Cassidy Rebecca
IDS, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
AIDS Care. 2010;22 Suppl 2:1598-605. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2010.525612.
This paper looks at the ways that people living with HIV in the Gambia, as members of HIV support groups, engaged with the programmes available to them in this context. People living with HIV engage with the global in a variety of ways. Following Ong and Collier this paper analyses the way in which people in this context experience and negotiate with the "global assemblage" around international HIV work. This can be observed in everyday practice in the formation of networks and partnerships linking people and their activities into international structures. Using qualitative methods and a grounded theoretical approach, the research followed events around HIV treatment in the Gambia 2006-2007. Looking at the support societies and their members' struggles to gain some material support, findings show how support group members negotiated and expressed agency within the available structures. They make use of accepted frames of international action which bypass the state, presenting an internationally linked "biological citizenship" which brings associated opportunities to access resources. Through the intervention of the president and his "cure" programme, this case also illustrates that people's commitment to the value structures implicit in these funding streams may not be as strong as might be assumed. In these circumstances two alternate treatment programmes, linked to very different values, were on offer, both backed up by the powerful machinery of either the state or international funding. The negotiation by people living with HIV of these avenues through which to acquire benefits and so support and health, calls into question assumptions of a "buy in" to global ideas and values without further scrutiny of the ways in which such assemblages function in different contexts.
本文探讨了冈比亚的艾滋病毒感染者作为艾滋病毒支持小组的成员,在这种背景下参与可获得的项目的方式。艾滋病毒感染者以多种方式与全球产生联系。遵循翁和科利尔的观点,本文分析了在这种背景下人们如何体验并与围绕国际艾滋病毒防治工作的“全球组合”进行协商。这一点可以在日常实践中观察到,即形成将人们及其活动与国际结构联系起来的网络和伙伴关系。本研究采用定性方法和扎根理论方法,追踪了2006 - 2007年冈比亚围绕艾滋病毒治疗的相关事件。通过观察支持团体及其成员为获得一些物质支持而进行的斗争,研究结果表明了支持小组成员在现有结构内如何进行协商并表达能动性。他们利用绕过国家的国际行动公认框架,呈现出一种与国际相连的“生物公民身份”,这带来了获取资源的相关机会。通过总统的干预及其“治愈”计划,该案例还表明,人们对这些资金流所隐含的价值结构的认同可能并不像预期的那么强烈。在这种情况下,提供了两个与截然不同的价值观相关的替代治疗方案,且都得到了国家或国际资金的强大支持。艾滋病毒感染者对这些获取福利、支持和健康途径的协商,对那种未经进一步审视此类组合在不同背景下如何运作就“接受”全球理念和价值观的假设提出了质疑。