Smith Gregory C, Whitbourne Susan K
State U New York, Ringel Inst of Gerontology, Albany.
Psychol Aging. 1990 Jun;5(2):228-235. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.5.2.228.
The Sheltered Care Environment Scale (SCES) and a parallel open-ended interview were administered to 25 residents of a geriatric long-term-care facility. A multitrait-multimethod validity matrix was generated and contained intercorrelations among the 7 subscales of the SCES and interview ratings. Evidence of construct validity was strong for the subscales of conflict, resident influence, and self-exploration; moderate for organization; and lacking for cohesion, independence, and physical comfort. The lack of validity for these 3 subscales was revealed by a content analysis of interview responses. Items in these subscales do not sufficiently encompass major aspects of the environmental dimensions they are purported to measure.
对一家老年长期护理机构的25名居民进行了庇护护理环境量表（SCES）测试，并进行了一次平行的开放式访谈。生成了一个多特质-多方法效度矩阵，其中包含SCES的7个分量表与访谈评分之间的相互关系。冲突、居民影响力和自我探索分量表的结构效度证据很强；组织分量表的结构效度中等；凝聚力、独立性和身体舒适度分量表缺乏结构效度。对访谈回复的内容分析揭示了这3个分量表缺乏效度。这些分量表中的项目没有充分涵盖它们声称要测量的环境维度的主要方面。
