Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds - Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, UK.
Health Policy Plan. 2011 Nov;26(6):471-84. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq080. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
Strengthening good governance and preventing corruption in health care are universal challenges. The Karnataka Lokayukta (KLA), a public complaints agency in Karnataka state (India), was created in 1986 but played a prominent role controlling systemic corruption only after a change of leadership in 2001 with a new Lokayukta (ombudsman) and Vigilance Director for Health (VDH). This case study of the KLA (2001-06) analysed the:Scope and level of poor governance in the health sector; KLA objectives and its strategy; Factors which affected public health sector governance and the operation of the KLA. We used a participatory and opportunistic evaluation design, examined documents about KLA activities, conducted three site visits, two key informant and 44 semi-structured interviews and used a force field model to analyse the governance findings. The Lokayukta and his VDH were both proactive and economically independent with an extended social network, technical expertise in both jurisdiction and health care, and were widely perceived to be acting for the common good. They mobilized media and the public about governance issues which were affected by factors at the individual, organizational and societal levels. Their investigations revealed systemic corruption within the public health sector at all levels as well as in public/private collaborations and the political and justice systems. However, wider contextual issues limited their effectiveness in intervening. The departure of the Lokayukta, upon completing his term, was due to a lack of continued political support for controlling corruption. Governance in the health sector is affected by positive and negative forces. A key positive factor was the combined social, cultural and symbolic capital of the two leaders which empowered them to challenge corrupt behaviour and promote good governance. Although change was possible, it was precarious and requires continuous political support to be sustained.
加强医疗卫生领域的良好治理和预防腐败是普遍面临的挑战。卡纳塔克邦 lokayukta(kla)是印度卡纳塔克邦的一个公共投诉机构,成立于 1986 年,但在 2001 年领导层更迭后,随着新的 lokayukta(监察员)和卫生监察主任(vdh)的上任,才开始在控制系统性腐败方面发挥突出作用。本案例研究以 kla(2001-06 年)为对象,分析了以下内容:卫生部门治理不善的范围和程度;kla 的目标及其战略;影响公共卫生部门治理和 kla 运作的因素。我们采用了参与式和机会主义评价设计,审查了关于 kla 活动的文件,进行了三次实地考察、两次关键知情者访谈和 44 次半结构化访谈,并采用力场模型分析治理结果。lokayukta 和他的 vdh 都积极主动,在经济上独立,拥有广泛的社会关系,在司法和医疗保健方面都有专业技术,并且被广泛认为是为了共同的利益而行动。他们调动媒体和公众关注受个人、组织和社会各级因素影响的治理问题。他们的调查揭示了公共卫生部门各级以及公共/私营部门合作以及政治和司法系统内部的系统性腐败。然而,更广泛的背景问题限制了他们有效干预的能力。lokayukta 在任期结束后离职,是因为缺乏持续的政治支持来控制腐败。卫生部门的治理受到积极和消极力量的影响。一个关键的积极因素是两位领导人的社会、文化和象征资本的结合,使他们有能力挑战腐败行为,促进良好治理。虽然变革是可能的,但它是不稳定的,需要持续的政治支持才能维持。