Suppr超能文献

通过分析性测试梯度系统预测胰腺组织密度,可在纯化前最大程度地提高胰岛自体移植/同种异体移植的胰岛回收率。

Prediction of pancreatic tissue densities by an analytical test gradient system before purification maximizes human islet recovery for islet autotransplantation/allotransplantation.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Schulze Diabetes Institute, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2011 Mar 15;91(5):508-14. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182066ecb.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Using standard density gradient (SDG) ranges for human islet purification frequently results in islet loss and transplantation of lower islet mass. Measuring the densities of islet and acinar tissue beforehand to customize the gradient range for the actual COBE 2991 cell processor (COBE) purification is likely to maximize the recovery of islets. We developed an analytical test gradient system (ATGS) for predicting pancreatic tissue densities before COBE purification to minimize islet loss during purification.

METHODS

Human islets were isolated from deceased donor (n=30) and chronic pancreatitis pancreata (n=30). Pancreatic tissue densities were measured before purification by the ATGS, and the density gradient range for islet purification in a COBE was customized based on density profiles determined by the ATGS. The efficiency of custom density gradients (CDGs) to recover high islet yield was compared with predefined SDGs.

RESULTS

Pancreatic tissue densities from autografts were significantly higher than in allograft preparations. In allograft purifications, a higher proportion of islets were recovered using ATGS-guided CDGs (85.9%±18.0%) compared with the SDG method (69.2%±27.0%; P=0.048). Acinar contamination at 60%, 70%, and 80% cumulative islet yield for allografts was significantly lower in the CDG group. In autograft purifications, more islets were recovered with CDGs (81.9%±28.0%) than SDGs (55.8%±22.8%; P=0.03). CDGs effectively reduced islet loss by minimizing islet sedimentation in the COBE bag.

CONCLUSIONS

Using ATGS-guided CDGs maximizes the islet recovery for successful transplantations by reducing acinar contamination in allograft preparations and by reducing sedimentation of islets in the COBE bag in autograft preparations.

摘要

背景

使用标准密度梯度(SDG)范围对人胰岛进行纯化通常会导致胰岛损失和移植的胰岛质量较低。在使用 COBE 2991 细胞处理器(COBE)进行纯化之前,预先测量胰岛和腺泡组织的密度,以定制实际 COBE 纯化的梯度范围,可能最大限度地提高胰岛的回收率。我们开发了一种分析测试梯度系统(ATGS),用于在 COBE 纯化之前预测胰腺组织的密度,以最大程度地减少纯化过程中胰岛的损失。

方法

从已故供体(n=30)和慢性胰腺炎胰腺(n=30)中分离出人胰岛。在纯化之前,通过 ATGS 测量胰腺组织的密度,并根据 ATGS 确定的密度曲线为 COBE 中的胰岛纯化定制密度梯度范围。比较定制密度梯度(CDG)回收高胰岛产量的效率与预定义的 SDG。

结果

来自自体移植物的胰腺组织密度明显高于同种异体移植物的制备物。在同种异体纯化中,与 SDG 方法(69.2%±27.0%;P=0.048)相比,使用 ATGS 指导的 CDG 可回收更多的胰岛(85.9%±18.0%)。同种异体移植物在 60%、70%和 80%累积胰岛产量时,CDG 组的胰岛污染明显较低。在自体移植物纯化中,CDG 组(81.9%±28.0%)比 SDG 组(55.8%±22.8%;P=0.03)回收的胰岛更多。CDG 通过最大限度地减少 COBE 袋中胰岛的沉降,有效地减少胰岛的损失。

结论

使用 ATGS 指导的 CDG 通过减少同种异体移植物制备物中的腺泡污染,并减少自体移植物制备物中 COBE 袋中胰岛的沉降,最大限度地提高胰岛的回收率,从而实现成功的移植。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验