• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparing patient and endoscopist perceptions of the colonoscopy indication.比较患者与内镜医师对结肠镜检查适应证的认知。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;24(11):656-60. doi: 10.1155/2010/328178.
2
Different screening definitions have little impact on polypectomy rate estimates.不同的筛查定义对息肉切除率估计的影响很小。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2012 Nov;26(11):791-4. doi: 10.1155/2012/986153.
3
Accuracy of Referring Provider and Endoscopist Impressions of Colonoscopy Indication.内镜检查适应证中,参照提供者和内镜医生印象的准确性。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017 Jul;15(7):920-925. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0123.
4
Qualitative study of physician perspectives on classifying screening and nonscreening colonoscopy using administrative health data: adding practice does not make perfect.利用行政健康数据对医生关于筛查结肠镜检查和非筛查结肠镜检查分类观点的定性研究:增加实践并不能做到完美。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;26(12):889-93. doi: 10.1155/2012/176714.
5
Endoscopist specialty is associated with colonoscopy quality.内镜医师专业水平与结肠镜检查质量相关。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2013 May 3;13:78. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-78.
6
Maximizing the general success of cecal intubation during propofol sedation in a multi-endoscopist academic centre.在多内镜医师学术中心,在异丙酚镇静期间最大限度地提高盲肠插管的总体成功率。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Oct 20;10:123. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-123.
7
Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy: Is Indication a Predictor?结肠镜检查中的腺瘤检出率:指征是一个预测指标吗?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016 Apr;26(2):156-61. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000253.
8
Association of Adenoma and Proximal Sessile Serrated Polyp Detection Rates With Endoscopist Characteristics.腺瘤和近端无蒂锯齿状息肉检出率与内镜医师特征的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2019 Jul 1;154(7):627-635. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0564.
9
Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).免疫化学粪便潜血试验在结直肠癌筛查项目中结肠镜检查的质量:EQuIPE 研究(评估内镜性能质量指标)。
Gut. 2015 Sep;64(9):1389-96. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307954. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
10
Identifying Gender Barriers for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Assessing the Need for a Multigender Endoscopy Team: A Prospective Multicenter Study.识别结直肠癌筛查中的性别障碍,并评估多性别内镜团队的需求:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Aug 1;116(8):1646-1656. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001318.

引用本文的文献

1
Importance of determining indication for colonoscopy: implications for practice and policy original.确定结肠镜检查适应证的重要性:对实践和政策的影响 原创
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Dec;12(12):1958-63.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.028.
2
Screening polypectomy rates below quality benchmarks: a prospective study.低于质量基准的息肉切除筛查率:一项前瞻性研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 21;20(43):16300-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i43.16300.
3
The colorectal cancer screening process in community settings: a conceptual model for the population-based research optimizing screening through personalized regimens consortium.社区环境中的结直肠癌筛查流程:基于人群研究的概念模型,通过个性化方案联盟优化筛查
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jul;23(7):1147-58. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1217. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
4
Developing model-based algorithms to identify screening colonoscopies using administrative health databases.开发基于模型的算法,以利用行政健康数据库识别筛查结肠镜检查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 10;13:45. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-45.
5
Different screening definitions have little impact on polypectomy rate estimates.不同的筛查定义对息肉切除率估计的影响很小。
Can J Gastroenterol. 2012 Nov;26(11):791-4. doi: 10.1155/2012/986153.

本文引用的文献

1
Yield of claims data and surveys for determining colon cancer screening among health plan members.用于确定健康计划成员中结肠癌筛查情况的理赔数据和调查结果
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Mar;18(3):726-31. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0751.
2
Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium.结肠镜检查报告质量评估:多中心联盟的结果
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):645-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.034.
3
A dialogic model of conversations about risk: coordinating perceptions and achieving quality decisions in cancer care.关于风险的对话式沟通模型:在癌症护理中协调认知并做出高质量决策。
Soc Sci Med. 2009 Apr;68(8):1506-12. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.016. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
4
How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes.沟通如何促进康复?连接临床医生与患者沟通和健康结果的途径。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar;74(3):295-301. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
5
Self-report versus medical records for assessing cancer-preventive services delivery.用于评估癌症预防服务提供情况的自我报告与医疗记录对比
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Nov;17(11):2987-94. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0177.
6
Validation of a questionnaire to assess self-reported colorectal cancer screening status using face-to-face administration.一份用于评估自我报告的结直肠癌筛查状况的问卷通过面对面访谈方式进行的验证。
Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Jun;54(6):1297-306. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0471-z. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
7
Access to specialist gastroenterology care in Canada: the Practice Audit in Gastroenterology (PAGE) Wait Times Program.加拿大专科胃肠病护理的获取情况:胃肠病实践审计(PAGE)等待时间项目
Can J Gastroenterol. 2008 Feb;22(2):155-60. doi: 10.1155/2008/292948.
8
The multidisciplinary management of gastrointestinal cancer. Colorectal cancer screening.胃肠道癌的多学科管理。结直肠癌筛查。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;21(6):1031-48. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2007.09.004.
9
Data sources for measuring colorectal endoscopy use among Medicare enrollees.衡量医疗保险参保者结直肠内镜检查使用情况的数据来源。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Oct;16(10):2118-27. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0123.
10
Validation of self-reported history of colorectal cancer screening.自我报告的结直肠癌筛查病史的验证。
Can Fam Physician. 2007 Jul;53(7):1192-7.

