Suppr超能文献

一种仅利用噪声响应来测定数字射线照相系统二维调制传递函数的方法。

A method for the determination of the two-dimensional MTF of digital radiography systems using only the noise response.

作者信息

Kuhls-Gilcrist Andrew, Bednarek Daniel R, Rudin Stephen

机构信息

University at Buffalo (State University of New York), Toshiba Stroke Research Center, 3435 Main St., Buffalo, NY USA 14214.

出版信息

Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2010 Mar 23;7622(76224W):76224W-76244W9. doi: 10.1117/12.843918.

Abstract

We present a new method that enables the determination of the two-dimensional MTF of digital radiography systems using the noise response measured from flat-field images. Unlike commonly-used methods that measure the one-dimensional MTF, this new method does not require precision-made test-objects (slits/edges) or precise tool alignment. Although standard methods are dependent upon data processing that can result in inaccuracies and inconsistencies, this method based on the intrinsic noise response of the imager is highly accurate and less susceptible to such problems. A cascaded-linear-systems analysis was used to derive an exact relationship between the noise power spectrum (NPS) and the presampled MTF of a generalized detector system. The NPS was then used to determine the two-dimensional MTF for three systems: a simulated detector in which the "true" MTF was known exactly, a commercial indirect flat-panel detector (FPD), and a new solid-state x-ray image intensifier (SSXII). For the simulated detector, excellent agreement was observed between the "true" MTF and that determined using the noise response method, with an averaged deviation of 0.3%. The FPD MTF was shown to increase on the diagonals and was measured at 2.5 cycles/mm to be 0.086±0.007, 0.12±0.01, and 0.087±0.007 at 0, 45, and 90°, respectively. No statistically significant variation was observed for the SSXII as a function of angle. Measuring the two-dimensional MTF should lead to more accurate characterization of the detector resolution response, incorporating any potential non-isotropy which may result from the physical characteristics of the sensor, including the active-area shape of the pixel array.

摘要

我们提出了一种新方法,该方法能够利用从平板场图像测量得到的噪声响应来确定数字射线照相系统的二维调制传递函数(MTF)。与常用的测量一维MTF的方法不同,这种新方法不需要精密制作的测试物体(狭缝/边缘)或精确的工具对准。尽管标准方法依赖于可能导致不准确和不一致的数据处理,但这种基于成像器固有噪声响应的方法非常准确,并且不易受此类问题的影响。使用级联线性系统分析来推导广义探测器系统的噪声功率谱(NPS)与预采样MTF之间的精确关系。然后,利用NPS确定了三个系统的二维MTF:一个“真实”MTF已知的模拟探测器、一个商用间接平板探测器(FPD)和一个新型固态X射线图像增强器(SSXII)。对于模拟探测器,在“真实”MTF与使用噪声响应方法确定的MTF之间观察到了极好的一致性,平均偏差为0.3%。FPD的MTF在对角线上有所增加,在2.5周期/毫米处,在0°、45°和90°时分别测量为0.086±0.007、0.12±0.01和0.087±0.007。未观察到SSXII的MTF随角度有统计学上的显著变化。测量二维MTF应能更准确地表征探测器的分辨率响应,同时考虑到任何可能由传感器物理特性导致的潜在各向异性,包括像素阵列的有效区域形状。

相似文献

1
A method for the determination of the two-dimensional MTF of digital radiography systems using only the noise response.
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2010 Mar 23;7622(76224W):76224W-76244W9. doi: 10.1117/12.843918.
2
Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
Med Phys. 2010 Feb;37(2):724-35. doi: 10.1118/1.3284376.
3
Measuring the presampled MTF from a reduced number of flat-field images using the Noise Response (NR) method.
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2011 Mar 1;7961(79614G). doi: 10.1117/12.877890.
5
[Comparison of noise characteristics of direct and indirect conversion flat panel detectors].
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2010 Nov 20;66(11):1443-8. doi: 10.6009/jjrt.66.1443.
6
Technical assessment of 2D and 3D imaging performance of an IGZO-based flat-panel X-ray detector.
Med Phys. 2022 May;49(5):3053-3066. doi: 10.1002/mp.15605. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
7
Nonstationary model of oblique x-ray incidence in amorphous selenium detectors: II. Transfer functions.
Med Phys. 2019 Feb;46(2):505-516. doi: 10.1002/mp.13312. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
9
Characterization and potential applications of a dual-layer flat-panel detector.
Med Phys. 2020 Aug;47(8):3332-3343. doi: 10.1002/mp.14211. Epub 2020 May 18.
10
Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
Med Phys. 2005 Jun;32(6):1684-95. doi: 10.1118/1.1921667.

引用本文的文献

2
Performance Trade-Off Analysis Comparing Different Front-End Configurations for a Digital X-ray Imager.
IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997). 2010 Oct 30;2010:2491-2494. doi: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2010.5874235.
3
Measuring the presampled MTF from a reduced number of flat-field images using the Noise Response (NR) method.
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2011 Mar 1;7961(79614G). doi: 10.1117/12.877890.
4
The Solid State X-ray Image Intensifier (SSXII) in Single Photon Counting (SPC) mode.
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2010 Mar 22;7622(76221P). doi: 10.1117/12.843785.

本文引用的文献

2
Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.
Med Phys. 2010 Feb;37(2):724-35. doi: 10.1118/1.3284376.
4
Normalization of the modulation transfer function: the open-field approach.
Med Phys. 2008 Oct;35(10):4443-9. doi: 10.1118/1.2977536.
5
The Solid-State X-Ray Image Intensifier (SSXII): An EMCCD-Based X-Ray Detector.
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2008;6913:69130K. doi: 10.1117/12.772724.
7
A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography.
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1992;11(1):34-9. doi: 10.1109/42.126908.
10
Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control.
Med Phys. 2005 Jun;32(6):1684-95. doi: 10.1118/1.1921667.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验