Woods Kevin E, Willingham Field F
Kevin E Woods, Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 May 16;2(5):165-78. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i5.165.
The aim of this article is to review the literature regarding post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. We searched for and evaluated all articles describing the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathophysiology, morbidity, mortality and prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) in adult patients using the PubMed database. Search terms included endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, pancreatitis, ampulla of vater, endoscopic sphincterotomy, balloon dilatation, cholangiography, adverse events, standards and utilization. We limited our review of articles to those published between January 1, 1994 and August 15, 2009 regarding human adults and written in the English language. Publications from the reference sections were reviewed and included if they were salient and fell into the time period of interest. Between the dates queried, seventeen large (> 500 patients) prospective and four large retrospective trials were conducted. PEP occurred in 1%-15% in the prospective trials and in 1%-4% in the retrospective trials. PEP was also reduced with pancreatic duct stent placement and outcomes were improved with endoscopic sphincterotomy compared to balloon sphincter dilation in the setting of choledocholithiasis. Approximately 34 pharmacologic agents have been evaluated for the prevention of PEP over the last fifteen years in 63 trials. Although 22 of 63 trials published during our period of review suggested a reduction in PEP, no pharmacologic therapy has been widely accepted in clinical use in decreasing the development of PEP. In conclusion, PEP is a well-recognized complication of ERCP. Medical treatment for prevention has been disappointing. Proper patient selection and pancreatic duct stenting have been shown to reduce the complication rate in randomized clinical trials.
本文旨在综述有关内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后胰腺炎的文献。我们使用PubMed数据库搜索并评估了所有描述成年患者ERCP后胰腺炎(PEP)的诊断、流行病学、病理生理学、发病率、死亡率及预防的文章。搜索词包括内镜逆行胰胆管造影术、胰腺炎、 Vater壶腹、内镜括约肌切开术、球囊扩张术、胆管造影、不良事件、标准及应用。我们将文章综述限定为1994年1月1日至2009年8月15日期间发表的、关于成年患者且为英文撰写的文章。对参考文献部分的出版物进行了综述,若其具有显著意义且属于感兴趣的时间段,则予以纳入。在查询的日期之间,开展了17项大型(> 500例患者)前瞻性试验和4项大型回顾性试验。前瞻性试验中PEP的发生率为1% - 15%,回顾性试验中为1% - 4%。在胆总管结石的情况下,放置胰管支架也可降低PEP的发生率,与球囊括约肌扩张术相比,内镜括约肌切开术可改善预后。在过去15年中,约34种药物在63项试验中被评估用于预防PEP。尽管在我们综述期间发表的63项试验中有22项表明PEP有所减少,但尚无药物疗法在临床应用中被广泛接受以降低PEP的发生。总之,PEP是ERCP一种公认的并发症。预防的药物治疗效果令人失望。在随机临床试验中已表明,合理选择患者和放置胰管支架可降低并发症发生率。