庇护性护理环境量表的效度：对莱姆克和穆斯（1990年）的回应
Validity of the Sheltered Care Environment Scale: rejoinder to Lemke and Moos (1990).
作者信息
Smith Gregory C, Whitbourne Susan K
机构信息
State U New York, Ringel Inst of Gerontology, Albany.
出版信息
Psychol Aging. 1990 Dec;5(4):572-573. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.5.4.572.
In a previous article, based on open-ended interviews with residents of 1 facility, questions were raised about the construct validity of 3 of the 7 subscales of the Sheltered Care Environment Scale. Lemke and Moos (1990) criticized the sampling of a single facility as having an inappropriate focus on individual differences. Their criticisms are addressed, and a dialectic approach is recommended for use in qualitative analyses for construction and validation of quantitative measures of geriatric residential settings.
在之前的一篇文章中，基于对一家机构居民的开放式访谈，有人对庇护性护理环境量表7个分量表中的3个分量表的结构效度提出了质疑。莱姆克和穆斯（1990）批评仅对一家机构进行抽样，认为这样不适当地聚焦于个体差异。他们的批评得到了回应，并推荐采用辩证方法用于对老年居住环境定量测量的构建和验证进行定性分析。
Zotero 插件