, which means, 39.1% versus 23.8% had beds refused (p=0.01). The opposite occurred with priorities 3 and 4. Patients in priority 3 and 4 showed older ages, score system and more organ dysfunctions as well as more refusals of beds. ICU mortality rates were higher for priority groups 3 and 4 when compared to 1 and 2 priority groups, 86.7% versus 31.3% (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Age, score system and organ dysfunctions were greater in priority groups 3 and 4 and these were related with refusal from the ICU. Patients refused admission to the ICU showed higher mortality rates and these remained higher among priority groups 3 and 4 even when patients were admitted to the ICU.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估临床实践中用于筛选入住重症监护病房(ICU)患者的标准。

方法

在一家三级医院进行队列前瞻性研究。通过将优先级分为1、2、3和4组来比较四组患者的ICU入住情况;优先级1最高,优先级4最低。

结果

共纳入359例患者,年龄66(53.2 - 75.0)岁。急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)评分为23(18 - 30)。ICU病床使用率为70.4%。被拒绝入住ICU的患者年龄更大,分别为66.2±16.1岁和61.9±15.2岁(p = 0.02),且优先级1组的床位拒绝率较低,即39.1%对比23.8%的床位被拒绝(p = 0.01)。优先级3和4组情况相反。优先级3和4组的患者年龄更大、评分系统更高、器官功能障碍更多,床位拒绝率也更高。与优先级1和2组相比,优先级3和4组的ICU死亡率更高,分别为86.7%对比31.3%(p < 0.001)。

结论

优先级3和4组患者的年龄、评分系统和器官功能障碍更为严重,这些与被ICU拒绝有关。被拒绝入住ICU的患者死亡率更高,即使这些患者最终入住了ICU,优先级3和4组的死亡率仍然较高。

相似文献

1
Criteria for patient admission to an intensive care unit and related mortality rates.重症监护病房患者入院标准及相关死亡率
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2010 Sep-Oct;56(5):528-34. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302010000500012.
2
Prospective evaluation of patients refused admission to an intensive care unit: triage, futility and outcome.对拒绝入住重症监护病房患者的前瞻性评估:分诊、无效治疗与结局
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Sep;27(9):1459-65. doi: 10.1007/s001340101041.
3
Outcomes of nighttime refusal of admission to the intensive care unit: The role of the intensivist in triage.夜间拒绝入住重症监护病房的后果:重症医学专家在分诊中的作用。
J Crit Care. 2017 Jun;39:214-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.12.024. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
4
Determinants and outcomes associated with decisions to deny intensive care unit admission in Tunisian ICU.突尼斯重症监护病房拒绝重症监护病房收治决定的相关因素及结果。
Pan Afr Med J. 2018 Mar 26;29:176. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2018.29.176.13099. eCollection 2018.
5
Extent and pattern of intensive care unit refusal in Tunisian 3rd line hospitals.突尼斯三线医院重症监护病房拒收情况的范围和模式。
Tunis Med. 2018 Oct-Nov;96(10-11):746-753.
6
Evaluation of triage decisions for intensive care admission.重症监护病房入院分诊决策的评估
Crit Care Med. 1999 Jun;27(6):1073-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199906000-00021.
7
Refusal of intensive care unit admission due to a full unit: impact on mortality.因病房满员而拒绝入住重症监护病房:对死亡率的影响。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 May 15;185(10):1081-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201104-0729OC. Epub 2012 Feb 16.
8
Predictors of intensive care unit refusal in French intensive care units: a multiple-center study.法国重症监护病房拒绝入住的预测因素:一项多中心研究。
Crit Care Med. 2005 Apr;33(4):750-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000157752.26180.f1.
9
Triaging patients to the ICU: a pilot study of factors influencing admission decisions and patient outcomes.对患者进行重症监护病房(ICU)分诊:一项关于影响收治决策和患者预后因素的试点研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2003 May;29(5):774-81. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1709-z. Epub 2003 Apr 2.
10
Verification of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scoring system in a Hong Kong intensive care unit.香港一间重症监护病房中急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估评分系统的验证
Crit Care Med. 1993 May;21(5):698-705. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199305000-00013.

引用本文的文献

1
Refusal of beds and triage of patients admitted to intensive care units in Brazil: a cross-sectional national survey.巴西重症监护病房收治患者的拒诊和分诊:一项全国性横断面调查。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2022 Oct-Dec;34(4):484-491. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20220264-pt.
2
Use of intensive care unit priority model in directing intensive care unit admission in Sudan: A prospective cross-sectional study.重症监护病房优先级模型在苏丹指导重症监护病房收治中的应用:一项前瞻性横断面研究。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2021 Jan-Mar;11(1):9-13. doi: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_8_20. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
3
Referral to immediate postoperative care in an intensive care unit from the perspective of anesthesiologists, surgeons, and intensive care physicians: a cross-sectional questionnaire.
从麻醉师、外科医生和重症监护医生的角度来看,将患者转至重症监护病房进行术后即刻治疗:一项横断面问卷调查。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021 May-Jun;71(3):265-270. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.03.025. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
4
The predictive power of SAPS-3 and SOFA scores and their relations with patient outcomes in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.外科重症监护病房中SAPS-3和SOFA评分的预测能力及其与患者预后的关系。
Turk J Surg. 2019 Jun 13;35(2):124-130. doi: 10.5578/turkjsurg.4223. eCollection 2019 Jun.
5
The Ability of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV Score to Predict Mortality in a Single Tertiary Hospital.急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)IV评分在某三级医院预测死亡率的能力。
Korean J Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug;32(3):275-283. doi: 10.4266/kjccm.2016.00990. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
6
Critical Care Utilization in Patients with Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Stroke, and Gastrointestinal Bleed: Two Hospitals Experience.
Cureus. 2019 May 21;11(5):e4698. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4698.
7
Decision-making in intensive care medicine - A review.重症监护医学中的决策——综述
J Intensive Care Soc. 2018 Aug;19(3):247-258. doi: 10.1177/1751143717746566. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
8
Multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter species: a seven-year experience from a tertiary care center in Lebanon.多药耐药不动杆菌属:来自黎巴嫩一家三级护理中心的七年经验。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Jan 22;7:9. doi: 10.1186/s13756-017-0297-6. eCollection 2018.
9
Effect of Emergency Department and ICU Occupancy on Admission Decisions and Outcomes for Critically Ill Patients.急诊和 ICU 占用对危重症患者入院决策和结局的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2018 May;46(5):720-727. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002993.
10
Qualitative Analysis of Surveyed Emergency Responders and the Identified Factors That Affect First Stage of Primary Triage Decision-Making of Mass Casualty Incidents.对受访应急响应人员及影响大规模伤亡事件初级分诊决策第一阶段的已识别因素的定性分析。
PLoS Curr. 2016 Aug 19;8:ecurrents.dis.d69dafcfb3ad8be88b3e655bd38fba84. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.d69dafcfb3ad8be88b3e655bd38fba84.