• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

In vitro analysis of the physical properties of contact lens blister pack solutions.

作者信息

Menzies Kara L, Jones Lyndon

机构信息

University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Apr;88(4):493-501. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ff9d39.

DOI:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ff9d39
PMID:21187803
Abstract

PURPOSE

Since the initial development of silicone hydrogels, many modifications to the bulk and surface properties of the lenses have been undertaken to improve the wettability and comfort of the lenses. Recently, manufacturers have incorporated various "wetting agents" or surface-active agents into the blister packaging solutions (BPSs) of the lenses to improve initial comfort of the lens on eye. The purpose of this study was to measure and compare the pH, surface tension (ST), viscosity, and osmolality of BPSs for a variety of silicone hydrogel and polyHEMA-based hydrogel lenses. In addition, two saline solutions were tested for comparison purposes.

METHODS

The pH, osmolality, ST, and viscosity were measured for the BPSs for lotrafilcon B and lotrafilcon A and lotrafilcon B with a "modified BPS" (m-lotrafilcon A, m-lotrafilcon B) (CIBA Vision, Duluth, GA); balafilcon A (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, NY); galyfilcon A, senofilcon A, and narafilcon A (Johnson & Johnson, Jacksonville, FL); and comfilcon A and enfilcon A (CooperVision, Pleasanton, CA) and BPSs from two conventional polyHEMA-based materials-etafilcon A (Johnson & Johnson) and omafilcon A (CooperVision). The two saline solutions tested were Unisol (Alcon, Fort Worth, TX) and Softwear Saline (CIBA Vision).

RESULTS

The pH results for the two saline solutions and all BPSs remained in the pH range of tears (6.6-7.8). The ST of the modified BPS was significantly lower (p < 0.01) than the original non-modified BPS. Viscosity measurements ranged between 0.90 and 1.00 cP for all BPSs and saline solutions, except for the modified BPS, which had significantly higher viscosities (p < 0.001). Osmolality measurements were not significantly different (p > 0.05) between BPSs made by the same manufacturer but were significantly different compared with BPSs made by different manufacturers (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The incorporation of wetting agents and surfactants into BPSs does alter the physical properties of the BPSs, which may have clinical implications regarding initial in-eye comfort.

摘要

相似文献

1
In vitro analysis of the physical properties of contact lens blister pack solutions.
Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Apr;88(4):493-501. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ff9d39.
2
In vitro contact angle analysis and physical properties of blister pack solutions of daily disposable contact lenses.一次性日戴型隐形眼镜泡罩包装溶液的体外接触角分析和物理性能。
Eye Contact Lens. 2010 Jan;36(1):10-8. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e3181c5b385.
3
Physical properties of soft contact lens solutions.软性隐形眼镜护理液的物理性质。
Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Feb;85(2):122-8. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318162261e.
4
Impact of multipurpose solutions released from contact lenses on corneal cells.隐形眼镜释放的多功能护理液对角膜细胞的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2011 Apr;88(4):483-92. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182045967.
5
Interactions of lens care with silicone hydrogel lenses and effect on comfort.镜片护理与硅水凝胶镜片的相互作用及其对舒适度的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2010 Nov;87(11):839-46. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181f3e2fc.
6
Care regimen and lens material influence on silicone hydrogel contact lens deposition.护理方案和镜片材料对硅水凝胶隐形眼镜沉淀物的影响。
Optom Vis Sci. 2009 Mar;86(3):251-9. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318196a74b.
7
Contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis with silicone hydrogel lenses.
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2009 Apr;32(2):93-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2008.07.005. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
8
Effect of multipurpose solutions on in vivo surface wettability of a silicone hydrogel lens.多功能护理液对硅水凝胶镜片体内表面润湿性的影响。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2016 Dec;39(6):461-465. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
9
Effects of aqueous polymeric surfactants on silicone-hydrogel soft- contact-lens wettability and bacterial adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.水性高分子表面活性剂对硅水凝胶软性隐形眼镜润湿性和铜绿假单胞菌黏附的影响。
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2012 Aug;35(4):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2012.02.006. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
10
A comparison of regimen methods for the removal and inactivation of bacteria, fungi and Acanthamoeba from two types of silicone hydrogel lenses.两种硅水凝胶镜片除菌、除真菌及棘阿米巴的不同方法比较
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2009 Apr;32(2):73-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2008.12.008. Epub 2009 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Comfort Eluting Agents and Replacement Frequency on Enhancing Contact Lens Performance.舒适释药剂及更换频率对提高隐形眼镜性能的影响
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 12;19:857-873. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S512246. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative Analysis of the Osmoprotective Effects of Daily Disposable Contact Lens Packaging Solutions on Human Corneal Epithelial Cells.日抛型隐形眼镜护理液对人角膜上皮细胞渗透保护作用的比较分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 25;18:247-258. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S437841. eCollection 2024.
3
In vitro Evaluation of the Location of Cholesteryl Ester Deposits on Monthly Replacement Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Materials.
月抛型硅水凝胶隐形眼镜材料上胆固醇酯沉积物位置的体外评估
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep 24;14:2821-2828. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S270575. eCollection 2020.
4
Effect of Three Interventions on Contact Lens Comfort in Symptomatic Wearers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.三种干预措施对有症状佩戴者隐形眼镜舒适度的影响:一项随机临床试验。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0135323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135323. eCollection 2015.