Department of Zoology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Chronobiol Int. 2011 Feb;28(1):70-5. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2010.525674.
Light masking has been studied almost exclusively in the laboratory. The authors populated four field enclosures with locally coexisting nocturnal Acomys cahirinus and diurnal A. russatus, and monitored their body temperatures (T(b)) using implanted temperature-sensitive radio transmitters. A 3-h light pulse was initiated at the beginning of two consecutive nights; preceding nights were controls. A. cahirinus T(b) and calculated activity levels decreased significantly during the light pulse, demonstrating a negative light masking response (light effect on T(b): -0.32 °C ± 0.15 °C; average calculated activity records during the light pulse: 7 ± 1.53, control: 9.8 ± 1.62). Diurnal A. russatus did not respond to the light pulse. We conclude that light masking is not an artifact of laboratory conditions but represents a natural adaptive response in free-living populations.
光照遮蔽在实验室中几乎被单独研究过。作者用植入的温度敏感无线电发射器监测了在四个野外围场内共存的夜间活动的 Acomys cahirinus 和白天活动的 A. russatus 的体温(T(b))。在两个连续的夜晚开始时启动了一个 3 小时的光脉冲;前一晚作为对照。A. cahirinus 的 T(b)和计算出的活动水平在光脉冲期间显著下降,表明存在负的光照遮蔽反应(光照对 T(b)的影响:-0.32°C±0.15°C;光脉冲期间的平均计算活动记录:7±1.53,对照:9.8±1.62)。白天活动的 A. russatus 对光脉冲没有反应。我们的结论是,光照遮蔽不是实验室条件的产物,而是自由生活种群的自然适应反应。