• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

损伤控制剖腹术的长期影响:一项前瞻性研究。

Long-term impact of damage control laparotomy: a prospective study.

作者信息

Brenner Megan, Bochicchio Grant, Bochicchio Kelly, Ilahi Obeid, Rodriguez Eduardo, Henry Sharon, Joshi Manjari, Scalea Thomas

机构信息

R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 2011 Apr;146(4):395-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.284. Epub 2010 Dec 20.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.2010.284
PMID:21173282
Abstract

HYPOTHESIS

Damage control laparotomy (DCL) has beneficial effects on the long-term morbidity and survival of trauma patients.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

PATIENTS

Eighty-eight trauma patients who were admitted during a 3-year period (January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2003) underwent damage control laparotomy and were subsequently followed up (January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2008).

INTERVENTION

Damage control laparotomy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Major and long-term complications, lengths of stay, mortality, readmissions, subsequent surgical procedures, activities of daily living, and return to work.

RESULTS

On admission, the mean age and Injury Severity Score were 33 years and 34, respectively. Of the 88 patients, 66 (75%) were male; 46 patients had blunt injuries and 42 had penetrating injuries. Liver was the most common injury (63 patients), followed by bowel (34), spleen (33), major vessel (19), and pancreas (10). The mean admission pH and temperature were 7.19 and 34.4°C, respectively, with 21.5 U of packed red blood cells transfused. The mean (SD) number of initial abdominal operations was 4.6 (2.5) per patient, with an overall mortality of 28% (25 patients). Intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were 18 (15) and 32 (20) days, respectively. Of the 63 patients who survived, 58 underwent intra-abdominal closure with polyglactin mesh. During the study, 44 intra-abdominal infections and 18 enterocutaneous fistulas were diagnosed. All 63 survivors were readmitted at least once. There were a total of 186 readmissions and 92 subsequent surgical procedures. Ventral hernia repair (66 readmissions) was the most common reason for readmission, followed by infection (41) and fistula management (29). There was 0% mortality for patients who survived the preliminary hospitalization. Of the 63 surviving patients, 51 (81%) reported that they had gone back to work and resumed normal daily activities.

CONCLUSION

Although damage control laparotomy is associated with a significant complication and readmission rate, its overall benefit is indisputable.

摘要

假设

损伤控制剖腹术(DCL)对创伤患者的长期发病率和生存率有有益影响。

设计

前瞻性研究。

地点

一级创伤中心。

患者

88例创伤患者在3年期间(2000年1月1日至2003年12月31日)接受了损伤控制剖腹术,并随后进行了随访(2001年1月1日至2008年12月31日)。

干预措施

损伤控制剖腹术。

主要观察指标

主要和长期并发症、住院时间、死亡率、再入院率、后续手术、日常生活活动能力及恢复工作情况。

结果

入院时,平均年龄和损伤严重度评分分别为33岁和34分。88例患者中,66例(75%)为男性;46例为钝性伤,42例为穿透伤。肝脏是最常见的损伤部位(63例患者),其次是肠道(34例)、脾脏(33例)、大血管(19例)和胰腺(10例)。入院时平均pH值和体温分别为7.19和34.4°C,输注浓缩红细胞21.5单位。每位患者初始腹部手术的平均(标准差)次数为4.6(2.5)次,总死亡率为28%(25例患者)。重症监护病房和住院时间分别为18(15)天和32(20)天。63例存活患者中,58例采用聚乙醇酸网片进行腹腔关闭。研究期间,诊断出44例腹腔感染和18例肠皮肤瘘。所有63例幸存者均至少再次入院一次。总共186次再入院和92次后续手术。腹疝修补术(66次再入院)是再入院最常见的原因,其次是感染(41次)和瘘管处理(29次)。初步住院存活的患者死亡率为0%。63例存活患者中,51例(81%)报告已恢复工作并恢复正常日常活动。

