• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦农村地区积极社区治疗(ACT)的临床结果:一项为期2年随访的病例对照研究。

Clinical outcome of assertive community treatment (ACT) in a rural area in Denmark: a case-control study with a 2-year follow-up.

作者信息

Aagaard Jørgen, Müller-Nielsen Klaus

机构信息

Community Mental Health Centre, Tønder & Augustenborg Hospital, Augustenborg, Denmark.

出版信息

Nord J Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;65(5):299-305. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2010.544405. Epub 2010 Dec 21.

DOI:10.3109/08039488.2010.544405
PMID:21174491
Abstract

AIM

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of assertive community treatment (ACT) in the Tønder Region, South Jutland, where the first Danish ACT team was established to treat patients with severe and persistent mental illness (SMI).

METHODS

The study compares outcome over a 2-year period between recipients of ACT and standard community mental healthcare.

RESULTS

The study included 86 cases and 88 controls. At the time of recruitment, the cases and the controls did not differ significantly in demographic details and eligibility criteria. At the 2-year follow-up, the ACT patients showed a significant reduction in admissions, bed days and day hospital days, and a significant increase in the number of consultations compared with the controls. Adherence to outpatient services was higher in the ACT group. No significant improvements in psychopathology were found after 2 years, but a significant improvement in met needs and fewer unmet needs, indicating better functioning, occurred. Clients' satisfaction with care (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, CSQ) was significantly higher among ACT patients than among controls.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of these patients in this ACT service has yielded promising results, suggesting that ACT treatment may be a useful intervention for SMI patients. However, large, rigorous, randomized control trials with ACT are needed in Europe as the existing evidence mainly comes from American studies.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估丹麦首个积极社区治疗(ACT)团队所在的南日德兰半岛托嫩地区积极社区治疗对重度持续性精神疾病(SMI)患者的治疗效果。

方法

本研究比较了ACT接受者与标准社区精神卫生保健接受者在两年期间的治疗结果。

结果

该研究纳入了86例病例和88例对照。在招募时,病例组和对照组在人口统计学细节和入选标准方面没有显著差异。在2年的随访中,与对照组相比,接受ACT治疗的患者住院次数、住院天数和日间医院就诊天数显著减少,会诊次数显著增加。ACT组对门诊服务的依从性更高。2年后未发现精神病理学有显著改善,但满足需求方面有显著改善,未满足的需求减少,表明功能有所改善。ACT患者对护理的满意度(患者满意度问卷,CSQ)显著高于对照组。

