Clinical Research Center for Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders, Kanto Rosai Hospital, 1-1 Kizukisumiyoshicho, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki 211-8510, Japan.
Ind Health. 2011;49(2):203-8. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.ms1193. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
To assess the effects of physician's advice on non-specific acute low back pain (ALBP) in Japanese workers, existing data from a prospective, epidemiological study of Japanese workers were analyzed. Among workers who had had low back strain during the past year at baseline and responded to the 1-yr follow-up survey (n=475), those who obtained medical care (n=255) and received advice either to rest (n=68 for the rest group) or to stay active (n=32 for the active group) were examined. The rest group seemed to have a higher risk of ALBP than the active group after adjusting for age, gender, history of low back strain, type of physical activity at work, and severity of LBP during the past month at baseline (adjusted OR for the rest group vs. the active group: 3.65, 95%CI: 0.96-13.8). Compared to the active group, low back strain was more likely to occur repeatedly and to become chronic in the rest group. These findings suggest that advice to rest may not be better than advice to stay active for preventing future episodes of ALBP in Japanese workers, which is consistent with previous studies or guidelines for the management of ALBP in Western countries.
为了评估医生对日本工人非特异性急性下腰痛(ALBP)的建议的影响,对一项日本工人前瞻性、流行病学研究的现有数据进行了分析。在基线时有过下背部拉伤且对 1 年随访调查做出回应的工人中(n=475),那些获得医疗护理(n=255)并接受了休息(n=68 名休息组)或保持活动(n=32 名活动组)建议的工人被纳入研究。在调整了年龄、性别、低背拉伤史、工作时体力活动类型以及基线时过去一个月的 LBP 严重程度等因素后,休息组似乎比活动组有更高的 ALBP 风险(休息组与活动组的调整比值比:3.65,95%CI:0.96-13.8)。与活动组相比,休息组的下背部拉伤更有可能反复发生,并发展为慢性。这些发现表明,在日本工人中,休息建议可能不如保持活动建议能预防未来的 ALBP 发作,这与西方国家的 ALBP 管理的先前研究或指南一致。