Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, 113 W. 60th St., New York, NY 10023, USA.
J Health Commun. 2010;15 Suppl 3:236-51. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.522693.
This study used data from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey, a national sample of U.S. households (N = 5,586), to (1) explore the extent to which specific sources of health information are associated with certain beliefs about cancer; and (2) examine whether the relationship between health information sources and beliefs about cancer is moderated by psychological distress. Health information on the local news was associated with greater ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.02-1.46, p < .05), while less ambiguity was associated with cancer-specific information (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.94, p < .05), health information in the newspaper (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.97, p < .05), and health information on the Internet (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61-0.84, p < .001). Health information on the local news was also associated with lower likelihood of higher perceived relative risk of cancer (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.86, p < .01). No source of information was associated with the belief that cancer is primarily caused by behavior/lifestyle factors. Psychological distress greatly increased the optimistic bias of those who read health information in the news (OR 3.68, 95% CI 1.69-8.03, p < .001) but had no other moderating effect. Findings suggest that information seeking using active channels of health information decreases ambiguity and corrects for optimistic bias.
本研究利用了 2005 年健康信息国家趋势调查的数据,该调查是一项针对美国家庭的全国性抽样调查(N=5586),旨在(1)探讨特定健康信息来源与某些癌症观念之间的关联程度;(2)考察健康信息来源与癌症观念之间的关系是否受到心理困扰的调节。当地新闻中的健康信息与对癌症预防建议的不确定性增加有关(优势比 1.22,95%置信区间 1.02-1.46,p<.05),而与癌症特异性信息相关的不确定性则降低(优势比 0.81,95%置信区间 0.69-0.94,p<.05),报纸中的健康信息(优势比 0.82,95%置信区间 0.69-0.97,p<.05)和互联网上的健康信息(优势比 0.71,95%置信区间 0.61-0.84,p<.001)。当地新闻中的健康信息也与人们认为癌症的相对风险较低的可能性降低有关(优势比 0.67,95%置信区间 0.52-0.86,p<.01)。没有信息来源与癌症主要由行为/生活方式因素引起的信念有关。心理困扰极大地增加了那些阅读新闻中的健康信息的人的乐观偏见(优势比 3.68,95%置信区间 1.69-8.03,p<.001),但没有其他调节作用。研究结果表明,通过积极的健康信息渠道获取信息可以减少不确定性并纠正乐观偏见。