Schöttle Daniel, Schimmelmann Benno G, Ruppelt Friederike, Bussopulos Alexandra, Frieling Marietta, Nika Evangelia, Nawara Luise Antonia, Golks Dietmar, Kerstan Andrea, Lange Matthias, Schödlbauer Michael, Daubmann Anne, Wegscheider Karl, Rohenkohl Anja, Sarikaya Gizem, Sengutta Mary, Luedecke Daniel, Wittmann Linus, Ohm Gunda, Meigel-Schleiff Christina, Gallinat Jürgen, Wiedemann Klaus, Bock Thomas, Karow Anne, Lambert Martin
Psychosis Centre, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Centre of Psychosocial Medicine, Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
University Hospital of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 27;13(2):e0192929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192929. eCollection 2018.
The ACCESS-model offers integrated care including assertive community treatment to patients with psychotic disorders. ACCESS proved more effective compared to standard care (ACCESS-I study) and was successfully implemented into clinical routine (ACCESS-II study). In this article, we report the 4-year outcomes of the ACCESS-II study. Between May 2007 and December 2013, 115 patients received continuous ACCESS-care. We hypothesized that the low 2-year disengagement and hospitalization rates and significant improvements in psychopathology, functioning, and quality of life could be sustained over 4 years. Over 4 years, only 10 patients disengaged from ACCESS. Another 23 left for practical reasons and were successfully transferred to other services. Hospitalization rates remained low (13.0% in year 3; 9.1% in year 4). Involuntary admissions decreased from 35% in the 2 years prior to ACCESS to 8% over 4 years in ACCESS. Outpatient contacts remained stably high at 2.0-2.4 per week. We detected significant improvements in psychopathology (effect size d = 0.79), illness severity (d = 1.29), level of functioning (d = 0.77), quality of life (d = 0.47) and stably high client satisfaction (d = 0.02) over 4 years. Most positive effects were observed within the first 2 years with the exception of illness severity, which further improved from year 2 to 4. Within continuous intensive 4-year ACCESS-care, sustained improvements in psychopathology, functioning, quality of life, low service disengagement and re-hospitalization rates, as well as low rates of involuntary treatment, were observed in contrast to other studies, which reported a decline in these parameters once a specific treatment model was stopped. Yet, stronger evidence to prove these results is required.
Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT01888627.
ACCESS模式为患有精神疾病的患者提供综合护理,包括积极社区治疗。与标准护理相比,ACCESS模式被证明更有效(ACCESS-I研究),并已成功应用于临床常规治疗(ACCESS-II研究)。在本文中,我们报告了ACCESS-II研究的4年结果。2007年5月至2013年12月期间,115名患者接受了持续的ACCESS护理。我们假设,较低的2年脱离率和住院率以及精神病理学、功能和生活质量的显著改善在4年内可以持续。在4年期间,只有10名患者脱离了ACCESS护理。另外23名患者因实际原因离开,并成功转至其他服务机构。住院率仍然较低(第3年为13.0%;第4年为9.1%)。非自愿住院率从接受ACCESS护理前2年的35%降至4年期间的8%。门诊就诊次数稳定保持在每周2.0 - 2.4次。我们发现,在4年期间,精神病理学(效应量d = 0.79)、疾病严重程度(d = 1.29)、功能水平(d = 0.77)、生活质量(d = 0.47)有显著改善,患者满意度稳定保持在较高水平(d = 0.02)。除疾病严重程度从第2年到第4年进一步改善外,大多数积极效果在头2年内观察到。与其他研究不同,在持续4年的强化ACCESS护理中,观察到精神病理学、功能、生活质量持续改善,服务脱离率和再住院率较低,非自愿治疗率也较低;其他研究报告称,一旦特定治疗模式停止,这些参数会下降。然而,需要更有力的证据来证明这些结果。
临床试验注册号:NCT01888627