结论

虽然损伤控制剖腹术与显著的并发症和再入院率相关,但其总体益处是无可争议的。

相似文献

1
Long-term impact of damage control laparotomy: a prospective study.损伤控制剖腹术的长期影响:一项前瞻性研究。
Arch Surg. 2011 Apr;146(4):395-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.284. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
2
Long term impact of damage control surgery: a preliminary prospective study.
J Trauma. 2006 Oct;61(4):831-4; discussion 835-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000239504.35149.c5.
3
Damage control resuscitation in combination with damage control laparotomy: a survival advantage.损伤控制复苏联合损伤控制剖腹术:生存优势
J Trauma. 2010 Jul;69(1):46-52. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181df91fa.
4
Hemodynamically "stable" patients with peritonitis after penetrating abdominal trauma: identifying those who are bleeding.穿透性腹部创伤后血流动力学“稳定”的腹膜炎患者:识别那些正在出血的患者。
Arch Surg. 2005 Aug;140(8):767-72. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.8.767.
5
Contemporary damage control surgery outcomes: 80 patients with severe abdominal injuries in the right upper quadrant analyzed.当代损伤控制手术的结果:对80例右上腹严重腹部损伤患者进行了分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018 Feb;44(1):79-85. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0768-8. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
6
Changing patterns in the management of penetrating abdominal trauma: the more things change, the more they stay the same.穿透性腹部创伤管理模式的变化:万变不离其宗。
J Trauma. 2003 Dec;55(6):1095-108; discussion 1108-10. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000101067.52018.42.
7
Urgent and emergent re-laparotomy in trauma. A preventable cause of increased mortality?创伤中的紧急和急诊再次剖腹手术。是死亡率增加的一个可预防原因吗?
Am Surg. 1986 Jun;52(6):308-11.
8
[Outcome of primary surgical management of liver trauma].[肝外伤一期手术治疗的结果]
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1997;114:1247-8.
9
Management of liver injuries in Paholpolpayuhasena Hospital.帕霍尔波尔帕尤哈塞纳医院肝脏损伤的管理
J Med Assoc Thai. 2003 Feb;86(2):103-10.
10
Not all intestinal traumatic injuries are the same: a comparison of surgically treated blunt vs. penetrating injuries.并非所有肠道创伤性损伤都相同:手术治疗钝性伤与穿透伤的比较。
Injury. 2015 Jan;46(1):115-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Severe Abdominal Trauma: A Secondary Analysis of the Damage Control Laparotomy Trial.严重腹部创伤后的患者报告结局:损伤控制剖腹术试验的二次分析
J Surg Res. 2024 Jan;293:57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.06.042. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
2
Variation in use of damage control laparotomy for trauma by trauma centers in the United States, Canada, and Australasia.美国、加拿大和澳大拉西亚创伤中心创伤患者使用损伤控制性剖腹术的差异。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Oct 14;16(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00396-7.
3
Six-year national study of damage control laparotomy and the effect of repeat re-exploration on rate of infectious complications.
为期六年的损伤控制剖腹术及再次剖腹探查对感染并发症发生率影响的全国性研究。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 Jun 15;6(1):e000706. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000706. eCollection 2021.
4
Evidence for use of damage control surgery and damage control interventions in civilian trauma patients: a systematic review.民用创伤患者使用损伤控制性手术和损伤控制性干预的证据:系统评价。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Mar 11;16(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00352-5.
5
Application of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy with Instillation and Dwell Time of the Open Abdomen: Initial Experience.开放腹腔负压伤口治疗联合滴注与停留时间的应用:初步经验
Cureus. 2019 Sep 16;11(9):e5667. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5667.
6
Open abdomen critical care management principles: resuscitation, fluid balance, nutrition, and ventilator management.开放性腹腔的重症监护管理原则:复苏、液体平衡、营养及呼吸机管理。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Sep 3;2(1):e000063. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2016-000063. eCollection 2017.
7
Mortality in trauma patients with active arterial bleeding managed by embolization or surgical packing: An observational cohort study of 66 patients.经栓塞或手术填塞治疗的活动性动脉出血创伤患者的死亡率:一项对66例患者的观察性队列研究。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):107-14. doi: 10.4103/0974-2700.185274.
8
Maxillofacial and neck trauma: a damage control approach.颌面及颈部创伤:损伤控制方法
World J Emerg Surg. 2015 Jul 7;10:31. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0022-9. eCollection 2015.
9
Planned ventral hernia following damage control laparotomy in trauma: an added year of recovery but equal long-term outcome.创伤损伤控制剖腹术后计划性腹疝:恢复时间增加一年,但长期结局相同。
Hernia. 2016 Apr;20(2):231-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1377-2. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
10
Complications after laparotomy for trauma: a retrospective analysis in a level I trauma centre.创伤剖腹术后并发症:I级创伤中心的回顾性分析
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Jan;400(1):83-90. doi: 10.1007/s00423-014-1260-0. Epub 2014 Dec 23.