使用静态和动态媒体模拟环境：一项荟萃分析。

Use of static and dynamic media to simulate environments: a meta-analysis.

机构信息

Institute of Environmental Quality, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 2010 Oct;111(2):355-64. doi: 10.2466/22.24.27.PMS.111.5.355-364.

DOI:10.2466/22.24.27.PMS.111.5.355-364

Abstract

This article is a review of studies on how strongly responses from static media (such as color slides) and dynamic media (such as virtual reality models) compared to onsite evaluations or to each other. Eighty-four empirical findings were found. 6,323 participants and 967 environments were included in the review. The overall correlation of subjective responses obtained either onsite or by viewing static color simulations was r = .86. The overall correlation of subjective responses obtained either onsite or by viewing dynamic simulations was r = .83. The overall correlation of subjective responses obtained either from static or dynamic media was r = .82. It is suggested that both types of simulation generate statistically equivalent results and so a choice of simulation media should be based on efficacy rather than concerns about validity.

摘要

本文综述了有关静态媒体（如彩色幻灯片）和动态媒体（如虚拟现实模型）与现场评估或彼此之间的响应强度的研究。共发现了 84 项实证研究结果。本研究共纳入了 6323 名参与者和 967 个环境。无论是在现场获得的还是通过观看静态彩色模拟获得的主观反应的总体相关性 r =.86。无论是在现场获得的还是通过观看动态模拟获得的主观反应的总体相关性 r =.83。无论是通过静态媒体还是动态媒体获得的主观反应的总体相关性 r =.82。研究表明，这两种类型的模拟都产生了统计学上等效的结果，因此模拟媒体的选择应该基于功效而不是对有效性的担忧。