比较患者与内镜医师对结肠镜检查适应证的认知。

Comparing patient and endoscopist perceptions of the colonoscopy indication.

作者信息

Sewitch Maida J, Stein Dara, Joseph Lawrence, Bitton Alain, Hilsden Robert J, Rabeneck Linda, Paszat Lawrence, Tinmouth Jill, Cooper Mary Anne

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec.

出版信息

Can J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;24(11):656-60. doi: 10.1155/2010/328178.

DOI:10.1155/2010/328178
PMID:21157580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3004418/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

determining whether a colonoscopy is performed for screening or nonscreening purposes can facilitate clinical practice and research. However, there is no simple method to determine the colonoscopy indication using patient medical files or health administrative databases.

OBJECTIVE

to determine patient-endoscopist agreement on the colonoscopy indication.

METHODS

a cross-sectional study was conducted among staff endoscopists and their patients at seven university-affiliated hospitals in Montreal, Quebec. The study participants were 50 to 75 years of age, they were able to understand English or French, and were about to undergo colonoscopy. Self- (endoscopist) and interviewer-administered (patient) questionnaires ascertained information that permitted classification of the colonoscopy indication. Patient colonoscopy indication was defined as the following: perceived screening (routine screening, family history, age); perceived nonscreening (follow-up); medical history that implied nonscreening; and a combination of the three preceding indications. Agreement between patient and endoscopist indications was measured using concordance and Kappa statistic.

RESULTS

in total, 702 patients and 38 endoscopists participated. The three most common reasons for undergoing colonoscopy were routine screening⁄regular check-up (33.8%), follow-up to a previous problem (30.2%) and other problem (24.6%). Concordance (range 0.79 to 0.85) and Kappa (range 0.58 to 0.70) were highest for perceived nonscreening colonoscopy. Recent large bowel symptoms accounted for 120 occurrences of disagreement in which the patient perceived a nonscreening colonoscopy while the endoscopist perceived a screening colonoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

patient self-report may be an acceptable means for rapidly assessing whether a colonoscopy is performed for screening or nonscreening purposes. Delivery of patient-centred care may help patients and endoscopists reach a shared understanding of the reason for colonoscopy.

摘要

背景

确定结肠镜检查是用于筛查还是非筛查目的有助于临床实践和研究。然而,使用患者病历或健康管理数据库来确定结肠镜检查指征并没有简单的方法。

目的

确定患者与内镜医师在结肠镜检查指征方面的一致性。

方法

在魁北克省蒙特利尔市的7家大学附属医院对在职内镜医师及其患者进行了一项横断面研究。研究参与者年龄在50至75岁之间,能够理解英语或法语,且即将接受结肠镜检查。通过自我(内镜医师)和访谈者管理(患者)问卷确定了可用于对结肠镜检查指征进行分类的信息。患者结肠镜检查指征定义如下:感知到的筛查(常规筛查、家族史、年龄);感知到的非筛查(随访);暗示非筛查的病史;以及前三种指征的组合。使用一致性和卡帕统计量来衡量患者和内镜医师指征之间的一致性。

结果

共有702名患者和38名内镜医师参与。进行结肠镜检查的三个最常见原因是常规筛查/定期检查(33.8%)、对先前问题的随访(30.2%)和其他问题(24.6%)。对于感知到的非筛查结肠镜检查,一致性(范围为0.79至0.85)和卡帕值(范围为0.58至0.70)最高。近期大肠症状导致120例不一致情况,即患者认为是非筛查结肠镜检查而内镜医师认为是筛查结肠镜检查。

结论

患者自我报告可能是快速评估结肠镜检查是用于筛查还是非筛查目的的可接受方法。提供以患者为中心的护理可能有助于患者和内镜医师就结肠镜检查的原因达成共同理解。