• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自由回忆中的测试效应与增强的组织过程有关。

The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes.

机构信息

Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2010 Dec;38(8):995-1008. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.8.995.

DOI:10.3758/MC.38.8.995
PMID:21156864
Abstract

In two experiments with categorized lists, we asked whether the testing effect in free recall is related to enhancements in organizational processing. During a first phase in Experiment 1, subjects studied one list over eight consecutive trials, they studied another list six times while taking two interspersed recall tests, and they learned a third list in four alternating study and test trials. On a test 2 days later, recall was directly related to the number of tests and inversely related to the number of study trials. In addition, increased testing enhanced both the number of categories accessed and the number of items recalled from within those categories. One measure of organization also increased with the number of tests. In a second experiment, different groups of subjects studied a list either once or twice before a final criterial test, or they studied the list once and took an initial recall test before the final test. Prior testing again enhanced recall, relative to studying on the final test a day later, and also improved category clustering. The results suggest that the benefit of testing in free recall learning arises because testing creates retrieval schemas that guide recall.

摘要

在两个有分类列表的实验中,我们研究了自由回忆中的测试效应是否与组织加工的增强有关。在实验 1 的第一阶段,被试在连续八次试验中学习一个列表,在两次穿插的回忆测试中学习另一个列表六次,在四个交替的学习和测试试验中学习第三个列表。两天后的测试中,回忆与测试次数直接相关,与学习次数成反比。此外,增加测试不仅提高了所访问的类别数量,还提高了从这些类别中回忆的项目数量。组织的一个衡量标准也随着测试次数的增加而增加。在第二个实验中,不同组的被试在最后一个关键测试前要么只学习一次列表,要么学习两次,要么学习一次并在最后一次测试前进行初始回忆测试。与第二天在最后一次测试中学习相比,之前的测试再次增强了回忆,也提高了类别聚类。结果表明,测试在自由回忆学习中的益处是因为测试创建了指导回忆的检索图式。

相似文献

1
The testing effect in free recall is associated with enhanced organizational processes.自由回忆中的测试效应与增强的组织过程有关。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Dec;38(8):995-1008. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.8.995.
2
Temporal associations and prior-list intrusions in free recall.自由回忆中的时间关联和先前列表干扰。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jul;32(4):792-804. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.792.
3
Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: Similar patterns of rehearsal and similar effects of word length, presentation rate, and articulatory suppression.考察自由回忆与即时系列回忆之间的关系:复述模式相似,且词长、呈现速度和发音抑制的影响相似。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Jul;37(5):689-713. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.5.689.
4
Social processing improves recall performance.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):197-201. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.197.
5
Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials?扩展检索是学习文本材料的优越方法吗?
Mem Cognit. 2010 Jan;38(1):116-24. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.1.116.
6
Benefits of testing for nontested information: retrieval-induced facilitation of episodically bound material.对未测试信息进行测试的益处:检索诱导对情景关联材料的促进作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Dec;21(6):1516-23. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0625-2.
7
Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.协作记忆中的年龄差异:提取操作的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Oct;37(7):962-75. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.7.962.
8
Reduced interference from memory testing: A postretrieval monitoring account.记忆测试干扰减少:一种检索后监测解释
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Jul;43(7):1063-1072. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000377. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
9
Can intentional forgetting reduce false memory? Effects of list-level and item-level forgetting.有意遗忘能减少错误记忆吗?列表层面和项目层面遗忘的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jan;127(1):146-53. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.03.004. Epub 2007 May 1.
10
Paradoxical effects of testing: repeated retrieval attempts enhance the likelihood of later accurate and false recall.测试的矛盾效应:反复的检索尝试会增加随后准确回忆和错误回忆的可能性。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Mar;34(2):261-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03193404.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpolated Retrieval of Relevant Material, Not Irrelevant Material, Enhances New Learning of a Video Lecture In-Person and Online.插入相关而非不相关的材料,可增强线下和线上视频讲座的新学习效果。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 14;15(5):668. doi: 10.3390/bs15050668.
2
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with retrieval practice on semantic memory in patients with schizophrenia.经颅直流电刺激联合提取练习对精神分裂症患者语义记忆的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06530-y.
3
Does difficulty moderate learning? A comparative analysis of the desirable difficulties framework and cognitive load theory.

