Universidade Veiga de Almeida, Hospital Central Aristarcho Pessoa, Brazil.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Nov-Dec;76(6):687-94. doi: 10.1590/S1808-86942010000600003.
The study of high frequencies has proven its importance for detecting inner ear damage. In some cases, conventional frequencies are not sensitive enough to pick up early changes to the inner ear.
To analyze the results of threshold high frequency analysis of individuals exposed to noise with normal conventional audiometry.
This was a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study, in which we studied 47 firefighters of the Fire Department of Rio de Janeiro, based on Santos Dumont airport and 33 military men without noise exposure. They were broken down into two age groups: 30-39years and 40-49years. The high frequencies were studied immediately after conventional audiometry.
The results were most significant in the 40 to 49 years of age range, where the experimental group showed significantly higher threshold values than the control group 14000Hz (p = 0.008) and 16,000Hz (p = 0.0001).
We concluded that noise interfered with high frequency thresholds, where all the mean values found in the experimental group were higher than those in the control group. We suggest that these data reinforce the importance of studying high frequencies, even with normal conventional audiometry in the early detection of noise-induced hearing loss.
高频研究已被证明对检测内耳损伤具有重要意义。在某些情况下,常规频率不够敏感,无法及早发现内耳的变化。
分析接触噪声的个体进行高频阈值分析的结果,这些个体的常规听阈测试正常。
这是一项回顾性的横断面队列研究,我们研究了基于桑托斯·杜蒙特机场的 47 名里约热内卢消防局的消防员和 33 名无噪声暴露的军人,他们分为两个年龄组:30-39 岁和 40-49 岁。在进行常规听阈测试后立即对高频进行研究。
在 40-49 岁年龄组中,结果最为显著,实验组在 14000Hz(p=0.008)和 16000Hz(p=0.0001)的阈值明显高于对照组。
我们得出结论,噪声干扰了高频阈值,实验组的所有平均值都高于对照组。我们建议,这些数据强化了即使在常规听阈测试正常的情况下,也应研究高频,以便及早发现噪声性听力损失。