• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临时固定局部义齿的断裂强度:CAD/CAM 与直接制作修复体的比较。

Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations.

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Justus-Liebig-University, D-35392 Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Dent Mater. 2011 Apr;27(4):339-47. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.012. Epub 2010 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.012
PMID:21176946
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed at investigating the influence of fabrication method, storage condition and material on the fracture strength of temporary 3-unit fixed partial dentures (FPDs).

METHODS

A CrCo-alloy master model with a 3-unit FPD (abutment teeth 25 and 27) was manufactured. The master model was scanned and the data set transferred to a CAD/CAM unit (Cercon Brain Expert, Degudent, Hanau, Germany). Temporary 3-unit bridges were produced either by milling from pre-fabricated blanks (Trim, Luxatemp AM Plus, Cercon Base PMMA) or by direct fabrication (Trim, Luxatemp AM Plus). 10 FPDs per experimental group were subjected either to water storage at 37 °C for 24h and 3 months, respectively, or thermocycled (TC, 5000×, 5-55 °C, 1 week). Maximum force at fracture (Fmax) was determined in a 3-point bending test at 200 mm/min. Data was analyzed using parametric statistics (α = 5%).

RESULTS

Fmax values ranged from 138.5 to 1115.5N. FPDs, which were CAD/CAM fabricated, showed a significant higher Fmax compared to the directly fabricated bridges (p < 0.05). TC significantly affected Fmax for Luxatemp (p < 0.05) but not for the PMMA based materials (p > 0.05). CAD/CAM milled FPDs made of Luxatemp showed significantly higher Fmax values compared to Trim and Cercon Base PMMA (p < 0.05).

SIGNIFICANCE

CAD/CAM fabricated FPDs exhibit a higher mechanical strength compared to directly fabricated FPDs, when manufactured of the same material. Composite based materials seem to offer clear advantages versus PMMA based materials and should, therefore, be considered for CAD/CAM fabricated temporary restorations.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨制作方法、储存条件和材料对临时三单位固定局部义齿(FPD)断裂强度的影响。

方法

制作带有三单位 FPD(基牙 25 和 27)的 CrCo 合金母模。扫描母模并将数据集传输到 CAD/CAM 单元(德国 Degudent 的 Cercon Brain Expert)。临时三单位桥通过从预制毛坯(Trim、Luxatemp AM Plus、Cercon Base PMMA)铣削或直接制作(Trim、Luxatemp AM Plus)来制作。每个实验组有 10 个 FPD,分别在 37°C 下储存 24 小时和 3 个月,或进行热循环(TC,5000×,5-55°C,1 周)。在 200mm/min 的三点弯曲试验中测定断裂时的最大力(Fmax)。使用参数统计(α=5%)分析数据。

结果

Fmax 值范围为 138.5 至 1115.5N。与直接制作的桥相比,CAD/CAM 制作的 FPD 显示出显著更高的 Fmax(p<0.05)。TC 显著影响 Luxatemp 的 Fmax(p<0.05),但不影响基于 PMMA 的材料(p>0.05)。与 Trim 和 Cercon Base PMMA 相比,CAD/CAM 铣削的 Luxatemp 基 FPD 显示出显著更高的 Fmax 值(p<0.05)。

意义

当使用相同的材料制造时,CAD/CAM 制作的 FPD 比直接制作的 FPD 具有更高的机械强度。基于复合材料的材料似乎比基于 PMMA 的材料具有明显优势,因此应考虑用于 CAD/CAM 制作的临时修复体。

