Kuhls-Gilcrist Andrew, Bednarek Daniel R, Rudin Stephen
University at Buffalo (State University of New York), Toshiba Stroke Research Center, 3435 Main St., Buffalo, NY USA 14214.
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2010 Mar 23;7622(76224W):76224W-76244W9. doi: 10.1117/12.843918.
We present a new method that enables the determination of the two-dimensional MTF of digital radiography systems using the noise response measured from flat-field images. Unlike commonly-used methods that measure the one-dimensional MTF, this new method does not require precision-made test-objects (slits/edges) or precise tool alignment. Although standard methods are dependent upon data processing that can result in inaccuracies and inconsistencies, this method based on the intrinsic noise response of the imager is highly accurate and less susceptible to such problems. A cascaded-linear-systems analysis was used to derive an exact relationship between the noise power spectrum (NPS) and the presampled MTF of a generalized detector system. The NPS was then used to determine the two-dimensional MTF for three systems: a simulated detector in which the "true" MTF was known exactly, a commercial indirect flat-panel detector (FPD), and a new solid-state x-ray image intensifier (SSXII). For the simulated detector, excellent agreement was observed between the "true" MTF and that determined using the noise response method, with an averaged deviation of 0.3%. The FPD MTF was shown to increase on the diagonals and was measured at 2.5 cycles/mm to be 0.086±0.007, 0.12±0.01, and 0.087±0.007 at 0, 45, and 90°, respectively. No statistically significant variation was observed for the SSXII as a function of angle. Measuring the two-dimensional MTF should lead to more accurate characterization of the detector resolution response, incorporating any potential non-isotropy which may result from the physical characteristics of the sensor, including the active-area shape of the pixel array.
我们提出了一种新方法,该方法能够利用从平板场图像测量得到的噪声响应来确定数字射线照相系统的二维调制传递函数(MTF)。与常用的测量一维MTF的方法不同,这种新方法不需要精密制作的测试物体(狭缝/边缘)或精确的工具对准。尽管标准方法依赖于可能导致不准确和不一致的数据处理,但这种基于成像器固有噪声响应的方法非常准确,并且不易受此类问题的影响。使用级联线性系统分析来推导广义探测器系统的噪声功率谱(NPS)与预采样MTF之间的精确关系。然后,利用NPS确定了三个系统的二维MTF:一个“真实”MTF已知的模拟探测器、一个商用间接平板探测器(FPD)和一个新型固态X射线图像增强器(SSXII)。对于模拟探测器,在“真实”MTF与使用噪声响应方法确定的MTF之间观察到了极好的一致性,平均偏差为0.3%。FPD的MTF在对角线上有所增加,在2.5周期/毫米处,在0°、45°和90°时分别测量为0.086±0.007、0.12±0.01和0.087±0.007。未观察到SSXII的MTF随角度有统计学上的显著变化。测量二维MTF应能更准确地表征探测器的分辨率响应,同时考虑到任何可能由传感器物理特性导致的潜在各向异性,包括像素阵列的有效区域形状。