本文引用的文献

1
Learning for Life: An Ecological Approach to Pedagogical Research.终身学习:教学研究的生态方法。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2009 Jan;4(1):91-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01095.x.
2
The Power of Testing Memory: Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice.测试记忆的力量:基础研究及其对教育实践的启示。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Sep;1(3):181-210. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x.
3
Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying.重复测试比重复学习产生更好的学习迁移。
难度会调节学习吗?对合意困难框架和认知负荷理论的比较分析。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Dec 24;78(10):17470218241308143. doi: 10.1177/17470218241308143.
4
Free-recall retrieval practice tasks for students with ADHD: whole-text versus section recall.多动症学生的自由回忆检索练习任务:全文回忆与部分回忆
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 27;14:1301726. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1301726. eCollection 2023.
5
The testing effect for visual materials depends on preexisting knowledge.视觉材料的测试效应取决于已有知识。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Oct;49(10):1557-1571. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001248. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
6
Retrieval practice may not benefit mathematical word-problem solving.检索练习可能对解决数学文字问题没有帮助。
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 20;14:1093653. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1093653. eCollection 2023.
7
"Studying cognitive reappraisal as an antidote to the effect of negative emotions on medical residents' learning: a randomized experiment"."研究认知重评作为减轻负性情绪对医学住院医师学习影响的方法:一项随机实验"。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 28;23(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03996-2.
8
Memory load differentially influences younger and older users' learning curve of touchscreen gestures.记忆负荷会对年轻和年长用户学习触摸屏手势的曲线产生不同影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 25;12(1):10814. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15092-y.
9
A Pilot Study Comparing Cued Versus Recognition Recall Question Design on Medical Student Utilization, Effectiveness, and Perceptions of Pharmacology Educational Games.一项关于线索回忆与识别回忆问题设计对医学生药理学教育游戏利用率、有效性及认知影响的初步研究。
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Jul 26;29(4):901-904. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00775-5. eCollection 2019 Dec.
10
Homework questions designed to require higher-order cognitive skills in an undergraduate animal physiology course did not produce desirable difficulties, testing effects, or improvements in information retention.在本科动物生理学课程中,设计需要更高阶认知技能的作业题并没有产生理想的困难、测试效应或提高信息保留。
J Anim Sci. 2021 Sep 1;99(9). doi: 10.1093/jas/skab246.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Sep;36(5):1118-33. doi: 10.1037/a0019902.
4
The benefits and costs of repeated testing on the learning of face-name pairs in healthy older adults.重复测试对健康老年人面孔-姓名配对学习的益处和成本。
Psychol Aging. 2010 Dec;25(4):833-45. doi: 10.1037/a0019933.
5
The effects of free recall testing on subsequent source memory.自由回忆测试对随后的来源记忆的影响。
Memory. 2010 May;18(4):385-93. doi: 10.1080/09658211003702163. Epub 2010 Apr 19.
6
Tests enhance the transfer of learning.测试增强了学习的迁移。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Jan;36(1):233-9. doi: 10.1037/a0017678.
7
Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.元认知控制与策略选择:在学习中决定进行检索练习。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Nov;138(4):469-86. doi: 10.1037/a0017341.
8
Testing during study insulates against the buildup of proactive interference.在学习过程中进行测试可防止前摄干扰的积累。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008 Nov;34(6):1392-9. doi: 10.1037/a0013082.
9
The critical importance of retrieval for learning.检索对学习的至关重要性。
Science. 2008 Feb 15;319(5865):966-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1152408.
10
PyEPL: a cross-platform experiment-programming library.PyEPL:一个跨平台的实验编程库。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Nov;39(4):950-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03192990.