相似文献

1
Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations.临时固定局部义齿的断裂强度:CAD/CAM 与直接制作修复体的比较。
Dent Mater. 2011 Apr;27(4):339-47. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.012. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
2
Fracture toughness of cross-linked and non-cross-linked temporary crown and fixed partial denture materials.交联和非交联临时冠及固定局部义齿材料的断裂韧性。
Dent Mater. 2009 Jul;25(7):917-28. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.099. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
3
Fracture resistance of PMMA and resin matrix composite-based interim FPD materials.聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)和树脂基质复合材料基临时固定局部义齿材料的抗折性
Int J Prosthodont. 2003 Jul-Aug;16(4):381-4.
4
Comparative study of interim materials for direct fixed dental prostheses and their fabrication with CAD/CAM technique.直接固定义齿临时材料及其CAD/CAM技术制作的对比研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Aug;114(2):248-53. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.023. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
5
Fracture strength of fiber-reinforced surface-retained anterior cantilever restorations.纤维增强表面固位前牙悬臂修复体的断裂强度
Int J Prosthodont. 2008 May-Jun;21(3):228-32.
6
Load bearing capacity of fiber-reinforced and unreinforced composite resin CAD/CAM-fabricated fixed dental prostheses.纤维增强和未增强复合树脂 CAD/CAM 制作的固定义齿的承载能力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Feb;109(2):88-94. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60022-0.
7
In vitro fracture resistance of four-unit fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures.四单位纤维增强复合固定局部义齿的体外抗折性
Dent Mater. 2006 Apr;22(4):374-81. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.040. Epub 2005 Sep 6.
8
Fracture load of milled polymeric fixed dental prostheses as a function of connector cross-sectional areas.铣削聚合体固定义齿的断裂负荷与连接体截面积的关系。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Oct;110(4):288-95. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60378-9.
9
Flexural properties of prosthetic provisional polymers.义齿临时聚合物的弯曲性能。
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2004 Jun;12(2):75-9.
10
Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.使用钛基与定制氧化锆种植体基台的牙-牙和种植体-牙支持的全瓷固定局部义齿的断裂力
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Oct;19(10):1049-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01551.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of fracture resistance force of three different posterior aesthetic crowns and occlusal wear of antagonist primary teeth - An study.三种不同后牙美学冠的抗折力及对颌乳牙咬合磨损的比较评估——一项研究
J Clin Exp Dent. 2025 May 1;17(5):e528-e534. doi: 10.4317/jced.62730. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Comparison of Fracture Resistance of Three-Unit Interim Restorations Fabricated by the CAD-CAM Technology With Two Different Milling Machines and the Direct Technique by Using Different Materials.使用两种不同铣床通过CAD-CAM技术制作的三单位临时修复体与使用不同材料的直接技术的抗折性比较。
Scientifica (Cairo). 2025 May 25;2025:1608702. doi: 10.1155/sci5/1608702. eCollection 2025.
3
A Comparative In Vitro Study of Materials for Provisional Restorations Manufactured With Additive (3Dprinting), Subtractive (Milling), and Conventional Techniques.
使用增材(3D打印)、减材(铣削)和传统技术制造的临时修复材料的体外比较研究。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Aug;37(8):2011-2020. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13481. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
4
Comparison of Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Interim Crowns Fabricated by Conventional, Milling and 3D Printing Methods.传统、铣削和3D打印方法制作的临时冠的颜色稳定性和表面粗糙度比较
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Apr;11(2):e70119. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70119.
5
Clinical performance of long-term temporary fixed dental prostheses fabricated from CAD/CAM resin-based composite.基于CAD/CAM树脂基复合材料制作的长期临时固定义齿的临床性能
Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Mar 12;29(4):179. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06259-8.
6
Evaluation of the marginal fit and fracture resistance of interim restorations fabricated using different techniques: an in vitro study.使用不同技术制作的临时修复体的边缘适合性和抗折性评估:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 7;25(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05679-y.
7
Trueness and Internal Fit of 3D Printed Provisional Veneers: An In Vitro Comparative Study.3D打印临时贴面的准确性和内部适合性:一项体外比较研究。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2024 Nov 28;11(12):1204. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11121204.
8
Comparison of Mechanical and Surface Properties between Conventional and CAD/CAM Provisional Restorations.传统与CAD/CAM临时修复体的机械性能和表面性能比较
Eur J Dent. 2025 Jul;19(3):697-703. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791965. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
9
Comparative Evaluation of Microbial Adhesion on Provisional Crowns Fabricated With Milled Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) and Conventional Acrylic Resin: A Prospective Clinical Trial.用铣削聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)和传统丙烯酸树脂制作的临时冠上微生物黏附的比较评估:一项前瞻性临床试验。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 13;16(7):e64469. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64469. eCollection 2024 Jul.
10
Application of Polyether Ketone in Oral Implantology and Prosthodontics.聚醚酮在口腔种植学与口腔修复学中的应用
Cureus. 2024 May 13;16(5):e60175. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60175. eCollection 2024 May.