结论

在这项ACT服务中对这些患者的治疗取得了有希望的结果,表明ACT治疗可能是对SMI患者有用的干预措施。然而,欧洲需要开展大规模、严格的ACT随机对照试验,因为现有证据主要来自美国的研究。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcome of assertive community treatment (ACT) in a rural area in Denmark: a case-control study with a 2-year follow-up.丹麦农村地区积极社区治疗(ACT)的临床结果:一项为期2年随访的病例对照研究。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;65(5):299-305. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2010.544405. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
2
Predictors of Clinical Outcome of Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) in a Rural Area in Denmark: An Observational Study with a Two-Year Follow-Up.丹麦农村地区积极社区治疗(ACT)临床结局的预测因素:一项为期两年随访的观察性研究
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov;52(8):908-913. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9908-y. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
3
Costs and outcome of assertive community treatment (ACT) in a rural area in Denmark: 4-year register-based follow-up.丹麦农村地区积极社区治疗(ACT)的成本与结果:基于登记册的4年随访
Nord J Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;69(2):110-7. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2014.936500. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
4
Assertive community treatment versus standard treatment for severely mentally ill patients in Denmark: a quasi-experimental trial.丹麦针对重症精神病患者的积极社区治疗与标准治疗对比:一项准实验性试验。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;73(2):149-158. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1576765. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
5
Assertive community treatment (ACT) case managers' professional identities: A focus group study.坚定的社区治疗(ACT)个案经理的专业身份:一个焦点小组研究。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Dec;25(6):579-587. doi: 10.1111/inm.12211. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
6
Does Assertive Community Treatment Reduce the Use of Compulsory Admissions?积极社区治疗能否减少强制入院的使用?
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017 Dec;31(6):641-646. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
7
The effect of flexible assertive community treatment in Denmark: a quasi-experimental controlled study.丹麦灵活坚定社区治疗的效果:一项准实验对照研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;8(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30424-7. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
8
Outcomes of clients in need of intensive team care in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment in Sweden.瑞典灵活积极社区治疗中需要强化团队护理的客户的治疗结果。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;72(3):226-231. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2018.1430168. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
9
Patient Outcomes of Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Compared With Assertive Community Treatment.与积极社区治疗相比,灵活积极社区治疗的患者结局
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Jul 1;74(7):695-701. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220235. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
10
Effectiveness of integrated care including therapeutic assertive community treatment in severe schizophrenia-spectrum and bipolar I disorders: Four-year follow-up of the ACCESS II study.综合护理(包括治疗性积极社区治疗)对重度精神分裂症谱系障碍和双相I型障碍的有效性:ACCESS II研究的四年随访
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 27;13(2):e0192929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192929. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a flexible assertive community treatment (FACT) program for patients with severe mental illness: an observational study in Salzburg, Austria.针对重度精神疾病患者的灵活主动社区治疗(FACT)项目评估:奥地利萨尔茨堡的一项观察性研究
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2024 Feb 9;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13033-024-00628-8.
2
Improved patient-reported outcomes after interprofessional training in mental health: a nonrandomized intervention study.跨专业精神健康培训后患者报告结局的改善:一项非随机干预研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 May 14;20(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02616-x.
3
Assertive Community Programs for Patients with Severe Mental Disorders: Are Benefits Sustained After Discharge?
《针对严重精神障碍患者的自信社区计划:出院后是否能持续获益?》
Community Ment Health J. 2020 Apr;56(3):559-567. doi: 10.1007/s10597-019-00513-6. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
4
Receipt and targeting of evidence-based psychosocial interventions for people living with psychoses: findings from the second Australian national survey of psychosis.基于证据的心理社会干预措施在精神病患者中的接受和实施情况:来自第二次澳大利亚全国精神病学调查的结果。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Dec;28(6):613-629. doi: 10.1017/S2045796018000288. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
5
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an integrated care program for schizophrenia: an analysis of routine data.精神分裂症综合护理计划的有效性和成本效益:基于常规数据的分析。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018 Sep;268(6):611-619. doi: 10.1007/s00406-017-0830-x. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
6
Are Users Satisfied with Assertive Community Treatment in Spite of Personal Restrictions?尽管存在个人限制,服务对象对积极社区治疗是否满意?
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov;52(8):891-897. doi: 10.1007/s10597-016-9994-5. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
7
Predictors of Clinical Outcome of Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) in a Rural Area in Denmark: An Observational Study with a Two-Year Follow-Up.丹麦农村地区积极社区治疗(ACT)临床结局的预测因素:一项为期两年随访的观察性研究
Community Ment Health J. 2016 Nov;52(8):908-913. doi: 10.1007/s10597-015-9908-y. Epub 2015 Jul 5.
8
The prevalence and geographic distribution of complex co-occurring disorders: a population study.复杂共病的流行状况和地域分布:一项人群研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016 Jun;25(3):267-77. doi: 10.1017/S2045796015000347. Epub 2015 May 20.
9
Approaches to improve adherence to pharmacotherapy in patients with schizophrenia.提高精神分裂症患者药物治疗依从性的方法。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 May 14;8:701-14. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S59371. eCollection 2014.
10
Schizophrenia--time to commit to policy change.精神分裂症——是时候做出政策改变了。
Schizophr Bull. 2014 Apr;40 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S165-94. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu006.